Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for denek3y

Channel

denek3y

@denek3y1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

247subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001539468008
TypeChannel
Username@denek3y1
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/denek3y1

Growth

2472552517 August 2026 — 254 subscribers8 August 2026 — 254 subscribers16 August 2026 — 249 subscribers23 August 2026 — 247 subscribers30 August 2026 — 255 subscribers8 September 2026 — 248 subscribers16 September 2026 — 247 subscribers7 August 202616 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 40 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 246–256 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 19:20247-1
8 Sept 2026, 17:18248-7
30 Aug 2026, 13:54255+8
23 Aug 2026, 11:37247-2
16 Aug 2026, 02:07249-5
8 Aug 2026, 09:19254no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:08254first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

9 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5472211604131029317444.4%
custom 5310109269113186974333.3%
custom 5309980729331949934222.2%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 21:42 UTC28 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Версия 1.2.0 — Добавлена метрика Entry Attempts & Success: статистика захода на точку по игроку (первый дуэль раунда, entry-kills/entry-deaths, % успеха); считается суммарно по всем загруженным демкам (нужно ≥2 демки) — Полностью переработан Progressive Map Control: • Теперь отслеживаются и продвижения (advance), и отступления (retreat) • Карта разбита на именованные зоны (Spawn, Approach, Mid, Enemy Approach, Site

Signed denek3y

7 Aug 2026, 19:41 UTC31 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @miralogyd3Photo

😤 Закончился первый день квалы, посмотрим что есть тут — 🇺🇦 Inner Circle, 🇩🇪 BIG, 🇧🇷 DENDELE, 🇷🇺 HOTU, 🇵🇱 Betclic, 🇪🇺 BC.Game, 🇩🇰 HEROIC, 🇸🇪 fnatic ожидаемо вышли в плей-офф — 🇪🇸 Iberian Soul, 🇵🇱 9INE и 🇹🇷 Eternal Fire пока не впечатлили. Первые и третьи вообще проиграть первый матч, что провально Завтра остальные матчи группового этапа и пока я не вижу сценариев, чтобы не вышли фавориты. Испанцы и турки думаю вер

Signed Миралогия | denek3y

7 Aug 2026, 18:52 UTC37 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

даже победа 6666 более ожидаемая чем это

Signed denek3y

7 Aug 2026, 18:14 UTC45 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

читаю пост базы киберспорта и смешно а откуда крл знать об этом? (особенно если абдул это говорил лишь в цис аудитории), так и даже если так, то у него проблемы полтора года? и как это вообще отменяет что-то? получается дураком тут является ли Игорь, который обосрал крла просто так, без нормально повода

custom 53099807293319499342

Signed denek3y

7 Aug 2026, 17:28 UTC47 viewsread 8 August 2026

60 лямов дайте Сити и норм будет

Signed denek3y

7 Aug 2026, 17:25 UTC47 viewsread 8 August 2026

раз м8 попрощались со составом, то надо уже ждать подписание в новую оргу?

Signed denek3y

7 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTC47 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ну 99% матчей без удивление

custom 53101092691131869743

Signed denek3y

7 Aug 2026, 15:48 UTC49 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

бсг нужны на евц, прикольный состав действительно

custom 54722116041310293174

Signed denek3y

7 Aug 2026, 11:30 UTC40 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @esportstransPhoto

🇩🇰 Prestige: + 🇫🇮 oopee

Signed Трансферная | denek3y

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @denek3y1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Закулисье CS2
@cs2valve2 · 89,273
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“denek3y” (@denek3y1), 247 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/denek3y1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.