13 measurements spanning 35 days, net +97. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,089–9,219 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Sept 2026, 09:00
9,204
+42
5 Sept 2026, 10:39
9,162
+21
1 Sept 2026, 09:58
9,141
+6
28 Aug 2026, 23:47
9,135
+18
25 Aug 2026, 18:03
9,117
+4
22 Aug 2026, 13:33
9,113
-7
19 Aug 2026, 01:43
9,120
+1
16 Aug 2026, 04:54
9,119
+9
13 Aug 2026, 01:16
9,110
+6
10 Aug 2026, 04:37
9,104
-1
7 Aug 2026, 00:40
9,105
-2
6 Aug 2026, 04:30
9,107
no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:25
9,107
first reading
Engagement
64 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
43.9%
avg views ÷ 9,204 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,040
34 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.50%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
34
of 64 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held
64 (26 July 2026 – 28 August 2026)
Views total
137,280
Reactions total
2,053
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
3,919 reactions across 62 posts, in 37 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,562
39.9%
🔥
617
15.7%
👎
478
12.2%
❤
390
9.95%
😁
244
6.23%
💯
133
3.39%
❤🔥
90
2.30%
🥴
85
2.17%
🤣
74
1.89%
🤷♂
43
1.10%
😴
42
1.07%
🤯
31
0.791%
😢
15
0.383%
🤔
15
0.383%
🥰
15
0.383%
👀
10
0.255%
👏
10
0.255%
🥱
7
0.179%
🍾
6
0.153%
👌
6
0.153%
17 further kinds
46
1.17%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 64 of the 64 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,047 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 64 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 64 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dengames. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 64 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Посмотрел геймплей GTA VI. Ну, тут без сюрпризов - выглядит как очередная GTA, ни больше, ни меньше. Разве что, стрельба стала чуть получше, чем раньше, но судя по видео всё равно не дотягивает до современных шутеров от третьего лица.
Графика шикарна, но тут без изменений: каждая GTA на момент своего выхода (и ещё лет 10 спустя) выглядела отлично: в меру фотореализм, в меру лёгкая стилизация.
В общем, в день выхода…
Как похорошела Switch-2 версия Ведьмака при Собянине!
Ещё и про 60 FPS многие говорят (сомнительно, но окей).
Сейчас, правда, откуда-то повылазили гиены, которые воют, мол: "Нинтендогоям в нормальном качестве завезли игру 2015 года!". Они, конечно же, не помнят, в каком "качестве" игра вышла на Xbox One/PS4 и как она баговала на ПК.
А так - хорошую игру можно доделывать хоть вечно. Скайрим не даст соврать.
Ведьмак 3 уже скоро выйдет на Nintendo Switch 2! Анонсирован ремейк Героев 3! Демка Onimusha: Way Of The Sword показала, на что способен Свич 2! Всё это в новом видео уже на канале)
YouTube: https://youtu.be/SmbtdutYrQk
Rutube: https://rutube.ru/video/4c7fd716527e81f59ddf86edab9df9e5/
ВКонтакте: https://vkvideo.ru/video-101179874_456245551
Три самых важных анонса с открытия Gamescom 2026 и сравнение Onimusha: Way Of The Sword на Switch 2 с версией для PS5 и Steam Deck - всё это в новом видосе в раннем доступе на Бусти) https://boosty.to/denismajor/posts/970d7f04-1d8e-436c-9bc4-8934fb5dec98
Поиграл в сетевое тестирование The Duskbloods и рассказал, что это на самом деле за игра (у многих почему-то были неверные ожидания от неё) и что я о ней думаю. К сожалению, свои футажи (свой геймплей) я использовать для видео не мог из-за условий эмбарго, пришлось взять тот, что лежит в открытом доступе) Но там в целом по футажам всё понятно, кроме производительности - о ней словами рассказал:
YouTube: https://yout…
Стрим! Сегодня открытие Gamescom 2026 - давайте смотреть вместе) Стрим уже в эфире:
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NIdLxSRlWNI
Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/denismajor
VK: https://live.vkvideo.ru/denismajor
Очень хорошее объяснение различия железа ПК и и консолей. Да и вообще на канале много полезной инфы, смотрю периодически: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/dQZ7agzk0jU
Стрим! Что-то напряжная неделя получилась - надо расслабиться) Заодно покажу вам лучший симулятор поезда, который только можно найти в Steam. Уже в эфире:
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4IiS5eQ8Aoo
Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/denismajor
VK: https://live.vkvideo.ru/denismajor
Подробности про The Duskbloods, крупные утечки по GTA VI, геймплей Call Of Dufy на Nintendo Switch 2, обзор DayZ для Switch 2, и не только - всё это в новом видео)
YouTube: https://youtu.be/9Yj5cpXCX3U
Rutube: https://rutube.ru/video/5ead19934842e4efed68132252f99b99/
ВКонтакте: https://vkvideo.ru/video-101179874_456245477
Я заколебался с обучения в The Duskbloods. Чем хороши соулсы (все)? Качаешь игру, запускаешь, играешь, и всему учишься в процессе по мере необходимости и твоего желания.
А по The Duskbloods надо учебное заведение создавать. Семестра на два обучения, с экзаменами и написанием диплома.
😴38😁18👍8👎5
Showing the 12 most recent of 64 posts we hold for @dengames. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Nintendo | psprices.com @psprices_nintendo · 30,250 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 7 September 2026
Коммандер @ilya_commander · 48,454 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 26 August 2026
Макаренков об играх @makarenkoff_games · 28,575 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
IXBT Games | Короче @ixbtgames · 68,301 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Марио, ящик и плойка” (@dengames), 9,204 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dengames.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.