Der investigative Videokünstler Matt Orfalea hat ein brillantes Video zu Anthony Faucis Gaslighting, Widersprüchen und Lügen zusammengestellt, das sich wirklich zu sehen lohnt. Originalquelle: https://x.com/0rf/status/2053823920101581098?s=20 t.me/ayawasgeht

Channel
denkdeinding
@denkdeinding
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,823subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001186610181 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @denkdeinding |
| Created | 22 February 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/denkdeinding |
Topic
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 02:20 | 1,823 | -1 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 16:20 | 1,824 | -4 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 18:57 | 1,828 | -3 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:06 | 1,831 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:45 | 1,833 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 10:07 | 1,834 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:23 | 1,835 | +3 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:16 | 1,832 | +2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 1,830 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:33 | 1,832 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:05 | 1,831 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:32 | 1,830 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:52 | 1,830 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 29m 16s
- Average length
- 3m 40s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
99 reactions across 18 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 38 | 38.4% | |
| 💯 | 18 | 18.2% | |
| ❤ | 14 | 14.1% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 13.1% | |
| 🤮 | 7 | 7.07% | |
| 🤬 | 5 | 5.05% | |
| 💩 | 2 | 2.02% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 1.01% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 1.01% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 99 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Das hat gesessen.
❤12
Das hat er wirklich gefragt 🤷🤞
🤮3🤡1
Ich präsentiere die schleichende Entstehung einer Kontrollarchitektur: (man stelle sich nur vor, wirkliche Faschisten wenden diese an) 🤞 1. NetzDG 2. Digitale-Dienste-Gesetz 3. Digital Services Act 4. Trusted Flagger 5. Online-Meldestellen 6. Hasskriminalitätsbekämpfungsgesetz 7. „Hass und Hetze“-Gesetze 8. § 188 StGB 9. § 130 StGB 10. § 185 StGB 11. § 186 StGB 12. § 187 StGB 13. Uploadfilter 14. Artikel 17 EU-Urheb…
💯3
"Unsere Demokratie" 🤞🤞
🤮4
Willkommen in Deutschland – dem Land, in dem alles möglich ist! Vorausgesetzt, du hast den richtigen Antrag, Nachweise, Genehmigungen und Nerven. Du willst Eltern werden? Formulare, Kosten, Betreuungsplatzsuche und Existenzangst. Du willst dich selbstständig machen? Glückwunsch – hier sind Bürokratie, Steuern und Haftungsrisiken. Du willst arbeiten? Dann rechne besser nicht damit, dass sich Leistung lohnt. Du willst …
👍4
Besser kann man das nicht erklären 🤝
👍9
Wenn an Krankheit, Arbeitslosigkeit oder mangelnder Verfügbarkeit zunehmend finanzielle Nachteile, Wohnungsverlust, berufliche Unsicherheit oder ständige Rechtfertigung geknüpft werden, kann Angst sehr wohl das praktische STEUERUNGSINSTRUMENT der Politik sein. Das ist keine geheime Verschwörung, sondern eine durchaus offen erkennbare Verschiebung: vom Sozialstaat als Absicherung hin zum Sozialstaat als Kontroll- und …
Das ergibt rückblickend einen bemerkenswerten Kontrast: vor genau 10 Jahren war unknackbare private Kommunikation eine Revolution und ein Sicherheitsgewinn. Heute wird dieselbe Eigenschaft bei der Chatkontrolle plötzlich als politisches, gesellschaftliches und technisches Problem behandelt 🤞
👍6❤1
Warum ein Überwachungsstaat kein Problem ist 🤞 also für manche
🔥4💩2
Der größte Sozialfall Deutschlands sitzt nicht im Jobcenter - sondern im Parlament. Die Politik erklärt uns regelmäßig, Deutschland könne sich seinen Sozialstaat nicht mehr leisten. Zu viele Rentner. Zu viele Kranke. Zu viele Arbeitslose. Zu viele Menschen, die angeblich „das System ausnutzen“. Vielleicht sollten wir die Frage einmal anders stellen: KANN SICH DIE BEVÖLKERUNG DIESE POLITIK EIGENTLICH NOCH LEISTEN?…
💯7❤1
In der Politik heißt ein Rücktritt eben nicht zwangsläufig Karriereende. Manchmal bedeutet er nur: bitte im nächsten Amt wieder einsteigen. Dann gibt es noch Cum-Ex. Treffen mit Bankiers. Millionen an möglichen Steuerrückforderungen. Untersuchungsausschüsse. Und Erinnerungen, die offenbar genau dort aufhörten, wo politische Verantwortung hätte anfangen können. Auch die im Bundestag dokumentierte Debatte drehte sic…
👍5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @denkdeinding. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“denkdeinding” (@denkdeinding), 1,823 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/denkdeinding.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.