Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for دنتان | Dentan

Channel

دنتان | Dentan

@dentan_ac

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,698subscribers

+245 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001149244033
TypeChannel
Username@dentan_ac
CreatedBetween 1 June 2016 and 31 January 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/dentan_ac

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

12,45312,69812,575.56 August 2026 — 12,453 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,453 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,456 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,465 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,467 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,469 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,482 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,487 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,495 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,499 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,497 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,505 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,567 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,571 subscribers22 August 2026 — 12,578 subscribers23 August 2026 — 12,574 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,573 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,580 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,583 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,584 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,587 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,584 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,585 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,588 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,592 subscribers5 September 2026 — 12,604 subscribers9 September 2026 — 12,616 subscribers11 September 2026 — 12,629 subscribers13 September 2026 — 12,637 subscribers15 September 2026 — 12,650 subscribers17 September 2026 — 12,654 subscribers19 September 2026 — 12,698 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 44 days, net +245. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,416–12,735 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 17:3712,698+44
17 Sept 2026, 03:5912,654+4
15 Sept 2026, 06:5512,650+13
13 Sept 2026, 15:2012,637+8
11 Sept 2026, 17:5812,629+13
9 Sept 2026, 05:3712,616+12
5 Sept 2026, 20:2212,604+12
3 Sept 2026, 15:4112,592+4
2 Sept 2026, 09:0312,588+3
31 Aug 2026, 04:3512,585+1
30 Aug 2026, 05:3612,584-3
29 Aug 2026, 03:4912,587+3
28 Aug 2026, 07:0312,584+1
27 Aug 2026, 04:0812,583+3
26 Aug 2026, 05:1212,580+7
25 Aug 2026, 03:4412,573-1
23 Aug 2026, 22:5512,574-4
22 Aug 2026, 03:2712,578+7
20 Aug 2026, 16:5612,571+4
19 Aug 2026, 16:0312,567first reading

Engagement

128 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.57%
avg views ÷ 12,698 subscribers
Avg views / post
961
36 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.372%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
37
of 128 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 21 of 36 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held128 (3 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total34,603
Reactions total82
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 21:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 07s
Average length
46s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

221 reactions across 58 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9743.9%
👍7433.5%
😁219.50%
😡188.14%
🔥41.81%
🙏41.81%
👌31.36%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 65 of the 128 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 221 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 128 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 20:25 UTC232 views3 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

✅ اسم این تکنیک ابچوریشن رو می‌دونی ؟

👍3

1 Sept 2026, 19:50 UTC718 viewsread 2 September 2026

⛔ پنجشنبه قراره توی وبینار دو ساعت کامل درمورد کانال های کلسیفیه و کانال MB2 صحبت کنیم 💻 اگه میخوای یک بار برای همیشه مدیریت کانال های کلسیفیه و MB2 رو یاد بگیری ، منتظرتیم 🫡 برای ثبت نام ، با فیلترشکن خاموش بزن روی لینک زیر 👇🏻 https://evnd.co/ZsjzU .

1 Sept 2026, 19:47 UTC703 viewsread 2 September 2026
Voice message

🎙 دکتر علی نساج | اندودنتیست و عضو هیئت علمی دانشگاه بهشتی ⁉️وقتی فایل فقط یکی دو میلی‌متر جلو می‌ره و بعد گیر می‌کنه، چطور بفهمم مشکل از کلسیفیکیشنه یا مسیر اشتباه؟ ✅ دنتان | اولین مرجع آموزش دندانپزشکی ایران @dentan_ac

1 Sept 2026, 19:44 UTC709 viewsread 2 September 2026

⚠️ موقعیت: فایل یکی دو میلی‌متر وارد میشه و بعد متوقف میشه. اینجا یه اشتباه تشخیصی می‌تونه کل ادامه کار رو عوض کنه: 1️⃣ مسیر درسته و کلسیفیکیشن اجازه پیشروی نمی‌ده؟ یا 2️⃣ اصلاً فایل وارد مسیر واقعی کانال نشده؟ از دکتر نساج خواستیم بگن توی این موقعیت به چه چیزی توجه کنیم 👇🏻

1 Sept 2026, 19:42 UTC646 views3 reactionsread 2 September 2026

⛔ ۲۴ تا از چالش‌های واقعی دندانپزشک‌ها در مواجهه با کانال کلسیفیه رو جمع کردیم. 👈🏻از بینشون چند سؤال رو مستقیم بردیم پیش دکتر علی نساج، متخصص اندو و هیئت علمی دانشگاه بهشتی 👀 ⚠️قرار نیست جواب‌ها طولانی باشن؛ هر ویس، پاسخ کوتاه دکتر به یک موقعیت مشخص کلینیکیه. اولی رو تا چند دقیقه دیگه می‌ذارم 🎙

3

31 Aug 2026, 18:40 UTC808 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

✅ فقط توی دوساعت ، به یکی از چالش های اندو مسلط شو 😍 🔵 موضوع وبینار: مدیریت کانال‌های کلسیفیه و MB2 در اندو 👨🏻‍⚕️ مدرس: دکتر علی نساج متخصص اندو و هیئت علمی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی 📅 12 شهریور ⏰ ساعت 20 💰 هزینه ثبت‌نام: 590 هزار تومان 📌 لینک ثبت‌نام: https://evnd.co/ZsjzU ✅ وبینار ذخیره میشه !

31 Aug 2026, 18:40 UTC728 views3 reactionsread 2 September 2026

اگه می‌خوای بدونی... 👇🏻 🩻 چطور باید بفهمی کانال واقعاً کلسیفیه شده یا فقط توی رادیوگرافی خوب دیده نمی‌شه؟ 🔍 چطور با لندمارک‌های کف پالپ‌چمبر، محل کانال کلسیفیه رو دقیق‌تر پیدا کنی؟ ⚠️ چطور اوریفیس واقعی رو از مسیری که با فرز ایجاد کردی تشخیص بدی؟ 🦷 برای شروع Canal Negotiation در کانال کلسیفیه، سراغ چه فایل دستی‌ای بری؟ 📍 فایل دستی رو چطور حرکت بدی که هم پیشروی کنی، هم فایل گیر نکنه؟ 🔄 کِی می‌تونی سراغ فای

3

30 Aug 2026, 19:14 UTC927 views4 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

آبچوریشن فقط «پر کردن کانال» نیست! 👀 . انتخاب سیلر، تکنیک مناسب هر کیس، کنترل طول و مدیریت خطاها، همگی می‌تونن نتیجه نهایی درمان رو تغییر بدن. در دوره حضوری «صفر تا صد آبچوریشن + MTA Plug» قراره تکنیک‌های مختلف آبچوریشن، سیلرهای بایوسرامیک، تکنیک‌های حرارتی و مدیریت اپکس باز با MTA رو به‌صورت کاربردی و کلینیکی بررسی کنیم. . 👩🏻‍⚕️ مدرس: دکتر ثنا جباری، اندودنتیست 📍 تهران 📅 ۲۰ شهریور ⚠️ ظرفیت محدود . برای دریافت شرای

👍31

30 Aug 2026, 19:12 UTC823 views3 reactionsread 2 September 2026

⚠️اگه میخواید توی یک روز ، درمان های اندو تون رو لول آپ کنید ، کورس زیر رو بهتون پیشنهاد میکنم 👇🏻

😁3

30 Aug 2026, 19:11 UTC793 views10 reactionsread 2 September 2026

⚠️برای من به شخصه اینجوری بود که هرچی سرعت اندو بیشتر میشد ، اندو برام جذاب تر میشد ! 🙄 بیمارم هم راضی تر بود طبیعتا وقتی کارش سریعتر انجام می‌شد 😇

😡7👍3

30 Aug 2026, 19:10 UTC782 views15 reactionsread 2 September 2026

✅ قطعا که استفاده از روتاری خیلی سرعت رو زیاد می‌کنه ! ولی قبول کنید لذتی که توی single cone ابچوریشن هست ، توی روتاری نیست 😅 یه جوری اندو رو راحت می‌کنه که هر دندانپزشکی رو به اندو علاقمند می‌کنه !

😁8😡7

30 Aug 2026, 19:02 UTC880 viewsread 2 September 2026
Poll

اندو خلفی چقدر ازتون زمان میگیره ؟ با رعایت تمامی مراحل بالینی 🙏🏼💚

  1. حدود یک ساعت33%
  2. دو ساعت به بالا39%
  3. دانشجو هستم و چند جلسه طول می‌کشه30%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 128 posts we hold for @dentan_ac. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Aug 2026, 19:02 UTCAnonymous Poll241 voters

اندو خلفی چقدر ازتون زمان میگیره ؟ با رعایت تمامی مراحل بالینی 🙏🏼💚

  1. حدود یک ساعت33%
  2. دو ساعت به بالا39%
  3. دانشجو هستم و چند جلسه طول می‌کشه30%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

24 Aug 2026, 18:36 UTCAnonymous Poll426 voters

اکسیدا امسال شرکت میکنید ؟ 🙄

  1. بله 🫡27%
  2. نه 😶75%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

14 Aug 2026, 20:36 UTCAnonymous Poll236 voters

کدومش؟

  1. 🦷 یه اندوی تر و تمیز36%
  2. ✨ یه کامپوزیت خوشگل27%
  3. 👑 یه کیس پروتز بی‌دردسر13%
  4. 😌 فقط معاینه لطفاً :))32%

The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 128 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

روابط عاطفی با ساناز شفیعی
@sanaz_shafieiii · 124,969
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 13 August 2026
medistU | مدیستیو
@medistU · 53,598
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 24 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“دنتان | Dentan” (@dentan_ac), 12,698 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dentan_ac.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.