📊 اشتراک کانال #صف_به_صف 📊 اشتراک کانال #تکسهم 🔰 《تخفیف💥 ویژه عضویت های امروز 》 @Departeman11

Channel
دپارتمان بورس
@departeman_ir
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
16,133subscribers
-179 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001285624891 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @departeman_ir |
| Description | admin: reza ⬇️ لینک @Departeman11 @Departeman11 دست نوشته های شخصی،مسئولیت برداشت از مطالب با خودتان،تحلیل آزمون وخطا دارد فیلتر ؛ خرید + فروش بر مبنا ؛ فیلتر شناسایی ورود ؛ ( کف حمایتی ) فیلتر شناسایی خروج ؛ (سقف مقاومتی ) |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 57 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/departeman_ir |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 02:09 | 16,133 | -1 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 03:59 | 16,134 | -4 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 05:31 | 16,138 | -1 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 06:17 | 16,139 | +13 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 04:58 | 16,126 | -5 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 06:08 | 16,131 | -6 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 04:06 | 16,137 | -6 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 07:37 | 16,143 | -9 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 04:27 | 16,152 | -6 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 02:44 | 16,158 | -11 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 22:58 | 16,169 | -8 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 20:55 | 16,177 | -6 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 18:41 | 16,183 | -3 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 21:27 | 16,186 | -9 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 21:31 | 16,195 | -2 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 17:36 | 16,197 | +14 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 17:07 | 16,183 | -3 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 14:49 | 16,186 | +2 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 14:39 | 16,184 | -4 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 13:17 | 16,188 | first reading |
Engagement
388 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 92 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 15.9%
- avg views ÷ 16,133 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,570
- 37 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 37
- of 388 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 388 (5 August 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 95,170 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 19:42 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈4,690
- Videos
- ≈65
- Links
- ≈3,160
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 37 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
#فملی ؛ چهارمین #صف_خرید پیاپی خرید از #صف_فروش اینجا👇 https://t.me/departeman_ir/40757 🗓1405/08/16 @departeman_ir
📊 اشتراک کانال #صف_به_صف 📊 اشتراک کانال #تکسهم 🔰 @Departeman11
#غزر #تکسهم اول آبانماه بازده تا اینجا 15%+✔️ معرفی جهت اعضا در منفی سهم 👇 https://t.me/departeman_ir/40799 🗓1405/08/15 @departeman_ir
گروه لاستیک ، هفته خوبی را داشتند و ادامه دار هم خواهد بود ؛ بازده هفتگی تایر سازها 🔰 #پکرمان 16%+ #پارتا ؛ 15%+ #پاسا ؛ 14%+ #پیزد ؛ 12%+ 🔹علت توجه بازار به تایرسازها ؛ رشد قیمت جهانی مواد اولیه به جهت تنش های خاورمیانه افزایش تقاضا و قیمت در بازار داخلی 🗓1405/08/15 @departeman_ir
🔹 بیشترین بازده هفتگی ؛ 《به جز عرضه اولیه ها 》 #آردینه #فباهنر #کابگن #ثنام #پارتا #کتوسعه #پکرمان #شاروم #فاذر #غزر 🗓1405/06/15 @departeman_ir
🔹خریدهای گروهی ؛ #پکرمان #شتران #فزر #وغدیر #انتخاب #خراسان #فملی #کرماشا 🗓1405/08/15 @departeman_ir
🔹 برترین ها در ورود پول ؛ گروه / نماد فلزات ؛ #فولاد #فملی #فخوز #فسوژ #فباهنر پتروشیمی ؛ #تاپیکو #پارسان #شبصیر #فارس #خراسان #کرماشا #شپدیس #تابان بازیگرمحور ؛ #پکرمان #ثپهران #وپایا #مادیرا #فزر تکسهم ؛ #غزر #شبهرن #شتوکا #فتوسا #فزر 🗓1405/08/15 @departeman_ir
طرح 💥تخفیف دار معرفی #تکسهم 🔰 @Departeman11
با اخباری که روانه بازار شد ؛ هفته آینده بورس یک دست سبز هست ✅ آخر هفته خوبی برای یک بورسی نقد نیست @departeman_ir
🔹اشتراک کانال #تکسهم 🔹اشتراک کانال #صف_به_صف 🔰 @Departeman11
#غزر پنجمین صف خرید برتر بازار #تکسهم اول آبانماه بازده تا اینجا 18%+✔️ معرفی جهت اعضا در منفی سهم 👇 https://t.me/departeman_ir/40799 🗓1405/08/13 @departeman_ir
Showing the 12 most recent of 388 posts we hold for @departeman_ir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@departeman_ir edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 15 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 17 August 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 55 posts on @departeman_ir as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 7 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 4 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 21 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 5
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@bourse_planner · 75,467
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 August 2026
@bourse_plussss · 36,054
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 5 September 2026
@signallbartarvip · 32,473
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 September 2026
@VIPBOORSS · 37,636
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 30 August 2026
@ChanelVIP20 · 51,978
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 23 August 2026
@sahamedalatbors · 20,033
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 25 September 2026
@HOSHMANDchannell · 25,895
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 September 2026
@VIP_Top_Signal · 19,652
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 September 2026
@bourse_poll · 42,169
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
@tahlillbartar · 28,343
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
@signalyab1 · 41,226
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 30 August 2026
@afzayeshbors1 · 38,082
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 31 August 2026
@arzebours · 19,298
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 2 October 2026
@Codal360_ir · 131,408
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 August 2026
@gold_signaalll · 21,275
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 23 September 2026
@SignalRaygan_Afagh · 30,049
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 7 September 2026
@arzeh1avalieh1 · 25,519
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 September 2026
@boursekootahmodat · 37,690
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 31 August 2026
@modern_navasan · 101,219
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 18 August 2026
@safee_kharid · 11,441
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 September 2026
@Dlkhoosh · 99,961
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 17 August 2026
@kian1one · 53,790
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 25 August 2026
@arzeh1avalieha · 98,174
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 August 2026
@sahamyaab · 29,760
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 September 2026
This channel appears in 40 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“دپارتمان بورس” (@departeman_ir), 16,133 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/departeman_ir.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.