Channel photo updated

Channel
Deputado HELIO LOPES
@depheliolopes
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,508subscribers
+250 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001263991430 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @depheliolopes |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/depheliolopes |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept 2026, 12:37 | 7,508 | +59 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:13 | 7,449 | +55 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:18 | 7,394 | -25 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:03 | 7,419 | +85 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:44 | 7,334 | -10 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 02:11 | 7,344 | +25 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:15 | 7,319 | +8 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:11 | 7,311 | -20 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:11 | 7,331 | +74 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:12 | 7,257 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 7,258 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:00 | 7,258 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 9.42%
- avg views ÷ 7,508 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 707
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- 9.90%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 2
- of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (12 July 2026 – 18 August 2026) |
| Views total | 707 |
| Reactions total | 70 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 23:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 9m 47s
- Average length
- 1m 05s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
830 reactions across 17 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 287 | 34.6% | |
| 👏 | 154 | 18.6% | |
| ❤ | 133 | 16.0% | |
| 🙏 | 131 | 15.8% | |
| 🤬 | 39 | 4.70% | |
| 😁 | 33 | 3.98% | |
| 😡 | 26 | 3.13% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 1.08% | |
| 💩 | 6 | 0.723% | |
| 😈 | 4 | 0.482% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 0.361% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.241% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 0.12% | |
| 🤪 | 1 | 0.12% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.12% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 830 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Vamos CLAMAR pelo Brasil! A sua presença vai ser muito importante! Amanhã vai ser o 1° dia de vários! 14 - se o meu povo, que se chama pelo meu nome, se humilhar e orar, buscar a minha face e se afastar dos seus maus caminhos, dos céus o ouvirei, perdoarei o seu pecado e curarei a sua terra 2 Crônicas 7:14
🙏58👍10❤1💩1
Internet de qualidade, barata e com mais velocidade! É isso que queremos levar para as favelas do Rio de Janeiro e de todo Brasil. Quando oferecemos um recurso no estilo starlink, toda a comunidade é favorecida! Essa proposta também faz parte do Bolsonarismo Social, onde vamos transformar dificuldade em oportunidade! #internet #favela #oportunidade #bolsonarismosocial #22teses
👏46👍10❤3💩1
Vocês já conheciam essa proposta? Com @flaviobolsonaro presidente e um congresso forte, conseguiremos implementar a Zona Franca das Favelas, uma das propostas do Bolsonarismo Social, que cria mais oportunidades, emprego e desenvolvimento para quem vive nas comunidades. Fica ligado! Vocês ainda vão ver por aqui muitas propostas que vão transformar a vida de quem mais precisa. 🇧🇷💙 #favela #zonafranca #menosimpostos…
👍41👏10
Meu amigo @magnomalta conta todos os detalhes da missão que meu irmão Bolsonaro me confiou para que a gente possa ter um congresso forte e lutar pelos verdadeiros interesses do estado de Roraima, que como Bolsonaro fala: tem tanta riqueza, que poderia ter o PIB do Japão!
👏58👍7🙏3💩1🔥1
É uma honra contar com seu apoio no dia 22, em Roraima, @magnomalta @flaviobolsonaro, meu irmão, é uma imensa satisfação fazer parte dessa família e poder manter o legado do meu irmão @jairmessiasbolsonaro em Roraima, terra tão querida por nós! Nos encontramos na convenção, dia 22, em Roraima!
❤42👍14👏5🙏2💩1🔥1
Ontem, no lançamento da pré-candidatura da da minha irmã em Cristo @maguinhamalta, filha do destemido @magnomalta, eu tive a satisfação de dividir o palco com meu irmão e próximo presidente do Brasil @flaviobolsonaro. Como ele bem lembrou em sua fala, não existe mudança sem um Congresso forte. Precisamos eleger homens e mulheres comprometidos com a liberdade, a Constituição e os valores do nosso povo para resgatar o…
👍43❤9👎2🔥1
Você já parou para pensar por que tantas políticas públicas falham em transformar a realidade das comunidades? E se o problema não fosse a falta de recursos, mas a forma como enxergamos as pessoas? As 22 Teses do Bolsonarismo Social propõem um novo caminho: trocar a dependência pela oportunidade, fortalecer quem trabalha, incentivar o empreendedorismo, ampliar o acesso à propriedade, investir na família e criar con…
👏34👍5❤3💩1🔥1🙏1
Hoje apresentei ao senador Flávio Bolsonaro o manifesto 22 Teses do Bolsonarismo Social. O documento reúne propostas para transformar as favelas brasileiras por meio do trabalho, do empreendedorismo, da propriedade, da família e da liberdade. Uma das principais propostas é ampliar a regularização fundiária para que milhares de famílias possam transformar seus imóveis em patrimônio, acessar crédito e conquistar mais…
👍41❤3👌3🔥1🤪1
Qurem acabar com a vida do meu irmão @jairmessiasbolsonaro, exterminar qualquer força dele, mas ele seguirá sendo nosso líder. Não vamos deixar que matem meu irmão, não vamos deixar que enterrem Bolsonaro vivo! Chega dessa injustiça. Em outubro temos o dever de mudar esse cenário
❤38👍11🙏6💩1
Importante sempre lembrar como a esquerda nos trata, principalmente nesse período eleitoral, que é quando tentam mudar o discurso e se aproximar dos cristãos
👍33
Será que Lula vai comparecer?
😁33🙏9👍5
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @depheliolopes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@depheliolopes named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 12 posts, 8 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 9 posts, 8 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@carlazambellioficial · 53,932
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 24 August 2026
@senadorflaviobolsonaro · 86,232
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
@gusgayer · 30,987
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 6 September 2026
@canalteatualizei · 30,905
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 6 September 2026
@depeduardobolsonaro · 61,533
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 22 August 2026
@bolsonarocarlos · 110,297
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Deputado HELIO LOPES” (@depheliolopes), 7,508 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/depheliolopes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.