Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Глубинная терапия 🧠 | Елена Мацугина

Channel

Глубинная терапия 🧠 | Елена Мацугина

@depth_psychotherapy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,657subscribers

-617 since we began measuring on 20 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002309514438
TypeChannel
Username@depth_psychotherapy
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded20 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/depth_psychotherapy

Growth

1,6572,2741,965.520 August 2026 — 2,274 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,274 subscribers21 August 2026 — 2,272 subscribers25 August 2026 — 2,216 subscribers28 August 2026 — 2,134 subscribers31 August 2026 — 1,664 subscribers3 September 2026 — 1,657 subscribers20 August 20263 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 14 days, net -617. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,564–2,367 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 18:571,657-7
31 Aug 2026, 14:581,664-470
28 Aug 2026, 06:062,134-82
25 Aug 2026, 02:272,216-56
21 Aug 2026, 19:152,272-2
20 Aug 2026, 19:152,274no change
20 Aug 2026, 19:002,274first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
37.2%
avg views ÷ 1,657 subscribers
Avg views / post
617
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.12%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026
Posts held15 (7 August 202620 August 2026)
Views total7,402
Reactions total440
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 19:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 27s
Average length
1m 14s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

590 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10818.3%
💯8514.4%
🤩7713.1%
🥰6110.3%
❤‍🔥6010.2%
👍538.98%
🔥538.98%
😍477.97%
🎉467.80%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 590 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 14 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @depth_psychotherapy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2026 to 20 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 12:04 UTC697 viewsread 20 August 2026
Video

Если когда-то вам пришлось замёрзнуть, это не значит, что теперь вы обязаны жить в холоде. #Агрессия #Холодность #Винникотт #Психоанализ Канал в МАХ | Канал в ВК | Визитка

19 Aug 2026, 12:04 UTC525 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

«Призрачная нить»: когда забота становится пугающей Рейнольдс Вудкок создаёт идеальные платья и так же тщательно контролирует свою жизнь. Завтрак, работа, тишина, женщина рядом - всё должно подчиняться его правилам. Для другого человека в этом безупречном мире почти не остаётся места. Альма отказывается быть очередным красивым дополнением. Но вместо того чтобы уйти, она находит способ стать незаменимой (не буду тут

18 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC≈1,080 views9 reactions3 Starsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Семейное дерево бывает слышно в одной фразе «У нас женщины всё тянут сами». «Мужчинам нельзя доверять». «Не радуйся заранее». «Главное - не высовываться». Такие фразы кажутся семейной мудростью. Но иногда за ними скрывается опыт потери, насилия, войны, предательства или внезапного разорения. Ребёнок получает не саму историю, а вывод, который когда-то помог семье выжить. Проходят десятилетия, опасность исчезает,

2🎉2🤩2🥰2👍1

17 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC584 views89 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Почему мы снова выбираем знакомую боль Человек меняет города, работу, партнёров - и однажды замечает: сюжет остаётся прежним. Сначала его выбирают и приближают. Затем начинают обесценивать или отдаляться. Он старается заслужить любовь, терпит холод, злится - и снова остаётся один. Фрейд называл это навязчивым повторением. Мы не просто вспоминаем прошлое - мы бессознательно разыгрываем его в настоящем. Не потому,

23🔥21💯16👍15🥰14

16 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC576 views29 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Чьи истории продолжают жить во мне? На этой неделе мы говорили о том, что семейная история передаётся не только через рассказы. Иногда она передаётся через молчание. Через тревогу матери, которая каждый раз звонит взрослому ребёнку, если тот задержался. Через запрет радоваться раньше времени. Через привычку не привязываться, потому что «всё равно потеряешь». Это не означает, что наши чувства нам не принадлежат. Мы

8👍7🥰6❤‍🔥5😍3

15 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC554 views23 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

То, что не названо, управляет тобой. То, что названо, становится просто историей. Зигмунд Фрейд, «Вытеснение» (1915): детально разобран механизм ухода болезненного опыта из сознания, но не исчезает. Этот подавленный материал продолжает управлять человеком через невротические симптомы, повторяющиеся жизненные сценарии, необоснованные страхи и оговорки, прорываясь наружу в искаженном виде. #ПризракиПрошлого Канал в

💯7❤‍🔥4👍4🥰4😍4

14 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC560 views42 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

«Замещающий ребёнок» и другие навязанные сценарии Есть ещё один сценарий - когда ребёнок рождается не для себя. Психологи Альберт и Барбара Кейн в 1964 году впервые описали феномен «замещающего ребёнка» (replacement child). Это когда родители, не справившись с утратой, рожают нового ребёнка, чтобы «заменить» умершего. Имя, дата рождения, ожидания - всё напоминает о том, кого нет. Ребёнок оказывается в ловушке: он д

🎉13👍10🤩10🥰6🔥3

13 Aug 2026, 12:04 UTC748 views33 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

Названная история перестаёт быть безымянной тревогой. Канал в МАХ | Канал в ВК | Визитка

🤩87😍7❤‍🔥6🔥5

12 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC32 views75 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Клиент годами жил с напряжением в челюсти и плечах. Постепенно в терапии стало проявляться то, что прежде не находило слов: рядом с отцом ему приходилось скрывать злость и не показывать слабость. Одна из возможных интерпретаций: напряжение в челюсти стало телесным способом сдерживать злость, которую когда-то было опасно показывать отцу. Это не означает, что у любого спазма обязательно психологическая причина. Но ин

🔥1716🎉15😍14🤩13

11 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC610 views37 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Торможение: когда успех становится опасным Мы говорили о том, как агрессия уходит в пассивность, как Сверх-Я становится палачом. Но есть ещё одно последствие - когда функция просто… перестаёт работать. Фрейд в «Торможении, симптоме и тревоге» пишет: «Торможение - это выражение ограничения функции Я, которое само может иметь самые разные причины. ... Другие торможения происходят, очевидно, на службе самонаказания,

9💯9🔥7❤‍🔥6🎉6

10 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC551 views18 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Проекция и интроекция агрессии Мы говорили о холодной матери, о подавленной агрессии, о том, как она разворачивается против нас. Но есть ещё один механизм - как агрессия путешествует туда-сюда между нами и миром. Мелани Кляйн описала это на примере ребёнка. Ребёнок злится на мать. Но злиться на ту, от кого зависишь, - страшно. И тогда психика делает финт: она проецирует свою злость на мать. Теперь не «я злюсь», а

👍5😍53❤‍🔥3🤩2

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @depth_psychotherapy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Глубинная терапия 🧠 | Елена Мацугина” (@depth_psychotherapy), 1,657 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/depth_psychotherapy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.