Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
6 measurements spanning 32 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 484–497 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Sept 2026, 23:59
485
-1
28 Aug 2026, 17:06
486
-3
20 Aug 2026, 19:04
489
-3
14 Aug 2026, 15:38
492
-3
6 Aug 2026, 18:47
495
no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:51
495
first reading
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 9 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
343 reactions across 8 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
151
44.0%
👍
126
36.7%
🔥
27
7.87%
🤡
13
3.79%
💔
8
2.33%
❤🔥
6
1.75%
👎
4
1.17%
🤣
2
0.583%
🤮
2
0.583%
👏
1
0.292%
💩
1
0.292%
😁
1
0.292%
🥱
1
0.292%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 343 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 9 April 2025 to 31 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 8 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @deputat_Fateyev. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 April 2025 to 31 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
От «штаба Навального» до охраны взвода зэков. История яркого регионального оппозиционера, который оказался в окопе
Когда-то штабы Навального и Собчак казались монолитными кузницами кадров для «прекрасной России будущего». Сергей Чайковский был там своим: выходил на акции, отхватывал за них штрафы, получал гранты на активистские проекты. Выглядит как типичный путь к политической эмиграции.
Но реальность оказалась др…
Начинаем аукцион! 🕊
Целых 40 лотов — и все их прислали вы, чтобы поддержать акцию Возвращение имен. Среди них самое разное: от вебинара о стипендиях и сеанса с психологиней до книг, журналов, картин, украшений, вязаного шарфа и варежек. Спасибо всем, кто откликнулся и предложил свои вещи, изделия и услуги!
А теперь — самое интересное. Аукцион стартует 25 октября и продлится четыре дня — с 25 по 28 октября. Он пройд…
👀 На избирательные участки не пускают наблюдателей — станьте избирателем-наблюдателем!
Приходите на свой избирательный участок 12-14 сентября и запишите, что увидели. Вот форма со списком вопросов от наблюдателей. Она очень простая и не потребует от вас задерживаться на участке.
В нынешнем состоянии законодательства направлять независимых наблюдателей на участки крайне сложно, на большинстве избирательных участков …
Даже сейчас, когда “выборы” мало похожи на выборы, оставаться в стороне — не лучшая тактика. Не стоит облегчать подлецам задачу по уничтожению демократических процедур. Присоединяйтесь 👇
На прошлой неделе многие писали об Алексее Навальном — ему должно было исполниться 49 лет. Хочу тоже сказать несколько слов. Лично пообщаться с ним мне удалось совсем немного, в основном во время его визита в Томск, когда Алексея отравили «Новичком». Я потом не раз восстанавливал в памяти события тех дней, но сейчас хочу рассказать не о событиях, а о впечатлениях.
Сегодня Алексей Навальный — герой для миллионов люде…
Herzlich willkommen, Хер Акатаев!
Ярый фанат ФК «Барселона» Чингиз Акатаев на днях сообщил, что собирается посетить финал Лиги Чемпионов в Мюнхене.
Считаю неправильным, что человек, который 25 лет работал на путинскую власть, поддерживал войну и топил за диктатора, теперь прикидывается простым футбольным болельщиком и едет развлекаться в «страну НАТО». Ту самую, с которой он и его однопартийцы много лет «отчаянно б…
Я решил снова вести канал, но теперь здесь будет далеко не только про Томск и политику. Последние 3 года мне было морально тяжело вести соцсети. Сначала арест моей коллеги и друга Ксении. И писать про детские площадки на округе или эмиграцию казалось неуместным, когда происходит такая несправедливость с близким тебе человеком. Потом началась война, и думать о чём-либо другом стало очень тяжело. Совсем рядом, в Украин…
🦔🐕🐈 Зовём вас на пикет 13 апреля с 12:00 до 13:00, в сквер на пересечении ул. Усова/Белинского (ул. Усова, 11а).
❓ Зачем пикет? Так мы хотим выразить своё несогласие с инициативой депутатов Гос Думы избавляться от преданных, брошенных, бывших домашних животных.
⛔ По мнению инициаторов, таких животных надо "гуманно усыплять" (хотя о какой гуманности можно говорить, если речь идёт об убийстве?) по истечении некоторо…
❤20👍6🤡6
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @deputat_Fateyev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@deputat_Fateyev named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@auctionreturningthenames named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Свободный маршрут |Андрей Фатеев” (@deputat_Fateyev), 485 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/deputat_Fateyev.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
