https://youtu.be/D3U7FJFjs9k?is=qvJnLgXfAqIDM0Am

Channel
Der Aluhut
@der_aluhut
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
81subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001205878510 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @der_aluhut |
| Created | 7 March 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/der_aluhut |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:30 | 81 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:28 | 81 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 12 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 889
- Videos
- 611
- Links
- 695
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 2h 14m
- Average length
- 26m 58s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
so isses
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥Zukunftskompass 24.06.26: Aktivierungs-Code: Quantum Dominance Heute in der Sendung: Neues und Erschreckendes von der USAID - Es ist alles viel schlimmer Dr. Fauci fällt - Das Corona-Verbrechen kommt an die Oberfläche Und was meint Trump mit "Quantum Dominance" Quantentechnologie oder doch etwas Anderes? sowie Analysen, Berichte und Meinungen Rumble Sendung: https://rumble.com/v7brpsg-zukunftskompass-24.06.26-akti…
https://youtu.be/oUCGVLsqd6E?is=PUVVm1xodgiPrPm5
https://youtu.be/k-hNfGyi9S8?is=c8Uu-qb1Br3PJDsA
https://youtu.be/D5qh7-gM0Zg?si=9PmPU6aWCyqAoGbl
https://youtu.be/ZcmTlHBfC5k?is=7IrGVrOXpbF0kGJf
https://youtube.com/shorts/4s1E23xBayc?is=RG0YvCDctXy61qX4
Abu über Ben & Höcke uallah... ........................... 🍍 Dies das Ananas Crowdfunding HIER: https://ananas-film.de
Lustiges Farbspiel 🤔🤔🤔🤔
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @der_aluhut. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@der_aluhut named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026 · confirmed gone 12 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Der Aluhut” (@der_aluhut), 81 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/der_aluhut.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.