Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Der lichte Tag

Channel

Der lichte Tag

@derlichteTag

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,570subscribers

-18 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001622524782
TypeChannel
Username@derlichteTag
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/derlichteTag

Growth

3,5703,5923,5817 August 2026 — 3,588 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,588 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,592 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,589 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,581 subscribers19 August 2026 — 3,577 subscribers22 August 2026 — 3,574 subscribers28 August 2026 — 3,576 subscribers31 August 2026 — 3,575 subscribers2 September 2026 — 3,572 subscribers7 September 2026 — 3,570 subscribers7 August 20267 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 32 days, net -18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,567–3,595 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 23:393,570-2
2 Sept 2026, 17:143,572-3
31 Aug 2026, 01:543,575-1
28 Aug 2026, 04:343,576+2
22 Aug 2026, 17:033,574-3
19 Aug 2026, 15:293,577-4
16 Aug 2026, 15:153,581-8
13 Aug 2026, 02:573,589-3
10 Aug 2026, 10:503,592+4
7 Aug 2026, 01:303,588no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:183,588first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,114 reactions across 18 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
61955.6%
👍36432.7%
🤔383.41%
🥰312.78%
🔥181.62%
👌161.44%
😁121.08%
😢80.718%
🐳50.449%
🌭30.269%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,114 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 18:09 UTC≈1,430 views174 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

110👍37🥰22👌3🤔2

2 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC≈2,990 views211 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Liebe Freunde, vom Mo., 3. August, bis Di., 11. August, im Hochgebirge verschwunden, tauche ich am 12. August wieder auf. Lasst es euch gut gehen! Herzlichst, Richard

142👍57👌7🐳5

1 Aug 2026, 17:56 UTC≈2,800 views251 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @FrankKoestlerPhoto

Lichtblickrunde offline aber live ❤️

206👍39🔥5🥰1

1 Aug 2026, 17:56 UTC≈2,440 views119 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Mal ganz was anderes: Die Lichtblick-Runde war eine schöne Gesprächsrunde, in der die aktuellen Themen mit den dahinter stehenden Ebenen verknüpft wurden. (Steht weiterhin auf YouTube.) Offensichtlich gab sie vielen Menschen etwas und wirkte verbindend. Gewiss wird es immer wieder mal Gespräche zu zweit oder zu dritt geben. Macht ja auch Spaß... Danke für die Rückmeldung, F.! 👇

👍6548👌6

1 Aug 2026, 06:24 UTC≈2,580 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CoY7PV7OGck

👍17🔥4🤔32

1 Aug 2026, 06:24 UTC≈2,070 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Wenn das Versagen nicht zu kaschieren ist, werden die Menschen wütend. Damit ist zu rechnen. Vielleicht zeigen die Medien dann auf bestimmte Spitzenpolitiker. Die Volkswut will kanalisiert werden. 👇

👍14🔥72🤔2

1 Aug 2026, 05:08 UTC≈1,910 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @liepsenverlag

Viele schlaue Köpfe arbeiten daran, regionale Kriege so miteinander zu verknüpfen, dass daraus ein globaler Flächenbrand wird. https://apolut.net/vom-regionalkrieg-zum-globalen-flachenbrand-von-hermann-ploppa/

👍8😢83🔥2🤔1

1 Aug 2026, 05:08 UTC≈2,270 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Es mehren sich die Zeichen, dass der große Showdown, der von den Sehern so bezeichnete dritte Krieg, in greifbare Nähe rückt. Nimmt man die Informationen der Palmblattbibliothek hinzu, so sind es Regionalkriege, die wie Eisschollen nebeneinander treiben. Es gäbe aber keinen allumfassenden Weltkrieg. Diese Vorhersagen wie auch von Irlmaier & Co. betonen zudem, dass diese Zerstörung nach etwa einem Jahr beendet sei.

👍19🤔86🌭1

31 Jul 2026, 04:14 UTC≈2,020 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @kaiorak

Niemand will mit diesem Kanzler so weitermachen. In der Partei sollen bereits Wetten laufen, dass der Kanzler zum Jahreswechsel nicht mehr Friedrich Merz heißt. https://nius.de/politik/zerruettung-chaos-kanzlertausch-szenarien-abgang-friedrich-merz

👍131

31 Jul 2026, 04:14 UTC≈1,830 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @kaiorakPhoto

Die Medienkampagne gegen Merz läuft auf Hochtouren. Wird er bis Ende des Monats weg sein? Der Stern stellt ihn in den Schatten – eine klare Botschaft gegen ihn. Und wenn die weiße Person in der Mitte Merz darstellen soll, bedeutet das sinnbildlich: „Du bist weg.“ Der Spiegel zeigt ihn zudem in der Schlüssellochperspektive – ebenfalls eine Botschaft gegen Merz. Wird er das alles aussitzen, so wie Merkel es einst gesch

👍155🥰4

31 Jul 2026, 04:13 UTC≈2,030 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @kaiorak

eindeutiger kann man nicht zeigen, vor 5 Stunden, seine Zeit läuft ab https://www.t-online.de/nachrichten/deutschland/innenpolitik/id_101364912/neue-merz-minister-bricht-der-kanzler-die-verfassung-.html

👍11🥰4

30 Jul 2026, 18:45 UTC≈1,850 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @apolutPhoto

CDU eiskalt ausgemerzt: Der Kanzler provoziert den Basis-Aufstand! | Von Janine Beicht Ein politischer Totalschaden offenbart sich vor den Augen der gesamten Nation. Die eigene Fraktion und die Landesverbände verweigern dem Kanzleramt mi ..weiterlesen auf apolut.net #Artikel@apolut | Folge @apolut auf Telegram

😁12👍72

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @derlichteTag. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Der lichte Tag” (@derlichteTag), 3,570 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/derlichteTag.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.