Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Designic | Искусство офиса

Channel

Designic | Искусство офиса

@designic_int

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

445subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001922331007
TypeChannel
Username@designic_int
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/designic_int

Growth

442453447.57 August 2026 — 442 subscribers8 August 2026 — 442 subscribers16 August 2026 — 452 subscribers23 August 2026 — 453 subscribers31 August 2026 — 452 subscribers10 September 2026 — 445 subscribers4457 August 202610 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 34 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 440–455 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 07:38445-7
31 Aug 2026, 00:43452-1
23 Aug 2026, 08:18453+1
16 Aug 2026, 06:07452+10
8 Aug 2026, 05:05442no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:58442first reading

Engagement

4 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

31 reactions across 4 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
929.0%
custom 5287661875943733971825.8%
🔥722.6%
🥰412.9%
👏39.68%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 10:57 UTC45 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @anya_sarksPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

3

7 Aug 2026, 10:57 UTC49 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @anya_sarks

Добро пожаловать в нашу студию Designic Недавно у нас в гостях была одна девушка и она сказала, у вас так красиво, что хочется фотографировать каждый уголок… и тут у меня в голове возник вопрос: почему же этот офис вот уже несколько лет не устаревает визуально? Часто мне задают вопрос, какой цикл нового интерьера, сколько лет он останется актуальным? Наш личный пример - 7 лет и он не теряет своей визуальной актуаль

5👏2custom 52876618759437339712

6 Aug 2026, 16:29 UTC67 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤩Собрали детали офисного пространства Avant, которое до сих пор вдохновляет нас своей палитрой 🤩🤩

custom 52876618759437339716🥰4🔥3

3 Aug 2026, 10:52 UTC106 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @leaseandsalePhoto

«Офисная навигация 2026»: какие стратегии выбирает бизнес Петербурга сегодня 23 июля представители крупного и среднего бизнеса (Яндекс, Авито, «Золотое Яблоко», Сбер, МТС и др.) обсудили варианты эффективного использования офисных пространств на мероприятии Nikoliers в Санкт-Петербурге. Партнёрами встречи выступили Element, Smart Group и Designic. Игорь Темнышев, партнёр Nikoliers: Несмотря на то, что до конца 2027

🔥41👏1

Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @designic_int. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Designic | Искусство офиса” (@designic_int), 445 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/designic_int.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.