Интерфейс покинул здание Как чат, голос и агентный ИИ меняют основы UX-дизайна Эльза Хайруллина 🔗 https://designpub.ru/0cfdc63e3402
👍1

Channel
@designpub
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,256subscribers
-61 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001139758619 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @designpub |
| Created | 16 July 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/designpub |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 17:00 | 4,256 | -8 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 16:19 | 4,264 | -9 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:57 | 4,273 | -12 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:25 | 4,285 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:34 | 4,288 | +2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 4,286 | -9 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 19:22 | 4,295 | -9 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:16 | 4,304 | -5 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:46 | 4,309 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 22:12 | 4,312 | -5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:05 | 4,317 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:59 | 4,317 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 28 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
20 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 12 | 60.0% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 20.0% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 10.0% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 5.00% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 5.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @designpub. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 May 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Интерфейс покинул здание Как чат, голос и агентный ИИ меняют основы UX-дизайна Эльза Хайруллина 🔗 https://designpub.ru/0cfdc63e3402
👍1
Телеграм-канал, где ▫️дизайнеры могут опубликовать своё резюме, а также каждый день находить вакансии от прямых заказчиков, от крупных компаний и агентств из проверенных источников ▫️заказчики могут найти исполнителей для своих задач, разместив вакансию Все объявления проверяются, сомнительные материалы не публикуются. Заходите 🤍 @design_job_freelance
👍2🔥1
7 опорных точек в оценке продукта: взгляд со стороны бизнеса, пользователя и дизайна Как сделать продукт, в который влюбляются с первого экрана — простые, но мощные принципы UX-дизайна. Aigul’ Gambarova 🔗 https://designpub.ru/b70d645bbc6b
UX Teddy: «Лучший подход к проектированию многоуровневого бокового меню» https://designpub.ru/c130e9b86149
UX Teddy: «Как работать с большими группами элементов, расположенными на боковой панели» https://designpub.ru/24a783bf55f8
UX Teddy: «Как спроектировать боковую панель, которая сэкономит место на экране» https://designpub.ru/619af5450d77
UX Teddy: «Как группировать элементы на боковой панели, чтобы облегчить их поиск» https://designpub.ru/b443cca7abcd
Igor Shtang: «Разбивка на строки и нежелательные переносы» https://designpub.ru/29ded63d87ab
🔥1
UX Teddy: «Сравнительные таблицы для товаров, услуг и характеристик» https://designpub.ru/1974ccb97b95
UX Teddy: «Как сделать боковое меню удобным для восприятия» https://designpub.ru/579b8d172c21
UX Teddy: «Почему пользователи лучше воспринимают детали через компактные окна, выезжающие в режиме slideover» https://designpub.ru/ed9b6459d0a2
UX Teddy: «Как сделать идеальный дизайн лендинга» https://designpub.ru/e3dabecb2526
👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @designpub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@designpub edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Дизайн-кабак” (@designpub), 4,256 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/designpub.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.