Posted without readable text
❤2

Channel
@detmassagprofi
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,503subscribers
-58 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001399396752 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @detmassagprofi |
| Created | Between 1 July 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/detmassagprofi |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 18:15 | 7,503 | -3 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 07:57 | 7,506 | -9 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 18:57 | 7,515 | -6 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 12:57 | 7,521 | -7 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:14 | 7,528 | -5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:35 | 7,533 | +13 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 14:43 | 7,520 | -10 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 21:08 | 7,530 | -3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:48 | 7,533 | -9 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:13 | 7,542 | -6 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 05:46 | 7,548 | -6 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:24 | 7,554 | -8 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:17 | 7,562 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:01 | 7,561 | first reading |
34 posts held, back to 5 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 34 (5 July 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,481 |
| Reactions total | 21 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 22:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
198 reactions across 24 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 103 | 52.0% | |
| ❤ | 74 | 37.4% | |
| 👏 | 12 | 6.06% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 2.53% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 1.01% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.505% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.505% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 198 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Posted without readable text
❤2
Почему я перестала верить в один «волшебный метод» Когда-то мне очень хотелось найти систему, которая объяснит всё. Вот этот метод лучше работает с тонусом. Этот - с кривошеей. Этот - с задержкой развития. Этот специалист говорит: «Нужно делать только так». Другой уверяет: «Нет, только наоборот». И чем больше я училась, тем очевиднее становилось: волшебного метода, который подходит каждому ребёнку, не существует. …
❤3👍2🔥2
Posted without readable text
❤3👍1🔥1
Сегодня захотелось поделиться небольшой мыслью вечером... Когда книга «Матрёшка навыка» начала попадать к первым читателям, я поймала себя на ощущении: это не финальная точка. Не «мы выпустили книгу — и всё». Скорее наоборот. Книга будто открыла новый этап большого разговора. О том, как мы смотрим на развитие ребёнка. Почему навык — это не просто движение. Почему за одним внешним симптомом могут стоять разные при…
❤4
Posted without readable text
Книгу можно читать. А можно разбирать её вместе со мной В закрытом чате читателей первого тиража мы открыли читательский клуб. И я с большим удовольствием читаю первые сообщения. Кто-то пишет, что книга будто говорит моим голосом. Кто-то уже оставляет вопросы на полях. Кто-то сравнивает прочитанное со своей практикой. И именно этого мне хотелось. Чтобы книга не закончилась на последней странице, а стала поводом ду…
❤2🔥1
«Он просто не любит лежать на животе» Эту фразу слышали почти все, кто работает с малышами. Ребёнка выкладывают на живот — и через несколько секунд он начинает хныкать, утыкаться лицом, поджимать руки, выгибаться или сразу требовать, чтобы его перевернули обратно. И очень быстро появляется объяснение: «Не любит». «Капризничает». «Просто надо чаще выкладывать». «Пусть привыкает». Иногда родителям говорят: «Ничего, …
❤6👍1🔥1
Зажатые кулачки у малыша. Что обычно делает специалист? Массирует ладошки. Берёт колючий мячик. Разгибает пальчики. Даёт упражнения на раскрытие кисти. Логично? На первый взгляд — да. Но есть одна проблема: кулачок может быть только тем местом, где мы ВИДИМ симптом. А причина находится совсем в другом месте. Например, на положение кисти могут влиять: — шейные рефлексы; — положение головы и корпуса; — сенсорная сис…
Осторожно: возможен побочный эффект от моей книги "Матрешка навыка" в виде потери остановки, дома и собаки 😂
🔥7
🛍🛍🛍🛍 ПРО РЕФЛЕКСЫ Коллеги, в моем канале очень много полезных материалов - видео, разборов, статей. Для вашего удобства формирую всё в подборки. Сегодня собрала про рефлексы: 🔴Рефлекс Галант 🔴Рефлекс Моро и сенсорная интеграция 🔴Хватательный рефлекс 🔴Рефлекс Моро - друг или враг? 🔴Рефлексы как один из важных слоев "Матрешки навыка" 🔴Рефлексы: интегрировать или оставить как есть? 🔴Рефлекс СШТР или ребенок уже хочет …
🔥20❤3
Что может измениться в вашей работе всего за два дня семинара? Не количество упражнений в вашем арсенале. И не список новых техник. Главное изменение — в том, как вы смотрите на ребёнка и принимаете решение, с чего начинать работу. До семинара часто бывает так: — вижу асимметрию, но не понимаю, что сейчас является ведущей причиной; — знаю отдельно рефлексы, сенсорику, биомеханику, этапы развития — но сложно собрать…
⚡️Сегодня заключительный день, когда книгу «Матрёшка навыка» можно приобрести по цене предзаказа. Завтра стоимость повысится, ждать долгой отправки больше не нужно, книга будет отправляться вам после заказа и передачи в транспортную компанию. Для меня эта книга — не просто печатный формат моей системы. Это та самая профессиональная опора, которой мне очень не хватало в начале пути: не набор упражнений, а понимание,…
Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @detmassagprofi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Профи-Детский массаж-Инна Гладченко” (@detmassagprofi), 7,503 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/detmassagprofi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.