Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Devaka Talk

Channel

Devaka Talk

@devakatalk

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

17,085subscribers

+1,476 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001056497613
TypeChannel
Username@devakatalk
DescriptionКанал по просуванню та оптимізації сайтів під Google. Hard SEO. Зв'язок зі мною: @devaka (Сергій Кокшаров) Реклама: @dv_adv Для донатів: @dv_donate Навчаю у групах. https://webpromoexperts.net/courses/seo-pro-online/
Created29 June 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/devakatalk

Growth

15,55617,08516,320.55 August 2026 — 15,609 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,609 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,605 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,610 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,612 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,606 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,600 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,577 subscribers13 August 2026 — 15,556 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,567 subscribers16 August 2026 — 15,606 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,642 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,691 subscribers19 August 2026 — 15,746 subscribers20 August 2026 — 15,875 subscribers21 August 2026 — 15,962 subscribers22 August 2026 — 16,119 subscribers24 August 2026 — 16,271 subscribers25 August 2026 — 16,485 subscribers26 August 2026 — 16,633 subscribers27 August 2026 — 16,754 subscribers28 August 2026 — 16,880 subscribers29 August 2026 — 16,977 subscribers30 August 2026 — 17,085 subscribers5 August 202630 August 2026
24 measurements spanning 24 days, net +1,476. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,327–17,314 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 08:4417,085+108
29 Aug 2026, 12:0516,977+97
28 Aug 2026, 15:2416,880+126
27 Aug 2026, 13:5416,754+121
26 Aug 2026, 16:2316,633+148
25 Aug 2026, 15:3916,485+214
24 Aug 2026, 15:0516,271+152
22 Aug 2026, 23:2216,119+157
21 Aug 2026, 11:4415,962+87
20 Aug 2026, 11:1515,875+129
19 Aug 2026, 12:5715,746+55
18 Aug 2026, 09:4215,691+49
17 Aug 2026, 12:3715,642+36
16 Aug 2026, 05:4615,606+39
14 Aug 2026, 14:1515,567+11
13 Aug 2026, 03:2815,556-21
12 Aug 2026, 05:1215,577-23
11 Aug 2026, 04:0715,600-6
10 Aug 2026, 04:5115,606-6
9 Aug 2026, 07:5415,612first reading

Engagement

74 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.6%
avg views ÷ 17,085 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,980
66 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.794%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
66
of 74 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026
Posts held74 (28 July 202630 August 2026)
Views total130,804
Reactions total1,038
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Aug 2026, 14:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,740
Videos
53
Links
3,810

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
10s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,119 reactions across 71 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍38634.5%
😁29726.5%
17015.2%
🔥1069.47%
💯494.38%
😢474.20%
🤔191.70%
151.34%
🌭141.25%
😱141.25%
👌20.179%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 74 of the 74 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,211reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 74 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 74 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @devakatalk. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 74 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 30 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
10.8%
8 of 74 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
1,990
over 8 measured posts
Median views · rest
2,040
over 66 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.

Measured over the 74 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 30 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 18:11 UTC≈1,350 views25 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Прикол. В мережі ходить зараз фото, де дизайнер розробив одяг з узором, який заважає ШІ розпізнавати обличчя. Купа лайків та репостів. Популярність дизайнеру. Тим часом, Google Vision AI розпізнає все дуже чудово, і обличчя і об'єкти ))

😁232

28 Aug 2026, 19:25 UTC≈1,040 views10 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Forwarded from @SEOBAZAPhoto

✨ П'ятничні новини: ✨ ⠀ Marcus покинув чат. LinkedIn тепер об'єднує аутричерів у групові чати: якщо п'ятеро пишуть тій самій людині за добу, всі летять в одну групу. Marcus, якщо ти це читаєш, повернись. ⠀ 🟢 Google з 30 серпня вимикають ручні санкції за паразитне SEO для європейських користувачів: та сама сторінка може бути понижена для американця і нормально ранжуватись для німця, а санкції в консолі лишаються, прос

8👍2

28 Aug 2026, 16:10 UTC≈1,330 views2 reactionsread 30 August 2026

SEO стрім з новинами через 20 хв. Чекаємо на вас! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hJNUcwQFj4Q Cпонсор - redmantu.com — лідген-платформа з моніторингом Reddit за заданими ключовими словами та сабреддітами. Автоматично знаходить обговорення з потенційним комерційним інтересом.

👍2

28 Aug 2026, 12:56 UTC≈1,460 views5 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

DataForSEO кажуть, що вже давно порішали проблему з /goto урлами в гуглі. Цікаво, як? Але класно, що парсери працюють в штатному режимі :) Чекаємо відповідь від Google!

5

28 Aug 2026, 07:28 UTC≈1,410 views5 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

🔥 ПОСИЛАННЯ Є, А GOOGLE ЇХ НЕ БАЧИТЬ? Тоді навіщо чекати тижнями? 😏 🤖 IndexFastBot — https://t.me/IndexFastBot інструмент для роботи з індексацією посилань прямо в Telegram. ⚡️ Додавай URL ⚡️ Запускай процес ⚡️ Контролюй результат Ідеально для тих, хто працює з: 🔹 SEO та лінкбілдингом 🔹 PBN і сателітами 🔹 великою кількістю URL 🔹 новими сторінками та сайтами 💣 Менше ручної роботи → більше швидкості → більше можли

👍3🌭2

27 Aug 2026, 10:24 UTC≈1,520 views7 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Forwarded from @collaborator_officialPhoto

Якому показнику трасту сайту довіряти: дослідження 40 000 сайтів DR, DA, TF, CF, AS чи SDR — чи справді всі вони показують приблизно одне й те саме? Разом із Сергієм Кокшаровим ми провели кореляційний аналіз 7 SEO-метрик на вибірці понад 40 000 сайтів із різних регіонів і сегментів трафіку Результати можуть змінити ваш підхід до оцінки донорів 👀 Ключові висновки — у відео від Сергія Кокшарова У дослідженні розіб

👍51😁1

27 Aug 2026, 08:04 UTC≈1,810 views5 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Які LLM маркують генерований контент

😢5

26 Aug 2026, 15:14 UTC≈1,760 views7 reactionsread 30 August 2026

О 18:30 новий лайв від гарних дівчат про RAG для SEO. 🟢 Що RAG реально дає SEO 🟢 Чи потрібна векторна база вашому сайту 🟢 Як RAG покращує контент, перелінковку й programmatic SEO 🟢 Чи допомагає це потрапляти у відповіді LLM 🟢 Як зібрати перший MVP без складної та дорогої архітектури ⠀ В ефірі Саша Хілова, Віра Сєчкіна і Олеся Коробка. ⠀ На стрімі також буде розігриш квитка на SERP Conf від спонсора Collaborator. Пі

7

26 Aug 2026, 12:07 UTC≈1,670 views9 reactionsread 30 August 2026

Всім привіт) Сподіваюсь, що ви вже глянули випуск з Ксенією, бо я приніс наступну серію) Цього разу в гості завітала Яна Шульга. На таймлайні є chapters для більш зручної навігації, обирайте те що цікаво послухати, бо тем підняли багато 🙂 https://youtu.be/BvT0XexlHNY?si=eo2Oibhlj_XIR7Zc Також є spotify, для тих кому зручніший аудіо-формат: https://open.spotify.com/episode/7rsKCgmpewaVhXv64pAd1U?si=MCC6NBxCTO2hJZB

9

26 Aug 2026, 08:08 UTC≈1,610 views2 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Boost360° SEO Edition 2.0 — благодійна конференція від Boosta 📅 16 вересня, 11:00 (Київ) 💻 Онлайн + офлайн-афтепаті у Варшаві Практичні доповіді, панель про побудову бізнесів і нові формати без слайдів — SEO News, Hot Seat, Linkbuilding Bingo. 🔥 Спікери: Дмитро Бондар (Boosta), Анастасія Красюкова (UPCONR), Сергій Кокшаров (DevakaTalk), Ігор Шулежко (Rankup), Яна Шульга (Semscale), Світлана Величко (Links-Stream) т

1👍1

25 Aug 2026, 19:43 UTC≈1,750 views12 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Знайшов на одному зі своїх сайтів посилання з Grokipedia 😳 І зрозумів, чому в них постійно гойдалки по трафіку. Не за рахунок AI контенту, а за рахунок постійного мерехтіння сторінок. Вони то з'являються, то видаляються. Немає стабільності ) С початку року ними було видалено сотні тисяч сторінок. Цікаво, що трафік почав повертатись з травня. Але потім знов щось пішло не так. P.S. Кому потрібен аудит - звертайтесь!

👍102

Showing the 12 most recent of 74 posts we hold for @devakatalk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 27,246 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Devaka Talk” (@devakatalk), 17,085 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/devakatalk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.