#南城 晓晓 (新人可🐍) 600一 1200二 电报: @xxixxo88 机器人 :@xiaoxiaoasd_bot 频道:https://t.me/xiaoxiaoghk88 更多资源: @DG98JTbot 出击报告(置顶模版): @DG98jituan

Channel
东莞公开榜2.0
@dg98JT88
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
20,837subscribers
+1,785 since we began measuring on 26 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001063009959 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dg98JT88 |
| Description | 更多资源: @DG98JTbot Hello @Telegram My channel has not violated the rules and policy of using Telegram. Please pay attention. @rove |
| Created | Between 1 May 2016 and 28 February 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 26 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 45 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dg98JT88 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 12:52 | 20,837 | +44 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 11:08 | 20,793 | +43 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 08:09 | 20,750 | +8 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 09:21 | 20,742 | +19 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 11:17 | 20,723 | +21 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 12:08 | 20,702 | +35 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 09:05 | 20,667 | +8 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 11:56 | 20,659 | +23 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 13:39 | 20,636 | +2 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 15:55 | 20,634 | +16 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 16:22 | 20,618 | +16 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 16:55 | 20,602 | +36 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 17:41 | 20,566 | +36 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 20:30 | 20,530 | +15 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 17:51 | 20,515 | +38 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 14:55 | 20,477 | +25 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 17:57 | 20,452 | +27 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 14:39 | 20,425 | +25 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 10:56 | 20,400 | +18 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 12:57 | 20,382 | first reading |
Engagement
84 posts held, back to 26 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.11%
- avg views ÷ 20,837 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 439
- 30 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 30
- of 84 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 84 (26 August 2026 – 8 November 2026) |
| Views total | 13,168 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 15:11 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈25,900
- Videos
- ≈5,100
- Links
- ≈4,990
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 8m 54s
- Average length
- 9s
Measured directly from 57 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 30 posts held from the last 30 days (3.33%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
#大朗 丹妮可 P600 PP1200 私信:@danni16888889 频道:https://t.me/danni168888899 双向:@danni16888889_bot 更多资源: @DG98JTbot 出击报告(置顶模版): @DG98jituan
#东城 小小苍井空 600一 1200二 私聊:@Canjinkon1 双向:@Canglaoshi123bot 频道:https://t.me/shhtt520/20 更多资源: @DG98JTbot 出击报告(置顶模版): @DG98jituan
#虎门 花花 700一 1300二 电报: @huahua666682 双向:@huahuahuadqjrbot 频道:https://t.me/huahuasj787 更多资源: @DG98JTbot 出击报告(置顶模版): @DG98jituan
#南城 奶羞羞 600一 1100二 电报: @xiuxiu657 频道:@xiuxiu796 双向:@xiuxiu78bot 更多资源: @DG98JTbot 出击报告(置顶模版): @DG98jituan
#大朗 曦儿 500一 900二 私信: @xier389 双向: @danji69bot 频道: @xier783 更多资源: @DG98JTbot 出击报告(置顶模版): @DG98jituan
#南城 冉冉 700一 1400二 机器人🤖:@ranranzs_bot 频道:https://t.me/rnfse_hebd 私聊:@ranran8860 公开链接: @DG98JTbot 出击报告(置顶模版): @DG98jituan
#大朗 洋洋 500P 1000PP 频道: t.me/Ayangyang88 双向:@Ayangyangbotbot 私信:@Ayangyang66 更多资源: @DG98JTbot 出击报告(置顶模版): @DG98jituan
#南城 晓晓 (新人可🐍) 600一 1200二 电报: @xxixxo88 机器人 :@xiaoxiaoasd_bot 频道:https://t.me/xiaoxiaoghk88 更多资源: @DG98JTbot 出击报告(置顶模版): @DG98jituan
#虎门 小倩 500一 900二 电报:@laty236 频道:https://t.me/yuehj76 机器人:@yyuir76Bot 更多资源: @DG98JTbot 出击报告(置顶模版): @DG98jituan
#大朗 小柔 500一 1000二 频道:https://t.me/huihuiqq12 双向:@huihui12bot 私信:@huihuimm12 公开链接: @DG98JTbot 出击报告(置顶模版): @DG98jituan
#大朗 洋洋 500P 1000PP 频道: t.me/Ayangyang88 双向:@Ayangyangbotbot 私信:@Ayangyang66 更多资源: @DG98JTbot 出击报告(置顶模版): @DG98jituan
Showing the 12 most recent of 84 posts we hold for @dg98JT88. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@DG98jituan · 13,21483 posts东莞98集团群管家
@DG98JTbot · 11,98383 posts晓晓个人频道
@xiaoxiaoghk88 · 1,4336 posts🌸小柔🌸的私人空间
@huihuiqq12 · 2144 posts苍老师小窝
@shhtt520 · 3,8003 posts小敏~抓🐉筋频道
@humenjin52 · 2,7212 posts是萌萌哇😊
@menmgj · 7592 posts秋雅🉑拍摄个人频道🥰
@qiuya66688 · 6142 posts南城:(欢欢刚满18🌷)小屋🏘️
@sggsh56 · 1,1612 posts苏禾的后宫🧚♀
@suhegk · 1,8062 posts东莞曦儿
@xier783 · 6362 posts月叶的后宫
@Yueye123456 · 2,1622 posts南城叶枝花个人带教室上课
@abc023783 · 2,8631 post虎门纯子的个人花园
@chunzi33121 · 1,3491 post咪莎课堂
@cvbbvbnnmnvbnnvvb · 2771 post东莞常平红颜(休假中)
@hongyanlaoshi · 4,1181 post莉莉:🩷技师房🩷
@jsjsmsh63 · 3,8151 post东莞妮妮的Svip
@nini80907 · 2,8921 post东莞 虎门橙橙 个人兼职💗💗
@putianyueyue678 · 2,2641 post欣欣
@smdekks20 · 6731 post淘淘的后宫😚
@taotaokh · 761 post小小佳宝贝
@xiaoxiaojia976 · 4551 post南城小湿妹的大家庭
@xsm0101 · 3021 post妍希朋友圈
@Yanxi799 · 2,4781 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 2
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@dg98JT88 named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 2 September 2026 – 2 September 2026 · confirmed gone 1 November 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 2 September 2026 – 2 September 2026 · confirmed gone 14 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东莞公开榜2.0” (@dg98JT88), 20,837 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dg98JT88.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.