Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 东莞防诈骗黑板

Channel

东莞防诈骗黑板

@dgfzp

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

364subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 19 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002651009896
TypeChannel
Username@dgfzp
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded19 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/dgfzp

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 46% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

359364361.519 August 2026 — 361 subscribers19 August 2026 — 361 subscribers20 August 2026 — 360 subscribers27 August 2026 — 359 subscribers4 September 2026 — 360 subscribers12 September 2026 — 364 subscribers19 August 202612 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 25 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 358–365 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 23:19364+4
4 Sept 2026, 02:39360+1
27 Aug 2026, 17:43359-1
20 Aug 2026, 05:12360-1
19 Aug 2026, 07:15361no change
19 Aug 2026, 07:00361first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 6 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5s
Average length
5s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

8 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
562.5%
👍337.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2025 to 24 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Feb 2026, 04:27 UTC≈2,840 views1 reactionsread 19 August 2026

常平思思 @AriesFeng41 号被用来诈骗定金,请各位群友朋友勿相信!

1

11 Feb 2026, 15:16 UTC634 views1 reactionsread 19 August 2026

给了定金200,后续支付宝给了500,总共700诈骗

1

11 Feb 2026, 15:16 UTC632 views1 reactionsread 19 August 2026

【辣辣的牛子研究中心】三个人做诈骗,在厚街寮厦站大江阳光一号,做这个定金200诈骗

1

1 Feb 2026, 07:37 UTC679 viewsread 19 August 2026
Photo

冒充我的骗子,大家不要信并举报骚扰并退出

16 Nov 2025, 07:56 UTC993 viewsread 19 August 2026
Photo

缅北骗子,被骗 200+800=1000,请大家务必约课认准榜上老师!

1 Oct 2025, 09:25 UTC≈1,360 views3 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

傻逼鸡婆貌似是代聊,看人下菜,我第一次见,谁去谁吃屎💩。 人照0,服务态度差的臭🐔,原名厚街慧慧、现名厚街珍珍 鸡婆号:@huihui101423 鸡婆频道: @huihui101324

👍3

6 Aug 2025, 01:22 UTC≈2,060 views2 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

骗子骗客户定金,大家留意一下

2

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @dgfzp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“东莞防诈骗黑板” (@dgfzp), 364 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dgfzp.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.