Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for later creatе́r

Channel

later creatе́r

@di_va222

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

34subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003587562987
TypeChannel
Username@di_va222
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/di_va222

Growth

343735.510 August 2026 — 36 subscribers10 August 2026 — 35 subscribers10 August 2026 — 35 subscribers17 August 2026 — 37 subscribers25 August 2026 — 35 subscribers31 August 2026 — 37 subscribers9 September 2026 — 35 subscribers16 September 2026 — 34 subscribers10 August 202616 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 37 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 34–37 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 06:1834-1
9 Sept 2026, 05:3635-2
31 Aug 2026, 14:0337+2
25 Aug 2026, 05:2435-2
17 Aug 2026, 22:2737+2
10 Aug 2026, 23:1735no change
10 Aug 2026, 21:2735-1
10 Aug 2026, 06:0036first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 14 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

115 reactions across 4 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53484685196819482052420.9%
custom 53459195682609297162118.3%
custom 53462423092834192721916.5%
custom 5393489663958743894119.57%
custom 528503415482250660997.83%
custom 540484057103233960897.83%
custom 521563860298946279186.96%
custom 540884986287360243386.96%
custom 524918189384429186032.61%
custom 544733806554043877321.74%
custom 537315882637777917510.87%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 115 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 23:49 UTC27 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

‘’ Post ⌗ 19 реакции поставите когда я прем куплю, сейчас влом

Signed diva

27 Jul 2026, 19:51 UTC123 views33 reactionsread 10 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 539348966395874389411custom 534624230928341927210custom 53484685196819482058custom 53459195682609297162custom 54088498628736024331custom 54473380655404387731

Signed diva

27 Jul 2026, 19:51 UTC123 views0 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

‘’ Post ⌗ 18 слишком большой текст оказался..

Signed diva

24 Jul 2026, 18:09 UTC109 views29 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

‘’ Post ⌗ 17 умом✔️

custom 534591956826092971611custom 53462423092834192728custom 53484685196819482056custom 52491818938442918602custom 53731588263777791751custom 54473380655404387731

Signed diva

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @di_va222. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“later creatе́r” (@di_va222), 34 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/di_va222.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.