Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Esoterica 🇺🇦

Channel

Esoterica 🇺🇦

@diaesoterica

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

26,879subscribers

+736 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002123937094
TypeChannel
Username@diaesoterica
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/diaesoterica

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

35,800 average views per post against 26,879 subscribers — an engagement rate of 133.0%. Across the 1,132 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,210–31,590 subscribers, posting mainly in Ukrainian — the middle half sit between 9.84% and 26.0%, with a median of 16.5%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (27 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Posts measured19 of 20 published in the window (0 exact, 19 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled679,300
Mature posts only137.0% over 18 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers26,879 measured 26 September 2026
Cohortb10000:ukr · 1,132 channels · p10 5.82% · p25 9.84% · p50 16.5% · p75 26.0% · p90 37.2%
Position in cohort99.646th percentile · 8.1× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.109% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageUkrainian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 26 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

26,14326,87926,5117 August 2026 — 26,143 subscribers7 August 2026 — 26,143 subscribers9 August 2026 — 26,145 subscribers10 August 2026 — 26,150 subscribers11 August 2026 — 26,156 subscribers13 August 2026 — 26,163 subscribers14 August 2026 — 26,169 subscribers16 August 2026 — 26,166 subscribers17 August 2026 — 26,169 subscribers18 August 2026 — 26,171 subscribers19 August 2026 — 26,177 subscribers20 August 2026 — 26,183 subscribers22 August 2026 — 26,202 subscribers23 August 2026 — 26,224 subscribers24 August 2026 — 26,245 subscribers26 August 2026 — 26,247 subscribers26 August 2026 — 26,256 subscribers27 August 2026 — 26,282 subscribers28 August 2026 — 26,295 subscribers29 August 2026 — 26,340 subscribers30 August 2026 — 26,347 subscribers31 August 2026 — 26,436 subscribers1 September 2026 — 26,495 subscribers2 September 2026 — 26,521 subscribers4 September 2026 — 26,556 subscribers6 September 2026 — 26,573 subscribers9 September 2026 — 26,740 subscribers12 September 2026 — 26,773 subscribers13 September 2026 — 26,805 subscribers15 September 2026 — 26,812 subscribers17 September 2026 — 26,818 subscribers26 September 2026 — 26,879 subscribers7 August 202626 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 49 days, net +736. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,033–26,989 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 05:1726,879+61
17 Sept 2026, 08:5926,818+6
15 Sept 2026, 07:2026,812+7
13 Sept 2026, 19:3926,805+32
12 Sept 2026, 03:1826,773+33
9 Sept 2026, 19:3826,740+167
6 Sept 2026, 09:5526,573+17
4 Sept 2026, 04:1926,556+35
2 Sept 2026, 18:4426,521+26
1 Sept 2026, 18:5526,495+59
31 Aug 2026, 19:1526,436+89
30 Aug 2026, 17:3426,347+7
29 Aug 2026, 20:3526,340+45
28 Aug 2026, 18:4826,295+13
27 Aug 2026, 18:5726,282+26
26 Aug 2026, 21:0426,256+9
26 Aug 2026, 00:3926,247+2
24 Aug 2026, 23:0726,245+21
23 Aug 2026, 12:1926,224+22
22 Aug 2026, 01:4726,202first reading

Engagement

43 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
133.0%
avg views ÷ 26,879 subscribers
Avg views / post
35,800
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.26%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 43 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026
Posts held43 (21 July 2026 – 23 September 2026)
Views total679,300
Reactions total28,907
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken24 Sept 2026, 06:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
21s
Average length
21s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

64,354 reactions across 42 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🙏36,55056.8%
🔥10,74916.7%
😢5,8299.06%
🥰3,7025.75%
👍2,3123.59%
💯1,1501.79%
🤣1,0411.62%
🤬1,0051.56%
😱8981.40%
🤔5700.886%
🕊4040.628%
🌚1180.183%
🤩160.025%
🏆100.016%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 64,354 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
31
across the posts below
Posts paid on
14
of 42 we hold a reading for · 33%
Most on one post
9
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @diaesoterica. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 43 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2026 to 23 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

23 Sept 2026, 17:49 UTC≈16,600 views967 reactions1 Starread 24 September 2026

Щодо війни в Європі Гібридна війна вже там йде. Буде все те саме. Дрони залітають? Залітають. Бомблять? Поки ні, почнуть лише на фоні загострення. Для європейців війна - це вторгнення. А зайти хіба що може мала група "спасєнія" чи диверсантів. Буде більше диверсій і дронів щодня. Всі вже звикли до цього. Сьогодні знову десь дрон літав в Європі, вертоліт залетів. Хто в Європі сказав, що це війна? Це звичайна серед…

💯786🙏103👍43🤔18😢11🌚6

20 Sept 2026, 16:41 UTC≈29,400 views1,416 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

Розвідка повідомляє про загрозу нової масованої атаки. Ми про цей період писали завчасно 29 серпня. 9–11 вересня - першу атаку з залученням стратегічної авіації пережили, однак тоді удар був зосереджений переважно на 2-3 областях країни. Цього разу, за нашим прогнозом, географія атаки буде значно ширшою та може охопити більше областей України. Ще хочемо додати! По реактивним також робили прогноз, він незмінний. В…

🙏1,260😢101🤬31🕊15👍8🏆1

14 Sept 2026, 15:24 UTC≈39,300 views1,310 reactionsread 24 September 2026

Україна погодилася не атакувати російські об'єкти енергетичної інфраструктури. Росія, у свою чергу, погодилася на те ж саме, — Трамп. Наш прогноз в серпні 👇🏻 Отже, глянули Мораторій на удари по енергетиці Так!! Дійсно, говорили. І що цікаво домовленість про обмеження ударів по енергетиці може бути принаймні оформлена, але … дуже багато але… нормально і стабільно працювати вона, скоріше за все, не буде. Ось так ос…

🤣1,020🙏136🌚66🤔47😢29🤬11👍1

14 Sept 2026, 08:47 UTC≈31,000 views1,370 reactionsread 24 September 2026

Чи буде нестача ліків в Україні? Чи простежується критична ситуація через атаки на фармацевтичну галузь? Ні, тривалої нестачі ліків в Україні не буде. Можуть бути тимчасові затримки з доставкою всередині країни. Локальний дефіцит, але не тривалий. І ще певний час буде невизначеність і перебудова логістики. Загалом, нам по картам показує, що підготувалися компанії до таких ризиків. Те ж саме було і з продуктами ха…

👍762🙏555🥰26🕊25🤔2

13 Sept 2026, 17:55 UTC≈31,300 views2,028 reactionsread 24 September 2026

Чому під час однієї й тієї самої війни одні люди виїжджають за тисячі кілометрів, а інші залишаються жити під обстрілами? Хтось виїхав у перші дні й досі не повернувся. Хтось почав нове життя в іншій країні. Хтось виїхав, але згодом повернувся додому. А хтось, попри все, навіть не уявляє себе в іншому місці. В езотериці це пояснюється набагато простіше. Події, які відбуваються в нашому житті, не існують окремо одн…

🙏1,580👍190🥰100🔥74💯48🕊15😢11🤔6

12 Sept 2026, 13:39 UTC≈25,000 views2,524 reactionsread 24 September 2026

Страшне що робиться по всій країні. Вночі гатили балістикою по великим містам… кадри з Одеси жахливі 😢 В день терор шахедами.. Цим постійним терором нас хочуть зламати. Хочуть виснажити, залякати, зламати нашу стійкість і здатність триматися. І, на жаль, весь вересень буде таким важким, напруженим і виснажливим. Сил нам всім це витримати 🫂🙏

🙏2,060😢367🤬48🕊25😱13🔥5🥰5👍1

11 Sept 2026, 17:31 UTC≈29,500 views2,057 reactionsread 24 September 2026

Щось тривожно всередині. Будуть тварі бити балістикою. Сьогодні в ніч, або з суботи на неділю. Погані карти та енергії. Єдине, що обмежено. Блін.. страшно навіть вже таке писати.. дожилися … 😢 Просто якщо порівнювати з тим, коли по 17-20 шт на Київ та область запускали, то цього разу показує що менше буде. Але від цього не легше..

🙏1,460😢376😱177🤬37🕊7

8 Sept 2026, 18:00 UTC≈37,800 views576 reactionsread 24 September 2026

Чи буде зниження мобілізаційного віку до 55 років? Тема жива по енергіям і дійсно активно обговорюється..але чинна система ще буде тримати певний час так, як є. Можуть бути винятки лише. Скоріш за все буде зміна самого підходу мобілізації старших чоловіків..🧐

🙏474🤔71👍17🤬14

8 Sept 2026, 17:46 UTC≈35,900 views867 reactionsread 24 September 2026

Чи буде тристороння зустріч США-Украіна-росія? Так, буде! Спочатку буде затримка, складне погодження, але зберуться всі разом.

🙏732🥰50👍45🤔26🤬9🔥4🤣1

8 Sept 2026, 17:37 UTC≈35,800 views991 reactionsread 24 September 2026

Чи буде балістика діставати Захід країни ? Так, буде! Прогноз невтішний. Новий початок для них. Не масово, але точково та боляче.

😢709🙏194🤬67😱18🌚3

8 Sept 2026, 17:31 UTC≈33,200 views893 reactionsread 24 September 2026

Чи буде енергетичне перемирʼя ? Ні! Повноцінного та тривалого перемирʼя не буде. Бачимо деякі домовленості, але але вони крихкі. Може щось бути обмежено, тимчасово… Якось так ..

😢664🙏197🤬28👍4

7 Sept 2026, 16:28 UTC≈38,400 views530 reactionsread 24 September 2026

Вже всі пишуть, що протягом 72 годин буде масовий обстріл по країні. Ми вас попереджали раніше 👇🏻 ВЕРЕСЕНЬ (загально для України) Отже, у вересні ми бачимо дві основні критичні точки щодо загрози обстрілів. 🔴 Перша: з 9 по 11 вересня. 🔴 Друга: з 21 по 26 вересня. Цей період виглядає ще важчим. Особливо обережними будьте в ніч з 21 на 22 та з 22 на 23 вересня. Саме тут проходять одні з найважчих енергій місяця. Можл…

🙏478😢43🤬5🔥4

Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @diaesoterica. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Esoterica 🇺🇦” (@diaesoterica), 26,879 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/diaesoterica.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.