to get back into my heart, you’ll have to break my ribs
custom 51929454303164604582custom 52401952674829019372
Signed dí

Channel
@dianaspoems
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
798subscribers
+25 since we began measuring on 16 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001250667907 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dianaspoems |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 16 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dianaspoems |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 12:21 | 798 | +31 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 22:20 | 767 | -2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:37 | 769 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:24 | 771 | -3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:38 | 774 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:15 | 773 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
96 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5240195267482901937 | 47 | 49.0% | |
| custom 5219917270884567884 | 14 | 14.6% | |
| custom 5192945430316460458 | 11 | 11.5% | |
| custom 5276110887818645810 | 11 | 11.5% | |
| custom 5400317304749714825 | 8 | 8.33% | |
| custom 5229205545684065300 | 5 | 5.21% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 96 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
to get back into my heart, you’ll have to break my ribs
custom 51929454303164604582custom 52401952674829019372
Signed dí
вот так вот🌚🫶
custom 52761108878186458103
Signed dí
У тебя новое сообщение! Ребятки, хотите я скажу вам формулу успеха? Тахаджуд + дуа Когда человек хочет чего-то, но при этом не встает на Тахаджуд - значит не так уж и сильно он этого хочет. Проооооосто вы даже не представляете (наверное) как сильно жизнь меняется, когда делаешь Тахаджуд + дуа конечно же. Проооооосто это настолько круто, что Творец дал нам такую чудесную возможность. Поэтому ребятки, берите на за…
custom 52401952674829019375custom 52761108878186458103
Signed dí
dianafreedom pinned «анонимные вопросики🎀»
когда случается что-то серьезное, мрачное, от чего мир реально становится другим, я делаю так: очень сильно обесцениваю эту жизнь то есть изначально как все работает: ситуация кажется огромной, значимой, важной, разрушающей; жизнь - очень серьезной, вечной, так же значимой потом садимся и размышляем.. что есть мир? жизнь? человек? мы проживаем ничтожные 65-70 лет и потом тысячелетиями лежим под землей, так? если …
custom 52401952674829019379custom 52292055456840653005custom 54003173047497148252custom 52761108878186458101
Signed dí
У тебя новое сообщение! Стих посвящённый манипулятору,который одним поступком перевернул мою жизнь. Внутренний хаос и нервные срывы уже частый гость в моей голове. «Что нужно тебе?» — я не знаю ответа. Контроль твой удушлив, как петля на шее. Ты видишь, во мне угасает полсвета, И смех мой звучит холодней и мертвее. Ты медленно, грубо ломаешь мне крылья, Твой взгляд я ловлю в каждом темном углу. Ты чувствуешь это? И…
custom 52401952674829019371
Signed dí
тысячу раз спасибо за такие слова! считайте, что очень крепко Вас обняла и прижала к сердцу🫂🫂🫂 порой мне самой этого не хватает, поэтому хочется дарить это тепло через слова🤍
Signed dí
У тебя новое сообщение! Читаю ваши посты и сердце наполняется теплом и уютом ❤️🩹 Как-то думала что потеряла вас,но опять нашла и так рада Спасибо за прекрасные посты,не знаю почему но кажется они лечать душу,дают покой,чувство будто тебя кто-то обнял и прижал к сердцу 🫀💭 ↩️ Свайпни для ответа.
custom 52761108878186458103custom 52199172708845678842custom 52401952674829019372
Signed dí
анонимные вопросики🎀
Signed dí
вы знаете, что нельзя провоцировать эмпатов? не просто эмпатичных людей, а вот сильнейших эмпатов, которые такими стали не от хорошей жизни, а ради выживания. честное слово, если нарциссичный человек спровоцирует эмпата и второй (естественно, видя ВСЕ слабости первого) начнет говорить — нарциссу конец. всё его фейковое нутро будет вывернуто наизнанку от количества правды, которой он боится, как смерти. нарциссы не л…
custom 52401952674829019375custom 52199172708845678842
Signed dí
Иногда люди могут ощущаться, как дом. Надо мне наверное как-то научиться хотя бы стучать, а не выбивать дверь ногой, мчась к камину, чтобы согреться. А то что-то происходит потом.. то ли искры из него до ковра долетают сами, то ли я близко к огню подхожу и провоцирую пожар.. Дом горит, а убежать не успеваешь. Либо успеваешь, но обжигаешься. Теперь буду стучаться🌚
custom 52401952674829019374custom 54003173047497148251
Signed dí
эт мой второй после Диснея вайб
Signed dí
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dianaspoems. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“dianafreedom” (@dianaspoems), 798 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dianaspoems.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.