Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Диденок и его блог

Channel

Диденок и его блог

@didenokbook

Verified by TelegramNot marked by Telegram, checked 9 September 2026

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,017subscribers

-247 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002223141120
TypeChannel
Username@didenokbook
DescriptionДиденок и его блог и его Бог. Этот канал не предназначен для того, чтобы кого-то задеть или огорчить! †
Created3 June 2024 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/didenokbook

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

8,0178,2658,1416 August 2026 — 8,264 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,265 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,250 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,240 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,246 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,218 subscribers23 August 2026 — 8,204 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,196 subscribers29 August 2026 — 8,194 subscribers1 September 2026 — 8,181 subscribers5 September 2026 — 8,172 subscribers10 September 2026 — 8,151 subscribers14 September 2026 — 8,126 subscribers18 September 2026 — 8,101 subscribers27 September 2026 — 8,065 subscribers5 October 2026 — 8,069 subscribers12 October 2026 — 8,077 subscribers15 October 2026 — 8,070 subscribers18 October 2026 — 8,071 subscribers21 October 2026 — 8,065 subscribers24 October 2026 — 8,051 subscribers26 October 2026 — 8,032 subscribers29 October 2026 — 8,027 subscribers2 November 2026 — 8,024 subscribers4 November 2026 — 8,017 subscribers6 August 20264 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 91 days, net -247. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,980–8,302 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 23:368,017-7
2 Nov 2026, 03:398,024-3
29 Oct 2026, 20:088,027-5
26 Oct 2026, 22:278,032-19
24 Oct 2026, 05:578,051-14
21 Oct 2026, 11:268,065-6
18 Oct 2026, 06:558,071+1
15 Oct 2026, 07:198,070-7
12 Oct 2026, 12:278,077+8
5 Oct 2026, 15:548,069+4
27 Sept 2026, 15:188,065-36
18 Sept 2026, 16:008,101-25
14 Sept 2026, 08:378,126-25
10 Sept 2026, 11:568,151-21
5 Sept 2026, 11:418,172-9
1 Sept 2026, 10:148,181-13
29 Aug 2026, 18:228,194-2
26 Aug 2026, 15:538,196-8
23 Aug 2026, 22:478,204-14
19 Aug 2026, 23:328,218first reading

Engagement

42 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.2%
avg views ÷ 8,017 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,020
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 42 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held42 (27 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total14,115
Reactions total1,615
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 23:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,940
Videos
≈236
Links
≈382

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 58s
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5,546 reactions across 42 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2,71448.9%
🔥84815.3%
❤‍🔥82214.8%
🙏1843.32%
🥰1803.25%
😁1522.74%
😍1492.69%
💘1252.25%
💯1212.18%
🍓621.12%
👍550.992%
👏300.541%
💋250.451%
💔220.397%
🏆150.27%
⚡120.216%
🕊100.18%
🎉90.162%
👎30.054%
🤩20.036%
6 further kinds60.108%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 42 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,546 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 7 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 13:14 UTC965 views283 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Эрика-Элиза говорит: мам, кстати, Верочка родилась вовремя и очень быстро. Прям как мы и молились. Это доказательство, что Бог есть

❤147❤‍🔥59😍58🥰11🔥8

5 Nov 2026, 09:42 UTC≈1,170 views74 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

DIDENÓK TEAM участвует в рейтинге работодателей России от HH. В прошлом году мы заняли 7 место среди небольших компаний и стали №1 среди digital-агентств. Если вам нравится то, что мы делаем, проголосуйте за нас 💙 Как это сделать? 🌟переходите на https://rating.hh.ru/poll 🌟в поиске вводите DIDENÓK TEAM 🌟ставите лайк Голосование до 14 ноября. Спасибо! 🔥

❤37❤‍🔥17🏆15💘4👍1

3 Nov 2026, 09:34 UTC≈4,080 views389 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Мы так долго молились о нашем чуде. Молились о здоровье малышки и о здоровье мамы. Молились обо всех сотрудниках и специалистах. Молились, чтобы это был правильный день и правильное время, чтобы все обстоятельства сложились ровно так, как надо. И должен признаться: Господь ответил на каждую молитву. Особенно это ощутимо в контексте того, что предыдущая беременность замерла и мы потеряли нашего ангелочка. А теперь мы …

❤232🔥83💘51❤‍🔥14🕊9

2 Nov 2026, 13:56 UTC≈1,880 views287 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Вес 3490 53 см Вера-Мария Диденок 01:35 2/11/2026 Апгар 9/9

❤148❤‍🔥65🔥49🥰20👍5

2 Nov 2026, 10:42 UTC≈1,450 views435 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Forwarded from @evadidenokPhoto

Добро пожаловать в нашу семью. Вера-Мария, мы тебя очень ждали 🧡

❤208🔥111❤‍🔥74🥰28🙏14

30 Oct 2026, 16:48 UTC≈2,290 views111 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤47😁27🔥26💯6🍓5

30 Oct 2026, 16:22 UTC≈2,280 views36 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Друзья, это был яркий вечер! Премия ЖАРА Медиа прошла, и наша команда уехала с победами🔥И каждая заслужена трудом людей, которые каждый день делают это вместе. • Маш Милаш Невероятная ведущая премии! Маш, ты задала тон всей церемонии ✨ • Даниэль Вегас Победа в номинации «Выбор VOICE» на премии ЖАРА Медиа. Даня, будет разбито не одно сердце! • Вики Шоу Прекрасный наряд ангела! Вика, ты украсила красную дорожку 🪽 …

❤22🎉9💘5

28 Aug 2026, 17:43 UTC252 views16 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Если не будет «этих» обстоятельств в нашей жизни, то вера наша не будет расти. Мы будем номинальными верующими. Искать будем не Бога а своих путей. Так или не так?

❤16

28 Aug 2026, 06:08 UTC796 views75 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤33😁28🍓12👍1🔥1

27 Aug 2026, 06:06 UTC≈1,150 views48 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Почему нельзя достигать благих целей нечестными методами?

❤28🔥11🙏7☃1🤔1

25 Aug 2026, 15:35 UTC≈1,550 views152 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Молись в день радужного счастья, Пред трудным подвигом молись! Молись, когда грозит несчастье, Когда смущаешься, молись! Молись, когда обиду сносишь, Когда в опасности, молись! Молись, когда за милых просишь, За злого недруга МОЛИСЬ! Молись, когда слабеют силы, Когда возносишься - молись! Молись у дорогой могилы, За жизнь рожденную МОЛИСЬ! Молись в минуту искушенья, Коль победил себя - молись! Молись в печальное м…

❤71🙏35❤‍🔥28🔥17🐳1

25 Aug 2026, 13:08 UTC≈3,790 views17 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

✝️ Обсуждаем 2 главу 2-го Послания к Тимофею со старшим преподавателем Московской духовной академии, директором Издательства Московской духовной академии - Димитрием Серовым 💻Темы выпуска: 🟢Цель не оправдывает нечестные средства! 🟢Бог верен даже если мы нет.. 🟢Обязан ли христианин иметь публичную позицию по каждому спорному вопросу? 🟢Может ли человек, открыто отрекшийся от Христа, вернуться в церковь? Слушайте …

❤9❤‍🔥4👍3🕊1

Showing the 12 most recent of 42 posts we hold for @didenokbook. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

DIDENOK TEAM
@didenokteam · 20,667
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 28 September 2026
Дневник Пастора | Алексей Романов
@romanovpastor · 22,533
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 21 September 2026
Библейские факты 🕊
@biblefacts_org · 19,184
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 3 October 2026
kurchanov_prod
@kurchanov_prod · 1
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 8 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Диденок и его блог” (@didenokbook), 8,017 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/didenokbook.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.