Channel
@difficult_women
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,545subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002103493033 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @difficult_women |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/difficult_women |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 19:37 | 3,545 | +6 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 07:59 | 3,539 | -9 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 20:03 | 3,548 | +2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:58 | 3,546 | +1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 12:16 | 3,545 | -4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:42 | 3,549 | -12 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 08:17 | 3,561 | +4 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 02:11 | 3,557 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:28 | 3,556 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:35 | 3,555 | +4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:37 | 3,551 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 3,551 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
986 reactions across 6 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 394 | 40.0% | |
| ❤ | 159 | 16.1% | |
| 🤬 | 150 | 15.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 94 | 9.53% | |
| 🔥 | 89 | 9.03% | |
| 👏 | 42 | 4.26% | |
| 💔 | 17 | 1.72% | |
| 😱 | 17 | 1.72% | |
| 🤝 | 13 | 1.32% | |
| 😭 | 6 | 0.609% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 0.507% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 986 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Устроить перелом жопы и других частей тела на ровном месте — это, бесспорно, мужской талант. Мне кажется, у них там какие-то тайные соревнования проходят. А последнее видео — буквально оживший мем, там персонаж в конце ещё орёт «проклятые феминистки!!!» Приятного просмотра всем женщинам, отличного настроения и продуктивного дня! #manmoment
🔥68❤🔥19😱10👏5🥰2
В этом обвинении против женщины, рубящей радикальную правду, хорошо видно истинное отношение «хороших мужчин» к насилию над женщинами: ...детектив-констебль Флетчер сказала: «Единственный способ остановить ночные изнасилования — это ввести комендантский час для всех мужчин с 21:00». Детектив-сержант Холл заявил, что (...) счел это замечание оскорбительным: «Это оскорбило меня как мужчину, поскольку подразумевает, ч…
💯140❤64💔17
Чуть перефразирую вопрос из зала: Полагаю, сторонницы антимедицины имеют в виду, что от рака женщину могут излечить существенные деньги, такие, на которые можно оплатить смену обстановки и новый жизненный старт. Например, деньги, на которые можно купить квартиру в другом городе и год не работать, приходя в себя, а после - оплатить новое образование. Против этого следует поставить бессрочный бесплатный абонемент к онк…
💯134❤29👏8🤬3
Тейк, что «нужны просто деньги вместо терапии» сейчас ощущается особенно чудовищным. Потому что в таком состоянии лишь shut up and take my money, только бы отпустило. В данный момент у меня есть доступ к качественной медицинской помощи. Но представим, что у вас есть, например, лишние 5000 рублей. Вы закажете своей любимой еды, оплатите какую-то приятную услугу типа массажа, купите интересные книги, шмотку или потрат…
💯70❤32🤝8🤬3❤🔥2😭1
Всё чаще в женские пространства приходят адепты паприродности — и это уже выглядит как закономерность. — Роды — естественный процесс, не надо его патологизировать и рожать в больнице, роженицы не больны. — Роды в любой момент могут осложниться. Некоторые осложнения прогнозируемы, некоторые внезапны и, что главное, стремительны и смертельны. — Опять пугалки начались! Мы тут рассуждаем о нормальных родах, не надо таши…
🤬144💯50❤27🤝5😭3
Доброе утро, неудобные! Сегодня в рубрике яичные блюда, или «был пацан — и нет пацана». Весело, задорно, с огоньком и характерным звоном встречаем пятничное летнее утро. И пусть ваш день будет полон энергии и позитива 🌈 #manmoment
❤🔥73👏29🔥21❤7😱7🥰3😭2
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @difficult_women. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Неудобные женщины” (@difficult_women), 3,545 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/difficult_women.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.