Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ↻ DIGI ANTI ⇦

Bot

↻ DIGI ANTI ⇦

@digi4bot

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry

542,126monthly users

-8,650 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID5633995061
TypeBot
Username@digi4bot
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held23
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/digi4bot

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

534,722553,706544,2148 August 2026 — 550,776 monthly users8 August 2026 — 550,776 monthly users9 August 2026 — 552,550 monthly users10 August 2026 — 552,869 monthly users12 August 2026 — 552,810 monthly users13 August 2026 — 553,472 monthly users14 August 2026 — 552,966 monthly users16 August 2026 — 552,480 monthly users17 August 2026 — 553,664 monthly users18 August 2026 — 553,386 monthly users19 August 2026 — 553,706 monthly users20 August 2026 — 552,210 monthly users21 August 2026 — 550,654 monthly users23 August 2026 — 544,975 monthly users24 August 2026 — 544,811 monthly users26 August 2026 — 546,323 monthly users28 August 2026 — 534,722 monthly users30 August 2026 — 545,432 monthly users31 August 2026 — 539,174 monthly users1 September 2026 — 540,308 monthly users2 September 2026 — 541,789 monthly users3 September 2026 — 542,698 monthly users5 September 2026 — 542,126 monthly users542,1268 August 20265 September 2026
23 measurements spanning 28 days, net -8,650. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 531,874–556,554 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every monthly users count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)Monthly usersChange
5 Sept 2026, 15:56542,126-572
3 Sept 2026, 12:57542,698+909
2 Sept 2026, 06:08541,789+1,481
1 Sept 2026, 04:18540,308+1,134
31 Aug 2026, 01:25539,174-6,258
30 Aug 2026, 04:04545,432+10,710
28 Aug 2026, 00:54534,722-11,601
26 Aug 2026, 21:58546,323+1,512
24 Aug 2026, 22:23544,811-164
23 Aug 2026, 07:04544,975-5,679
21 Aug 2026, 16:37550,654-1,556
20 Aug 2026, 11:52552,210-1,496
19 Aug 2026, 11:35553,706+320
18 Aug 2026, 12:08553,386-278
17 Aug 2026, 12:13553,664+1,184
16 Aug 2026, 02:04552,480-486
14 Aug 2026, 12:27552,966-506
13 Aug 2026, 00:27553,472+662
12 Aug 2026, 00:53552,810-59
10 Aug 2026, 00:41552,869first reading

Engagement

No post feed to measure. Telegram publishes a readable post stream for channels, not for bots, so views, reactions and engagement rates do not exist for this entry — they are not missing, pending or withheld. The register records what this handle is and what it resolves to.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“↻ DIGI ANTI ⇦” (@digi4bot), 542,126 monthly users as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/digi4bot.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.