Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for дигилитант

Channel

дигилитант

@digilitant

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

175subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001204524220
TypeChannel
Username@digilitant
Created29 December 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/digilitant

Growth

172175173.59 August 2026 — 173 subscribers10 August 2026 — 173 subscribers17 August 2026 — 174 subscribers24 August 2026 — 172 subscribers31 August 2026 — 175 subscribers9 August 202631 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 22 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 172–175 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 02:04175+3
24 Aug 2026, 21:14172-2
17 Aug 2026, 11:23174+1
10 Aug 2026, 08:11173no change
9 Aug 2026, 09:30173first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 7 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 43s
Average length
6m 43s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

144 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🐳2517.4%
custom 54585109719894007792013.9%
🔥1913.2%
🤡1913.2%
💔1510.4%
🗿1510.4%
custom 5352687921323326003149.72%
🕊117.64%
64.17%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 144 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 17:05 UTC72 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Бэйсик бой теперь работает в Яндексе моему миру конец. Кто знает тот знает

🤡5💔2🐳1

3 Aug 2026, 05:42 UTC234 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

ещё одна вакансия, в этот раз для методиста на проектную занятость 🤍 в конце сентября мы проведём образовательный интенсив по критическим исследованиям данных для работников культурных и образовательных организаций. мы давно этой темой занимаемся и немного переживаем, что глаза в мыле; поэтому ищем ищем «внешнего» специалиста, который поможет взглянуть на материалы со стороны и собрать полезный курс для участников

custom 54585109719894007791

1 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC143 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

один миллион непрочитанных, ура

🤡13custom 54585109719894007791

31 Jul 2026, 19:14 UTC148 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Представьте, что рвб это отдельная страна, если будете смотреть. Там такой набор слов используется, который не особо характерен, для риторики руководителя бизнеса

custom 53526879213233260036

31 Jul 2026, 16:40 UTC131 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Издательство АСТ должно передо мной и миром извиниться за обложку, которую они выбрали для издания чудесной книги Кейт Кроуфорд об эяй Просто как блять можно было это сделать КАК Саму книгу я не читал ещё, но надо бы и на перевод посмотреть

custom 54585109719894007798🔥3🕊1

29 Jul 2026, 20:57 UTC161 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @checheviza_chechevitsa

невыносимое очарование бедствия(?) В очередной раз я замечаю, как странно и неожиданно радостно, почти уютно бывает на душе в момент внезапной «катастрофы». Не той, что угрожает жизни, а той, что просто доставляет всем вокруг огромные неудобства. Ливень. Аномальный холод. Потоп. Отключение света или связи. Радость эта — не от страха и не от вида разрушений. Она от того, как быстро чужие становятся своими. Люди сбли

🐳7

29 Jul 2026, 14:56 UTC161 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Ещё мы ищем двух новых коллег: - менеджера программы в магу, бак и аспирантуру - преподавателя и исследователя количественника https://t.me/dhcenter/1062 — дитэилс

🔥2

25 Jul 2026, 16:16 UTC208 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

может вы и знали, но я не знал. когда в 40-е в лабораториях первые ЭВМ начали теснить людей-компьютеров, появилось такое слово — «kilogirl» — единица измерения, обозначающая вычислительную мощность тысячи женщин, работающих в течение часа. существует / или существовал, не ясно, исследовательский коллектив, участницы которого апроприировали это слово и назвались superkilogirls. на их сайте можно найти интересные те

🔥5🐳2custom 54585109719894007792

24 Jul 2026, 17:13 UTC181 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

tl;dr если кратко, то это превью к тексту о том, как теория из критических исследований инфраструктур может помочь понять суверенизацию рунета и лучше въехать в актуальную чехарду с национальными сертификатами. когда-то давно, аж в июне, я решил написать три поста про ситуацию с сертификатами в рунете написал 1 пост с общим контекстом и, естественным образом, затянул со вторым, потому что он всё время обрастал подр

🔥4🕊1

23 Jul 2026, 14:25 UTC148 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @dhcenter

Posted without readable text

🕊3🔥2custom 54585109719894007792

21 Jul 2026, 17:05 UTC197 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Я жертва маркетинга канала @optikfurdinge

🐳5🔥3custom 54585109719894007793🕊1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @digilitant. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“дигилитант” (@digilitant), 175 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/digilitant.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.