Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Brocli: зарубежный фриланс | лайфхаки

Channel

Brocli: зарубежный фриланс | лайфхаки

@digitalbroccoli

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

23,958subscribers

-117 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001142076902
TypeChannel
Username@digitalbroccoli
Created13 July 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/digitalbroccoli

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

23,95624,08524,020.56 August 2026 — 24,075 subscribers6 August 2026 — 24,075 subscribers6 August 2026 — 24,076 subscribers7 August 2026 — 24,078 subscribers8 August 2026 — 24,073 subscribers9 August 2026 — 24,076 subscribers10 August 2026 — 24,072 subscribers11 August 2026 — 24,071 subscribers12 August 2026 — 24,066 subscribers14 August 2026 — 24,064 subscribers15 August 2026 — 24,054 subscribers16 August 2026 — 24,060 subscribers17 August 2026 — 24,071 subscribers18 August 2026 — 24,072 subscribers19 August 2026 — 24,066 subscribers20 August 2026 — 24,058 subscribers22 August 2026 — 24,085 subscribers24 August 2026 — 24,067 subscribers25 August 2026 — 24,061 subscribers26 August 2026 — 24,062 subscribers27 August 2026 — 24,047 subscribers28 August 2026 — 24,046 subscribers29 August 2026 — 24,045 subscribers30 August 2026 — 24,040 subscribers31 August 2026 — 24,035 subscribers1 September 2026 — 24,032 subscribers2 September 2026 — 24,023 subscribers3 September 2026 — 24,015 subscribers4 September 2026 — 24,005 subscribers7 September 2026 — 24,008 subscribers10 September 2026 — 23,976 subscribers12 September 2026 — 23,967 subscribers16 September 2026 — 23,956 subscribers18 September 2026 — 23,958 subscribers23,9586 August 202618 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net -117. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,937–24,104 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 12:3823,958+2
16 Sept 2026, 03:5823,956-11
12 Sept 2026, 17:3923,967-9
10 Sept 2026, 18:1823,976-32
7 Sept 2026, 16:1724,008+3
4 Sept 2026, 15:2124,005-10
3 Sept 2026, 02:0824,015-8
2 Sept 2026, 01:5224,023-9
1 Sept 2026, 00:0524,032-3
31 Aug 2026, 01:3624,035-5
30 Aug 2026, 00:1224,040-5
29 Aug 2026, 03:0424,045-1
28 Aug 2026, 05:4424,046-1
27 Aug 2026, 08:1524,047-15
26 Aug 2026, 05:2524,062+1
25 Aug 2026, 04:1824,061-6
24 Aug 2026, 00:0724,067-18
22 Aug 2026, 06:0924,085+27
20 Aug 2026, 20:0324,058-8
19 Aug 2026, 16:2624,066first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 25 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.26%
avg views ÷ 23,958 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,020
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.882%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026
Posts held18 (25 March 202626 August 2026)
Views total1,020
Reactions total9
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 11:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

538 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁16731.0%
🔥16029.7%
15428.6%
👍254.65%
😱244.46%
😢40.743%
❤‍🔥30.558%
😍10.186%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 538 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 25 March 2026 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 18 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @digitalbroccoli. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 March 2026 to 26 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

26 Aug 2026, 11:02 UTC≈1,020 views9 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Чем дольше работаю на фрилансе, тем сильнее понимаю, что хорошие проекты часто приходят через людей: — кто-то тебя порекомендовал; — с кем-то получилось запартнериться. — а у кого-то появился проект, который он сам не может взять. И один хороший контакт иногда реально приносит больше пользы, чем неделя скроллинга проектов. Недавно нашла крутой закрытый чат «Сливки Фриланса». Там сидят опытные ребята из маркетинга

8😁1

22 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC≈1,480 views49 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

В 2020 я выпустила книгу про фриланс в издательстве. В 2025 договор закончился, и я вернула себе права на нее. Скоро книга «Крутой фрилансер» (бывшие «Записки удаленщика») выйдет под новым названием, с новой обложкой и обновленными данными прямо здесь, в канале ❤️

🔥47😁2

17 Aug 2026, 13:07 UTC≈1,770 views10 reactionsread 3 September 2026

У меня есть классные бесплатные гайды по зарубежному фрилансу в моем боте: @invoice2026bot Но я не понимаю, работает ли он сейчас 😆 Manychat что-то там опять поменял, и неочевидно, видят ли новые юзеры бота контент. Если еще не открывали его, попробуйте: @invoice2026bot и напишите в комменты, пожалуйста, видите ли вы сообщения в боте 🫶 UPD: починили, теперь должно работать!

7😁3

28 Jul 2026, 12:03 UTC≈2,840 views15 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Поделилась в тредсе инструментами, которые использую в работе с заказчиками. Заходите делитесь своими, там в комментах уже накидали классных советов 💓

14😁1

23 Jul 2026, 12:00 UTC≈3,390 views21 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Как специалисту попасть в ИИ? Я бы могла провести целый вебинар об этом (и может быть проведу)), но если начинать с азов, то вот что нужно знать фрилансеру, который хочет попасть в ответы ИИ. 1. Сначала посмотрите, что ИИ-шки уже знают о вас. Вбейти свое имя и, если оно слишком распространенное, специализацию, и оцените ответ. Верно ли ИИ понимает вашу работу? Какие источники использует для ответа? Не путает ли ва

🔥14❤‍🔥32😁1😍1

21 Jul 2026, 17:38 UTC≈2,660 views47 reactions2 Starsread 3 September 2026

Это были тяжелые 3 месяца Я давно тут не появлялась и только сейчас увидела, что прошло уже 3 месяца. За это время я успела пройти через волну разочарований, упасть на дно несколько раз, оттолкнуться от дна почти равное количество раз, потерять близкого человека и почти оправиться в рекордные сроки, потому что нужно жить дальше, работать и заботиться о тех, кто остался. Все это на фоне происходящего в мире сумасшест

40🔥6😁1

29 Apr 2026, 08:29 UTC≈5,060 views31 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Какие посты набирают охваты в LinkedIn? Если в общих чертах — то про ИИ («ИИ сделал мне миллион долларов за пять секуд!»/«Я ненавижу ИИ, он ломает нам жизнь!»), про плохих работодателей или клиентов, про личные офигеть-какие-успехи или жесточайшие провалы — и главное, «а что делать вам, чтобы... (повторить/не повторить/не остаться за бортом)». Но это все общее. Я такое не люблю — слишком уж зависишь от настроения а

🔥169😁6

28 Apr 2026, 08:34 UTC≈3,960 views14 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Как вести LinkedIn, чтобы твои посты получали охваты? Пробовали постить на линкедине, но получали несчастные 100 просмотров? Даже если вы не использовали ИИ (который там сейчас все хаят), даже если вложили душу в пост, даже если написали убийственно цепляющий хук — пост мог не залететь. В LinkedIn не работают стандартные правила соцсетей. Во-первых, это текстовая соцсеть — фишки из рилсов тут не сработают. Во-втор

🔥103😁1

27 Apr 2026, 16:33 UTC≈3,200 views20 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Как набрать первую 1000 на LinkedIn? Люди продают курсы об этом, а я скажу бесплатно: да просто добавляйтесь в коннекты ко всем подряд))) Ну правда — набрать там 1000 коннектов несложно, если просто сидеть и каждый день отправлять кучу запросов. Но оно вам надо? 1000 мертвых душ, которые никогда у вас ничего не купят. Блокировка за спам от LinkedIn. Разочарование от завышенных ожиданий... Вот как на самом деле т

🔥12👍43😁1

25 Apr 2026, 09:51 UTC≈2,790 views6 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Сейчас в подарок к гайду «Зарубежный фриланс» даю урок по построению личного бренда фрилансера 🎁 1. Покупайте гайд по ссылке 2. Переходите в закрытый канал с обновлениями 3. Там увидите ссылку на опрос — после его прохождения можно забрать урок. Напомню, что в гайде рассказываю, как заполнить профили в LinkedIn и на других площадках, как писать отклики и сообщения потенциальным клиентам, и главное — 80 площадок,

3😁3

24 Apr 2026, 14:48 UTC≈2,920 views18 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Вышел 20 пакет санкций ЕС — еще несколько банков отключили, что влияет на работу сервисов с выплатами из валюты в рубли (Mellow и другие). Если вы в РФ и получаете оплату из-за рубежа, ваши варианты: 1. Открыть счет в Райффайзене или ОТП банке — они не попадут в списки, потому что они европейские 2. Удаленно или лично открыть счет за рубежом (проследите, чтобы зарубежного банка тоже не было в списке санкций) 3. П

👍13😁32

23 Apr 2026, 10:45 UTC≈2,820 views81 reactions5 Starsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Самый лучший ответ на вакансию, который я видела в своей жизни 😁

😁4021🔥15👍3😢2

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @digitalbroccoli. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@digitalbroccoli edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
18 August 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Brocli: зарубежный фриланс | лайфхаки” (@digitalbroccoli), 23,958 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/digitalbroccoli.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.