Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Русский диджитал

Channel

Русский диджитал

@digitalrussian

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,542subscribers

-1,522 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001293133372
TypeChannel
Username@digitalrussian
DescriptionРусский диджитал № 5025530657 - номер регистрации в Роскомнадзоре. По всем вопросам @digitalrussianbot
Created26 June 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held56
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/digitalrussian

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 3 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@digitalrussian/3030 · this entry7 May 2026, 10:06 UTC@marketingrussian/18267 May 2026, 10:08 UTC1.002 minutes
@digitalrussian/3032 · this entry8 May 2026, 10:07 UTC@marketingrussian/18288 May 2026, 10:14 UTC1.008 minutes
@digitalrussian/3037 · this entry14 May 2026, 09:11 UTC@marketingrussian/183314 May 2026, 09:16 UTC1.006 minutes
@digitalrussian/3040 · this entry23 Jul 2026, 09:01 UTC@marketingrussian/183623 Jul 2026, 09:07 UTC1.007 minutes
@digitalrussian/3041 · this entry24 Jul 2026, 10:35 UTC@marketingrussian/183724 Jul 2026, 10:37 UTC1.003 minutes
@digitalrussian/3045 · this entry28 Jul 2026, 09:01 UTC@marketingrussian/184128 Jul 2026, 09:12 UTC1.0011 minutes
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@marketingrussian19 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.005 minutesthis entry (18–1)
@promarketings18 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.005 minutesthis entry (17–1)
@marketerbest7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0030 hours@marketerbest (4–3)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 6 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 May 2026 to 30 July 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 4, the earliest publisher we hold is @marketerbest. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 3 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

15,54217,06516,303.56 August 2026 — 17,064 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,065 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,058 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,051 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,049 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,047 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,044 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,043 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,041 subscribers16 August 2026 — 17,036 subscribers17 August 2026 — 17,035 subscribers18 August 2026 — 17,034 subscribers19 August 2026 — 17,033 subscribers20 August 2026 — 17,029 subscribers21 August 2026 — 17,026 subscribers23 August 2026 — 17,023 subscribers25 August 2026 — 17,021 subscribers26 August 2026 — 17,015 subscribers27 August 2026 — 17,014 subscribers29 August 2026 — 17,012 subscribers30 August 2026 — 17,010 subscribers31 August 2026 — 17,008 subscribers1 September 2026 — 17,007 subscribers2 September 2026 — 17,006 subscribers3 September 2026 — 17,001 subscribers5 September 2026 — 17,000 subscribers8 September 2026 — 16,974 subscribers11 September 2026 — 16,955 subscribers13 September 2026 — 16,940 subscribers15 September 2026 — 16,917 subscribers17 September 2026 — 16,905 subscribers25 September 2026 — 16,883 subscribers4 October 2026 — 16,866 subscribers8 October 2026 — 16,857 subscribers12 October 2026 — 16,853 subscribers14 October 2026 — 16,840 subscribers15 October 2026 — 16,832 subscribers16 October 2026 — 16,825 subscribers17 October 2026 — 16,817 subscribers18 October 2026 — 16,807 subscribers19 October 2026 — 16,789 subscribers20 October 2026 — 16,776 subscribers22 October 2026 — 16,756 subscribers23 October 2026 — 16,798 subscribers24 October 2026 — 16,702 subscribers25 October 2026 — 16,637 subscribers26 October 2026 — 16,556 subscribers27 October 2026 — 16,495 subscribers28 October 2026 — 16,437 subscribers28 October 2026 — 16,176 subscribers30 October 2026 — 15,892 subscribers31 October 2026 — 15,713 subscribers1 November 2026 — 15,638 subscribers1 November 2026 — 15,546 subscribers2 November 2026 — 15,543 subscribers3 November 2026 — 15,542 subscribers6 August 20263 November 2026
56 measurements spanning 90 days, net -1,522. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,314–17,293 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 56
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Nov 2026, 21:0415,542-1
2 Nov 2026, 21:1015,543-3
1 Nov 2026, 23:1515,546-92
1 Nov 2026, 02:4715,638-75
31 Oct 2026, 01:0815,713-179
30 Oct 2026, 02:5615,892-284
28 Oct 2026, 23:5716,176-261
28 Oct 2026, 01:4716,437-58
27 Oct 2026, 03:1416,495-61
26 Oct 2026, 01:1716,556-81
25 Oct 2026, 00:3516,637-65
24 Oct 2026, 01:1016,702-96
23 Oct 2026, 01:4916,798+42
22 Oct 2026, 04:3116,756-20
20 Oct 2026, 22:3516,776-13
19 Oct 2026, 19:0516,789-18
18 Oct 2026, 16:5816,807-10
17 Oct 2026, 15:5516,817-8
16 Oct 2026, 13:1116,825-7
15 Oct 2026, 12:1616,832first reading

Engagement

48 posts held, back to 6 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.7%
avg views ÷ 15,542 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,780
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
8
of 48 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 October 2026
Posts held48 (6 May 2026 – 28 October 2026)
Views total38,207
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 16:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈288
Videos
≈34
Links
≈1,740

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 16s
Average length
1m 16s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 8 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

28 Oct 2026, 14:01 UTC≈5,570 viewsread 4 November 2026

В России число сим-карт сверх установленного лимита на человека сократилось в 76 раз К середине октября в перелимите оставались около 26 тысяч номеров, оформленных примерно на 1 тысячу абонентов Количество мобильных номеров, оформленных на абонентов сверх установленного лимита, с конца 2025 года к середине октября 2026 года сократилось на 1,95 млн — до 26 тыс. штук. Об этом сообщил замглавы Роскомнадзора Олег Терля…

27 Oct 2026, 14:11 UTC≈4,900 viewsread 4 November 2026

РКН ужесточит требования к операторам связи по покрытию дорог и малых поселений Телеком-компании в том числе должны будут обеспечить покрытие 90% территории поселений с населением более 1 тысячи человек С 2027 года требования к покрытию малых населенных пунктов и автомобильных дорог для операторов связи станут строже. Об этом заявил заместитель главы Роскомнадзора Олег Терляков на форуме «Спектр 2026». Его слова пр…

26 Oct 2026, 13:11 UTC≈4,920 viewsread 4 November 2026

Omnicom получила глобальный медиабизнес Lavazza на $110 млн Итальянский кофейный бренд выбрал Omnicom Media после восьмимесячного тендера Lavazza передала глобальный медиабизнес Omnicom Media. В восьмимесячном тендере, организованном консалтинговой компанией Ebiquity, также участвовала WPP — прежний подрядчик бренда. Omnicom Media будет отвечать за работу в Европе, на Ближнем Востоке и в Африке, Северной Америке и…

23 Oct 2026, 12:01 UTC≈5,670 viewsread 4 November 2026

Поступления в бюджет от налогового контроля ФНС выросли в 4,4 раза за полугодие Число выездных проверок российских компаний увеличилось на 83% Поступления в бюджетную систему России по результатам контрольно-аналитической работы Федеральной налоговой службы (ФНС) за первое полугодие 2026 года выросли в 4,4 раза год к году — до 91 млрд руб. Об этом сообщают «Известия» со ссылкой на данные ведомства. За январь — июн…

22 Oct 2026, 11:35 UTC447 viewsread 4 November 2026

Две трети медиакомпаний ждут роста выручки по итогам года 65% крупнейших российских медиакомпаний по итогам 2026 года ожидают роста выручки. У 27% она останется на уровне 2025 года, у 8% упадет. Свою прибыльность по итогам года прогнозируют 92%, убыток — 8%. Таковы данные исследования «Ведомостей». Отчет есть в распоряжении Sostav. У 63,9% медиакомпаний выручка за первое полугодие 2026 года выросла относительно янв…

15 Oct 2026, 14:31 UTC≈5,680 viewsread 4 November 2026
Photo

В Telegram будет лента рекомендаций с новостями из разных каналов. В бете для macOS нашли отдельную вкладку «Новости» с двумя разделами. В «Добавленных» можно самостоятельно собирать ленту из нужных каналов, а в «Для вас» — получать рекомендации по интересам. В ленте также предусмотрены поиск и обновление свайпом вниз. Из неё можно будет сразу перейти к посту, каналу или чату. Пока неизвестно, как именно будут форм…

14 Oct 2026, 19:23 UTC≈5,490 viewsread 4 November 2026
Video

Пока все с интересом ждут анонсов Apple о технологиях управления умным домом, START напоминает: искусственный интеллект способен на гораздо большее. Например, взять под контроль не просто дом, а целый город! Знакомьтесь — «ИИнга», Искусственный Интеллект Новоправдинской Городской Администрации. И уже этой осенью она появится на START.

14 Oct 2026, 11:16 UTC≈5,530 viewsread 4 November 2026

За два года молодые россияне стали звонить на 72% больше За два последних года объем мобильного интернет-трафика у россиян 18−24 лет сократился на 55%, а продолжительность звонков выросла на 72%. Таковы данные платформы управления связью «Экомобайл». Средний объем интернет-трафика за два года у молодых россиян снизился с 91 гигабайт (ГБ) в месяц в 2024 году до 52 ГБ в 2025-м и 41 ГБ в 2026-м. Средняя продолжительно…

25 Sept 2026, 11:01 UTC≈5,730 viewsread 4 November 2026

Три четверти россиян ждут от офлайн-жизни такой же скорости, как от онлайн-сервисов Основные требования пользователей к онлайн-сервисам — скорость, понятность и предсказуемость 88% опрошенных россиян рассказали, что жизнь с онлайн-сервисами стала проще. 58% начали быстрее выполнять ежедневные дела (покупки, оплату услуг, запись к врачу). 57% сообщили, что сервисы повысили уровень удобства и комфорта в целом. 74% жд…

24 Sept 2026, 12:01 UTC≈5,050 viewsread 4 November 2026

Розница лидирует по спросу на персонал, при этом покупатели предпочитают кассы самообслуживания КСО чаще выбирают россияне моложе 34 лет В 2026 году в России число вакансий снизилось на 19% год к году, количество резюме выросло на треть. Розничная торговля вышла на первое место по спросу на персонал. При этом растет число россиян, которые в магазинах предпочитают кассы самообслуживания традиционным кассам. Таковы д…

23 Sept 2026, 12:01 UTC206 viewsread 4 November 2026

App Store, ChatGPT и Claude собрали пятую часть зарубежных оплат россиян На три сервиса пришлось более 20% всех зарубежных покупок App Store, ChatGPT и Claude стали самыми часто оплачиваемыми зарубежными сервисами среди российских пользователей летом 2026 года. На них пришлось 9,3%, 7,2% и 5,3% всех успешных зарубежных покупок соответственно. Об этом свидетельствуют данные сервиса «Плати по всему миру», которые при…

23 Sept 2026, 12:01 UTC181 viewsread 4 November 2026

ИИ не прошел проверку на финансовую грамотность Чат-боты ошибаются в 99% случаев при сложных расчетах Чат-боты дают неправильные ответы на финансовые вопросы в среднем в 57% случаев. При сложных запросах, где требуется провести несколько расчетов или учесть одновременно несколько условий, показатель ошибок возрастает до 88%, в наиболее сложных сценариях отдельные модели ошибаются в 99% случаев. К такому выводу приш…

Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @digitalrussian. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Маркетинг / Диджитал
@marketingj · 20,799
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 September 2026
Рекламщик от Бога
@Digitalmrktng · 20,066
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 23 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Русский диджитал” (@digitalrussian), 15,542 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/digitalrussian.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.