Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Action Digital School - Школа карьерных изменений

Channel

Action Digital School - Школа карьерных изменений

@digitalschoola

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,822subscribers

-876 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001447916145
TypeChannel
Username@digitalschoola
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/digitalschoola

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9,82210,69810,2606 August 2026 — 10,698 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,691 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,649 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,630 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,606 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,585 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,545 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,535 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,525 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,488 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,463 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,442 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,432 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,420 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,408 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,389 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,357 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,339 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,310 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,291 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,229 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,191 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,156 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,132 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,090 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,049 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,018 subscribers6 September 2026 — 9,936 subscribers11 September 2026 — 9,822 subscribers6 August 202611 September 2026
29 measurements spanning 35 days, net -876. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,691–10,829 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 02:579,822-114
6 Sept 2026, 14:179,936-82
4 Sept 2026, 07:1810,018-31
2 Sept 2026, 23:3610,049-41
1 Sept 2026, 21:0610,090-42
31 Aug 2026, 21:3410,132-24
31 Aug 2026, 00:3510,156-35
29 Aug 2026, 21:0410,191-38
28 Aug 2026, 20:3410,229-62
27 Aug 2026, 18:1710,291-19
26 Aug 2026, 18:2510,310-29
25 Aug 2026, 17:5410,339-18
24 Aug 2026, 18:4810,357-32
23 Aug 2026, 06:0310,389-19
21 Aug 2026, 19:4710,408-12
20 Aug 2026, 16:0510,420-12
19 Aug 2026, 16:5310,432-10
18 Aug 2026, 16:4310,442-21
17 Aug 2026, 17:5810,463-25
16 Aug 2026, 15:2510,488first reading

Engagement

65 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.46%
avg views ÷ 9,822 subscribers
Avg views / post
143
39 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.49%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
39
of 65 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 39 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held65 (3 August 202628 August 2026)
Views total5,576
Reactions total15
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 03:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 02s
Average length
4m 02s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

36 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1644.4%
👍822.2%
🥰616.7%
25.56%
👀25.56%
🤓25.56%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 65 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 10:04 UTC86 viewsread 29 August 2026

Неудачник с дипломом или успешный мастер? Как много зарабатывать на рабочей профессии Эксперты в шоке! Рынок труда изменился на 180 градусов. Пока одни специалисты держатся за «престижный» офис с окладом, другие на ручном труде выходят на 150-250 тысяч в месяц. Сегодня деньги платят не за диплом, а за реальные востребованные навыки. Разберемся, как превратить «умение для себя» в стабильный доход. 👉 Как зарабатывать

27 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC111 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🔔 А вы готовы снова в школу? Только теперь — по собственному желанию Ждем всех взрослых, которые хотят хотя бы на пять дней снова почувствовать школьный вайб. Но в этот раз только польза, без домашки, двоек и вызовов к директору 🩷 С 7 по 11 сентября в Action Digital School пройдет «Цифровая линейка 2026» — пять бесплатных онлайн-уроков о нейросетях, цифровых навыках, 1С, психологии и нутрициологии. Каждый день в 10

27 Aug 2026, 11:04 UTC115 views2 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

Сможете отгадать? Гудит и урчит, ни зимой ни летом не спит, свет ест — а весь дом кормит. Что это? 🤔 Ответ пишите в комментариях. А заодно попробуйте угадать: ремонт какой бытовой техники сегодня приносит мастеру самый высокий чек? Ответ: холодильник — и он же самый прибыльный в ремонте, чек до 10 000 ₽ за заказ. Спрос на мастеров только растет: за 2025 год обращений за ремонтом бытовой техники стало на 21% больше

👀2

26 Aug 2026, 09:55 UTC138 views2 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Давайте проверим, сможет ли ваш мужчина потенциально зарабатывать на ремонте бытовой техники Если ваш муж, брат, отец, свекр или взрослый сын умеет работать руками, разбирается в инструментах и привык самостоятельно чинить все, что ломается дома, возможно, у него уже есть хорошая база для новой профессии, которая будет гарантированно приносить вашей семье высокий доход. Давайте это проверим? В чек-листе 15 утвержде

🔥2

25 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC142 viewsread 29 August 2026

Вебинар с Антоном Логуновым стартовал 🔥 Присоединяйтесь сейчас, чтобы узнать, как использовать уже имеющиеся знания о здоровье человека, освоить новое перспективное направление — нутрициологию, и постепенно превратить его в дополнительный источник дохода. Ждем вас по ссылке 👈

25 Aug 2026, 13:04 UTC119 viewsread 29 August 2026

Вебинар «Специалист по рациональному питанию и нутрициологии: как превратить интерес к ЗОЖ в стабильный доход» стартует через час Присоединяйтесь и узнавайте, как развиваться в нутрициологии в 2026–2027 годах, и как использовать медицинские знания и интерес к ЗОЖ для дополнительного заработка. Приходите, будет полезно! Не успели зарегистрироваться? Вот ссылка 👈

25 Aug 2026, 11:58 UTC128 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Вам это ничего не напоминает? Представьте, муж годами работает за маленькую зарплату, а настоящий свой талант использует бесплатно: вечерами чинит технику дома и помогает соседям. Знакомо? Герои нашей истории смогли превратить это хобби в профессию и увеличить доход семьи. Как? Рассказали в карточках 👆 А если ваш муж тоже может починить что угодно, возможно, стоит просто показать ему курс «Мастер по ремонту бытовой

24 Aug 2026, 16:13 UTC167 viewsread 29 August 2026

Специалист по рациональному питанию и нутрициологии: как превратить интерес к ЗОЖ в стабильный доход Вы узнаете об этом уже завтра, в 17:00 по мск на онлайн-встрече с Антоном Логуновым, практикующим нутрициологом, врачом, специалистом по клинической лабораторной диагностике и медицинской микробиологии, автором образовательных программ для специалистов здравоохранения, преподавателем курса «Специалист по рациональном

24 Aug 2026, 13:03 UTC155 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Не секрет, что именно женщина первой замечает, что мужчину больше не радует его профессия. Он еще ничего не сказал, а она уже видит: должность не меняется годами, зарплата тоже, и по вечерам он все чаще сидит в телефоне. Но это легко изменить, если взять инициативу в свои руки. Не верите? У нас учились двое таких мужчин, и обоих к смене карьеры подтолкнули жены. История 1. Сергей семь лет работал менеджером за 65 ты

🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 65 posts we hold for @digitalschoola. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 12 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

24 Aug 2026, 12:12 UTCAnonymous Poll6 voters

Если бы ваш мужчина захотел освоить новую профессию, чтобы больше зарабатывать, но при этом ему пришлось бы работать руками, как бы вы отреагировали?

  1. Поддержала, но переживала бы за деньги17%
  2. Сначала уговаривала бы хорошенько подумать0%
  3. Я сама ему это не раз предлагала17%

Shares as published, totalling 34%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

21 Aug 2026, 07:59 UTCAnonymous Poll13 voters

Что вы делаете, когда сайт или приложение зависает?

  1. Спокойно жду когда все заработает54%
  2. Обновляю страницу 10 раз подряд31%
  3. Закрываю и дико злюсь0%
  4. Иду проверять, может это я что-то делаю не так38%

The shares total 123%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

19 Aug 2026, 07:24 UTCAnonymous Quiz14 voters

Обязательно иметь высшее техническое образование и красный диплом по математике. Это нужно тестировщику?

  1. Да0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Aug 2026, 07:24 UTCAnonymous Quiz14 voters

Чинить найденные ошибки самому, прямо в коде программы. Это работа тестировщика?

  1. Да21%
  2. Нет79%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Aug 2026, 07:24 UTCAnonymous Quiz13 voters

Придумывать, как сломать программу: а что если ввести 1000 символов? А эмодзи вместо имени? А нажать кнопку 10 раз подряд? Это работа тестировщика?

  1. Да85%
  2. Нет15%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Aug 2026, 07:24 UTCAnonymous Quiz13 voters

Найти ошибку в приложении и понятно описать: где, что нажал, что пошло не так. Это работа тестировщика?

  1. Да92%
  2. Нет8%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Магия Excel
@lemur_excel · 49,874
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 25 August 2026
Журнал "Главбух"
@eglavbukru · 83,281
Telegram ranks this channel #96 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Action Digital School - Школа карьерных изменений” (@digitalschoola), 9,822 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/digitalschoola.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.