Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for dimarik❤️👑

Channel

dimarik❤️👑

@dimariksssss

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

255subscribers

+29 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002304529083
TypeChannel
Username@dimariksssss
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/dimariksssss

Growth

226255240.511 August 2026 — 226 subscribers11 August 2026 — 226 subscribers19 August 2026 — 241 subscribers26 August 2026 — 242 subscribers4 September 2026 — 245 subscribers12 September 2026 — 255 subscribers11 August 202612 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 31 days, net +29. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 222–259 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 00:41255+10
4 Sept 2026, 07:55245+3
26 Aug 2026, 23:12242+1
19 Aug 2026, 19:34241+15
11 Aug 2026, 18:30226no change
11 Aug 2026, 18:17226first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 11 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

38 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2052.6%
custom 5269356648018764198923.7%
💘410.5%
custom 522016654649145963937.89%
custom 541558998941094791625.26%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 10:21 UTC92 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Шел 7 день как я пытаюсь выбить последнюю наносилу 😱

2

1 Aug 2026, 12:14 UTC118 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Если вам когда то будут делать чистку лица, знайте это адски больно

1

1 Aug 2026, 04:00 UTC120 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Онет, август 🍁🍂..

custom 52201665464914596393💘1

31 Jul 2026, 12:49 UTC134 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

💘2custom 52693566480187641981

23 Jul 2026, 09:29 UTC208 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

1

Signed draw?⁹⁷🏒

21 Jul 2026, 13:13 UTC197 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 52693566480187641983

21 Jul 2026, 11:38 UTC186 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Ещё пару фоток есть

custom 52693566480187641983custom 54155899894109479161

21 Jul 2026, 11:38 UTC163 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 52693566480187641982custom 54155899894109479161

21 Jul 2026, 04:06 UTC188 viewsread 11 August 2026

Цель выполнена, 2 отряд никого не намазал

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @dimariksssss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“dimarik❤️👑” (@dimariksssss), 255 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dimariksssss.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.