Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Димитрий Саввин... К Вашим услугам!

Channel

Димитрий Саввин... К Вашим услугам!

@dimitriy_savvin

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

2,231subscribers

+129 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001176852107
TypeChannel
Username@dimitriy_savvin
Created26 February 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/dimitriy_savvin

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,0932,2842,188.56 August 2026 — 2,102 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,102 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,098 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,093 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,095 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,281 subscribers23 August 2026 — 2,284 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,273 subscribers28 August 2026 — 2,271 subscribers31 August 2026 — 2,264 subscribers8 September 2026 — 2,246 subscribers13 September 2026 — 2,239 subscribers17 September 2026 — 2,231 subscribers2,2316 August 202617 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 42 days, net +129. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,064–2,313 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 11:562,231-8
13 Sept 2026, 01:552,239-7
8 Sept 2026, 22:362,246-18
31 Aug 2026, 08:172,264-7
28 Aug 2026, 18:462,271-2
26 Aug 2026, 05:332,273-11
23 Aug 2026, 06:552,284+3
19 Aug 2026, 16:222,281+186
16 Aug 2026, 19:142,095+2
12 Aug 2026, 21:282,093-5
9 Aug 2026, 16:022,098-4
6 Aug 2026, 06:172,102no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:512,102first reading

Engagement

30 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 30 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 52s
Average length
1m 56s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

862 reactions across 20 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯21825.3%
👍19422.5%
🔥10111.7%
🤣617.08%
🤡576.61%
❤465.34%
😢384.41%
😁313.60%
❤‍🔥293.36%
🤔232.67%
🤮161.86%
💊111.28%
🤝101.16%
👎60.696%
💩40.464%
🤯40.464%
🆒30.348%
😈30.348%
🌭20.232%
🥴20.232%
3 further kinds30.348%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,502 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 30 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dimitriy_savvin. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 30 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTC312 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В ленте опять: "Кремль, допустив единственную антивоенную партию, загнал себя в тупик", "уже проигрывает" etc. У росоппозиции уже начались успехи и победы. При этом если интерес "лидеров", ищущих себе кормушку, еще можно объяснить рационально, то восторги "активистов" - это уже по линии психологии и даже психиатрии.

💯18😁8🤣3🤡1

7 Aug 2026, 13:20 UTC333 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Всё это печально, на самом деле. И газ, и уголь - всё это проблема, и экологическая, и политическая. Единственная по-настоящему эффективная и экологичная энергетика (если с ней грамотно обращаться) - атомная. Именно АЭС могут дать нам те 30-50 лет чистой электроэнергии, за которые удастся довести до ума солнечные батареи, ветряки и т.п. Но - увы. Одна детка бурит, другая детка АЭС закрывает. И обе истеричные, и об…

👍8❤4💯4

7 Aug 2026, 08:32 UTC457 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Деятельности "The Insider" в Латвии официально прекращена решением властей. Откровенно говоря, меня удивляло, насколько откровенно и даже демонстративно они плевали на латвийские законы. Доплевались.

👍11🤡5🤯4💊2🥴2

6 Aug 2026, 19:19 UTC871 views102 reactionsread 7 August 2026

По ситуации с партией "Яблоко", по пунктам: 1) если вы призываете отдать голос на выборах за "антивоенную партию", вы тем самым признаете факт выборов; 2) если выборы - это факт, то вы тем самым признаете, что власть в РФ формируется демократически, путем прямого народного волеизъявления; 3) если власть в РФ - демократическая, то военная экспансия Кремля - желание и воля народов России. Именно это и будет вашим п…

💯59👍17🤡11🔥7❤3👎3💩1🤔1

6 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC685 views51 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Интересно, а Путин знает, что вы ему создавали большие проблемы? После декабря 2011 года у него со стороны росоппозиции проблем не было. Ну а что касается борьбы с коррупцией в оборонном комплексе - так скорее помогаете, а не мешаете.

🤣31👍14🔥5💩1

6 Aug 2026, 14:27 UTC665 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Если искать наиболее современные примеры такого смягчения, то сразу же на ум приходит Фетхуллах Гюлен - суфий, аскет, человеколюбец и пацифист. Беда лишь в том, что если без обиняков, то Гюлен был скорее кем-то вроде философа-неоплатоника с мусульманским терминологическим аппаратом, а не собственно мусульманином - по крайне мере, мусульманином в понятиях ханбалитского мазхаба.

👍20🤔5💯3🔥3❤1

6 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC711 views69 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В самой своей основе ислам - это крайне уродливая, в прямом смысле слова садистская религиозная система. Главное здесь - это идея предопределения. Одни изначально сотворены для вечных мучений, другие - для бухательно-трахательного рая ("Мы сотворили для Геенны много джиннов и людей", Сура "Ограды", 179). По сути, и люди, и ангелы - это просто заводные игрушки, которые движутся по заранее прописанному их творцом мар…

👍32💯29🤔5❤2🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 13:09 UTC634 views41 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

На картине изображены католические короли Фердинанд и Изабелла в момент деколонизации Гранады в 1492 году.

❤‍🔥29🔥11🌭1

6 Aug 2026, 12:12 UTC647 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Рубио, в нынешних условиях, был бы идеальным новым президентом США. Но, судя по всему, это уже нереально. Республиканская партия уже пережила серьёзную идеологическую, политическую и социальную трансформацию, и вряд ли этот фарш прокрутится назад.

😢11👍6💯3🔥3🤔3❤1🌭1

6 Aug 2026, 11:54 UTC659 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Что ж, нельзя отказать Бибе и Бобе в определенной логике: если испанская Сéута - это колония испанских империалистов, то Крым - это колония украинских империалистов. Само собой, что две войны в Чечне, при таких раскладах, тоже становятся империалистическими, а Дагестан, Чечня, Ингушетия - российскими колониями, но вот это Биба и Боба как-то не очень хотят обсуждать. А мораль сей басни все та же: право либо одно для…

🔥21😁11🆒3

5 Aug 2026, 19:25 UTC720 views42 reactionsread 7 August 2026

"Все империи рано или поздно распадаются..." А демократии, как известно, живут вечно. Как же всё-таки стало много говорящих голов, толкующих буквально на уровне: - Лошади кушают овёс! - И сено! - Да, мой прекрасный коллега - и сено!

🤣27💯10💩2🤮2🤡1

5 Aug 2026, 18:30 UTC719 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

О неосоветизме, для "Kauno diena". https://m.kauno.diena.lt/naujienos/pasaulis/ekonomika-ir-politika/istorikas-kai-putinas-mirs-jie-su-ir-pagaliu-nusilipdys-nauja-1768873

🔥9💊1

Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @dimitriy_savvin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Дмитрий Демушкин
@DmitriyDemushkin · 37,489
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 1 September 2026
Тени Руси
@tenirusi · 25,548
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

2 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Congress of People's Deputies (Russia, 2022) (en.wikipedia.org)
“…name="автоссылка2">{{Cite web |title=Димитрий Саввин... К Вашим услугам! |url=https://t.me/dimitriy_savvin/1628 |access-date=8 November 2022 |website=Telegram}}…”
read 13 September 2026
З'їзд народних депутатів (2022) (uk.wikipedia.org)
“…name="автоссылка2">{{Cite web|title=Димитрий Саввин... К Вашим услугам!|url=https://t.me/dimitriy_savvin/1628|accessdate=2022-11-08|website=Telegram}}{{Неавторитетне…”
read 13 September 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Димитрий Саввин... К Вашим услугам!” (@dimitriy_savvin), 2,231 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dimitriy_savvin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.