Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for KinoKiller Reviews

Channel

KinoKiller Reviews

@dimonkinokiller

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

16,739subscribers

+31 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001764688784
TypeChannel
Username@dimonkinokiller
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/dimonkinokiller

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

16,69616,73916,717.57 August 2026 — 16,708 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,711 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,707 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,705 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,703 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,705 subscribers13 August 2026 — 16,696 subscribers14 August 2026 — 16,702 subscribers16 August 2026 — 16,715 subscribers17 August 2026 — 16,720 subscribers18 August 2026 — 16,726 subscribers19 August 2026 — 16,730 subscribers20 August 2026 — 16,724 subscribers21 August 2026 — 16,726 subscribers22 August 2026 — 16,723 subscribers24 August 2026 — 16,721 subscribers25 August 2026 — 16,722 subscribers26 August 2026 — 16,720 subscribers27 August 2026 — 16,717 subscribers28 August 2026 — 16,720 subscribers29 August 2026 — 16,727 subscribers30 August 2026 — 16,726 subscribers31 August 2026 — 16,728 subscribers1 September 2026 — 16,727 subscribers2 September 2026 — 16,728 subscribers3 September 2026 — 16,726 subscribers5 September 2026 — 16,728 subscribers8 September 2026 — 16,725 subscribers11 September 2026 — 16,716 subscribers13 September 2026 — 16,721 subscribers14 September 2026 — 16,711 subscribers16 September 2026 — 16,706 subscribers18 September 2026 — 16,739 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net +31. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,690–16,745 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 20:2116,739+33
16 Sept 2026, 14:2116,706-5
14 Sept 2026, 17:1616,711-10
13 Sept 2026, 03:3716,721+5
11 Sept 2026, 08:4216,716-9
8 Sept 2026, 13:1916,725-3
5 Sept 2026, 07:4116,728+2
3 Sept 2026, 12:2216,726-2
2 Sept 2026, 05:0516,728+1
1 Sept 2026, 06:1216,727-1
31 Aug 2026, 09:3216,728+2
30 Aug 2026, 06:3616,726-1
29 Aug 2026, 08:3516,727+7
28 Aug 2026, 06:4916,720+3
27 Aug 2026, 04:1516,717-3
26 Aug 2026, 06:4616,720-2
25 Aug 2026, 07:4216,722+1
24 Aug 2026, 11:0816,721-2
22 Aug 2026, 20:3716,723-3
21 Aug 2026, 13:3916,726first reading

Engagement

52 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
36.5%
avg views ÷ 16,739 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,120
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.08%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 52 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held52 (31 July 20263 September 2026)
Views total79,500
Reactions total3,243
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 09:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 14s
Average length
34s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

10,477 reactions across 48 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4,92747.0%
🔥2,16420.7%
😁1,25412.0%
🤣8608.21%
👍5245.00%
😢2752.62%
🥰2552.43%
😱1020.974%
🤔580.554%
👏240.229%
🤬190.181%
🤩100.095%
🎉30.029%
🤯20.019%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 48 of the 52 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,477 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 48 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dimonkinokiller. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 52 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 09:10 UTC≈1,120 views93 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Советы от сэра Ридли Скотта начинающим режиссерам: «Будь гнидой. Не принимай «нет» за ответ. А если кто-то удумает так ответить - бей по роже» Ну понятно, все по классике Будь засранцем и сри на всё

67🤣16🔥10

1 Sept 2026, 14:00 UTC≈4,640 views257 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Мудилу, что подумал, мол «а давайте введем противников на реактивных ранцах» надо просто захерачить ногами…и возможно даже по голове. В целом, весь отдел разрабов, что ввели «отряд Соболь» надо пороть, как Сидорову козу. В остальном норм. К сюжету есть вопросы, ибо какая-то каша. Да и решение ввести «Зловещую Шестерку» почти в самом конце какое-то странное, хоть и оправданно сюжетом…натянуто. Типа, вот ты играешь, в

205👍33🔥9🥰8🤬1😁1

1 Sept 2026, 09:41 UTC≈4,820 views185 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Кстати, книгочеи Тут подгон на днях организовался Ухи прожужжал про автора Ника Каттера, ну дык ребята из издательства Феникс ещё оформили ништяков от этого мастера письма Просто напутствие, если кому надо (только не наглейте, я ещё купить не успел) Хм… Черт, Феникс, вы классные ребята, и книжки оформляете моё почтение) Может это?) Того?) Вась-Вась?)

137🔥37🥰10😁1

1 Sept 2026, 09:22 UTC≈4,870 views368 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Символично, что именно сегодня приснился кошмар про то, как я опоздал на пары/не написал диплом/отчислили (три уровня сна, все как по Нолану) Ну, это…школьнички и студебейкеры прохладной жизни - с Днём знаний, что ли. Чтоб без херни!

293👍35😁24😱9🔥7

31 Aug 2026, 15:46 UTC≈5,230 views114 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Нихера не понятно, красиво и очень претенциозно Трейлер новой работы Зака Снайдера «Последняя Фотография» https://youtu.be/S3I5M0HyvYo?si=uim0em-rcMhET4oZ

78🔥22🤔13🥰1

26 Aug 2026, 16:11 UTC≈9,310 views728 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026
Photo

He was a sweet transvestite From transsexual Transylvania Не хочу грубить, но он всегда будет «тот охуенно харизматичный чел из того фильма» RIP

477😢222😱21👏3🔥3🤯2

26 Aug 2026, 12:46 UTC≈7,970 views123 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Не, а кстати))) Проявите себя в креативе) Кидайте в комменты сюжет PG-13 «Основного Инстинкта» Хоть поржем)

97😁22🔥4

26 Aug 2026, 12:38 UTC≈7,680 views198 reactionsread 3 September 2026

ИДЕЯ!!! PG - 13 «ОСНОВНОЙ ИНСТИНКТ»!!! Хорошо, засушите меня и ебаните башкой об табурет…

😁17615🔥6👍1

26 Aug 2026, 12:37 UTC≈7,550 views179 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Я тут так подумал Давеча на стриме же смотрели оригинал и ремейк «Вспомнить Всё» И, пинаете сколько хотите, ремейк хорош… Ладно, пока пинаете, я продолжу Так вот, в те же годы выходил PG-13 Робокоп) А че у продюсеров не возникло идеи сделать детский «Звездный Десант»?) Ну классно же! Без кровищи, без сис, без сатиры на нацизм, без сис, без милитаризма, без сис… Ладно, хуярьте меня дальше, спизданул не подумав

😁16110🔥8

26 Aug 2026, 11:48 UTC≈6,070 views241 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Очередные мысли на которые всем похер В мире ля мюзикь, в частности жанра ню метал, столпами жанра наравне с Korn всегда были Deftones Но вот один альбом, все эти самые фанаты, буквально заплевывают Речь про Gore, или как фэны его остро называют Горе (ладно, забавно) Я не из их числа Даже больше, я считаю этот альбом одним из лучших у команды Я не знаю с чем это связано, либо он ударил в определенное время, либо я

🔥15859🥰15🤔6👍2🤬1

25 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC≈7,900 views493 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Не верьте слухам!!! Там Амазон Прайм готовят сериал по «Робокопу». Мол Дэн Стивенс играет Алекса Мёрфи. Наглая ложь! Алекса Мёрфи играет ваш покорный слуга, но по дружбе я позволил Дэну побыть моим дублером) Ох уж эти журналюги…

317😁106🤣57🔥11🥰2

25 Aug 2026, 09:59 UTC≈6,080 views187 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Немножко мыслей про игрулечки Скоро уже выйдет игра по Hellraiser, на днях даже предзаказ оформлю (на релизе постримим), но сомнения у меня прям лютые. Уже и геймплейные ролики есть. И выглядит всё это примерно так. Приходят домой с пьянки Resident Evil: Village и BioShock. Оба в говно, но желание нырнуть в пучину страсти имеется…а спустя 9 месяцев у них родился сын дебил. Имя ему Hellraiser: Revival. Это я к чему

130😁42🔥10🥰5

Showing the 12 most recent of 52 posts we hold for @dimonkinokiller. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Terl Kabot official
@TERLKABOT_official · 43,888
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 4 September 2026
ЧЁРНЫЙ КАБИНЕТ
@cabinetblack1 · 22,698
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 20 September 2026
Вестник Чака
@tele_chuck · 33,662
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 September 2026
Фаустов Лес
@faust21century · 73,696
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 August 2026
ДКино
@dkinotv · 27,253
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 21 September 2026
Балдеж с Рачезом
@raychstudio · 27,593
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 10 September 2026
Кино Огонь
@kinoogon_official · 26,908
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 September 2026
Anacondaz
@anacondaz_official · 48,116
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 13 September 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“KinoKiller Reviews” (@dimonkinokiller), 16,739 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dimonkinokiller.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.