Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Dips Academy Official

Channel

Dips Academy Official

@dipsacademyofficial

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,907subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 16 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001198508626
TypeChannel
Username@dipsacademyofficial
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded16 September 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/dipsacademyofficial

Growth

4,9014,9074,90416 September 2026 — 4,901 subscribers18 September 2026 — 4,907 subscribers16 September 202618 September 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,900–4,908 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 17:214,907+6
16 Sept 2026, 23:224,901first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.2%
avg views ÷ 4,907 subscribers
Avg views / post
843
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.094%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 September 2026
Posts held19 (2 July 2026 – 10 September 2026)
Views total3,372
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Sept 2026, 23:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

18 reactions across 10 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1688.9%
👀15.56%
👍15.56%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 10 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Sept 2026, 13:24 UTC878 views1 reactionsread 16 September 2026
Photo

🎓 𝗝𝗼𝗶𝗻𝘁 𝗖𝗦𝗜𝗥-𝗨𝗚𝗖 𝗡𝗘𝗧 𝗝𝘂𝗻𝗲 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟲 𝗥𝗲𝘀𝘂𝗹𝘁𝘀 𝗢𝘂𝘁! 📢 ✅ 𝗖𝗵𝗲𝗰𝗸 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘂𝗹𝘁 𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲: https://csirhrdg.res.in/SiteContent/ManagedContent/ATContent/Joint_CSIR_UGC_NET_Result_June_2026_20260910174438058.pdf 📚 Congratulations to all the qualifiers! Your hard work has paid off. Also, check 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝗷𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗖𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗴𝗼𝗿𝘆-𝘄𝗶𝘀𝗲 𝗰𝘂𝘁-𝗼𝗳𝗳 𝗺𝗮𝗿𝗸𝘀 ✅ https://csirhrdg.res.in/SiteContent/ManagedContent/ATContent/Joint_CSIR_UGC_NET_Cut_off_June_2026_2026

👍1

10 Sept 2026, 12:44 UTC629 viewsread 16 September 2026

👉Check Result👇 https://csirhrdg.res.in/SiteContent/ManagedContent/ATContent/Joint_CSIR_UGC_NET_Result_June_2026_20260910174438058.pdf

5 Sept 2026, 14:45 UTC≈1,240 views1 reactionsread 16 September 2026

https://youtube.com/shorts/sHWUcODdxZc?si=uYJ7vEGVg6sljGUE

❤1

12 Aug 2026, 06:14 UTC≈2,890 views1 reactionsread 16 September 2026
Photo

📚✨ 𝗠𝗣𝗣𝗦𝗖 𝗔𝘀𝘀𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗳𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗼𝗿 (𝗠𝗮𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗰𝘀) – 𝗢𝗻𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝗧𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗦𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗲𝘀 Are you ready to crack the 𝗠𝗣𝗣𝗦𝗖 𝗔𝘀𝘀𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗳𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗼𝗿 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟲 𝗘𝘅𝗮𝗺 with confidence? DIPS Academy brings a comprehensive Math 𝗢𝗻𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝗧𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗦𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗲𝘀 to help you evaluate your preparation and boost your confidence before the final exam. 📅 𝗦𝘁𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗙𝗿𝗼𝗺: 𝟭𝟰𝘁𝗵 𝗔𝘂𝗴 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟲 🌐 𝗕𝘂𝘆 𝗡𝗼𝘄: https://www.dipsacademy.com/mppsc-assistant-professor-test-series 🔍 What You’ll Get…

❤1

7 Aug 2026, 13:20 UTC≈2,550 views2 reactionsread 16 September 2026
Photo

🎯 𝗖𝗦𝗜𝗥 𝗡𝗘𝗧 𝗠𝗮𝘁𝗵𝘀 𝗗𝗲𝗰 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟲 - 𝗪𝗲𝗲𝗸𝗲𝗻𝗱 𝗖𝗹𝗮𝘀𝘀𝗿𝗼𝗼𝗺 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗺 Are you a working professional, a college student, or preparing alongside your studies? Our Weekend Classroom Program is specially designed to help you prepare for CSIR NET Math Dec 2026 without disrupting your weekday schedule. 📅 𝗕𝗮𝘁𝗰𝗵 𝗦𝘁𝗮𝗿𝘁𝘀: 𝟴𝘁𝗵 𝗔𝘂𝗴𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟲 🌐 𝙀𝙣𝙧𝙤𝙡𝙡 𝙉𝙤𝙬: https://www.dipsacademy.com/csir-net-jrf-weekend-classroom-program 𝗡𝗢𝗧𝗘: 𝗥𝗲𝗽𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗦𝘁𝘂𝗱𝗲…

❤2

4 Aug 2026, 13:19 UTC≈1,530 views1 reactionsread 16 September 2026

https://youtu.be/6JLt7jUKQR8?si=42vx076Jk2ObPrW2

❤1

23 Jul 2026, 11:41 UTC≈3,090 views3 reactionsread 16 September 2026
Photo

🎯 𝗗𝗦𝗦𝗦𝗕 𝗧𝗚𝗧 𝗠𝗮𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗰𝘀 𝗢𝗻𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝗮𝗰𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 - 𝗔𝗱𝗺𝗶𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗢𝗽𝗲𝗻! Join our specialized online coaching program for 𝗗𝗦𝗦𝗦𝗕 𝗧𝗚𝗧 𝗠𝗮𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗰𝘀 and prepare to ace your exam with expert guidance. 🌐 𝗘𝗻𝗿𝗼𝗹𝗹 𝗛𝗲𝗿𝗲: https://www.dipsacademy.com/dsssb-tgt-maths-online-coaching ✅ Eligibility: Bachelor’s Degree in Related Subject, B.Ed / B.El.Ed, CTET Exam Passed. 🔥 Highlights: 🔹 Online Classes by Renowned Faculties. 🔹 Recorded Video Le…

❤3

21 Jul 2026, 13:12 UTC≈2,890 views2 reactionsread 16 September 2026
Photo

🚀 𝗖𝗦𝗜𝗥 𝗡𝗘𝗧/𝗝𝗥𝗙 𝗠𝗮𝘁𝗵𝘀 𝗗𝗘𝗖 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟲 – 𝗕𝗮𝘁𝗰𝗵 𝟮 𝗔𝗱𝗺𝗶𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗢𝗽𝗲𝗻! Your dream of qualifying 𝗖𝗦𝗜𝗥 𝗡𝗘𝗧/𝗝𝗥𝗙 starts with the right guidance. Join our 𝗢𝗳𝗳𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲 & 𝗢𝗻𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝗕𝗮𝘁𝗰𝗵 𝟮 and learn from experienced faculty through a well-planned, concept-focused, and exam-oriented preparation program. 📅 Batch Starts: 𝟮𝟳𝘁𝗵 𝗝𝘂𝗹𝘆 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟲 📍 Jia Sarai, South Delhi ✅ 𝗥𝗲𝗴𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗡𝗼𝘄: https://forms.gle/nrVpMASHjLUPYxdX7 Have any query? ☎️ +91-999082665…

❤2

17 Jul 2026, 13:05 UTCviews —

Dips Academy Official pinned «Q. What do you think will be the difficulty level of the CSIR NET Mathematical Sciences July 2026 Exam?»

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @dipsacademyofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

17 Jul 2026, 13:05 UTCAnonymous Poll281 voters

Q. What do you think will be the difficulty level of the CSIR NET Mathematical Sciences July 2026 Exam?

  1. 1. Easy6%
  2. 2. Medium47%
  3. 3. Hard29%
  4. 4. Very Hard18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 10 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Apni University Geography
@apniuniversityofficial · 24,190
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 16 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Dips Academy Official” (@dipsacademyofficial), 4,907 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dipsacademyofficial.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.