🔹️ Травма Джафаргулиева может оказаться серьезной ⚽️🇦🇿 🔗 https://shorturl.at/fq36u

Channel
В мире футбола
@disputfutbol
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
430subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001546950793 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @disputfutbol |
| Created | 3 September 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/disputfutbol |
Topic
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 08:56 | 430 | +3 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 04:16 | 427 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:43 | 426 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 02:57 | 425 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:19 | 428 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:24 | 428 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 4s
- Average length
- 4s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
129 reactions across 16 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 61 | 47.3% | |
| ❤ | 29 | 22.5% | |
| 💯 | 12 | 9.30% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 3.88% | |
| 💔 | 5 | 3.88% | |
| 😱 | 5 | 3.88% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 3.10% | |
| 😢 | 4 | 3.10% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 2.33% | |
| 🤷♂ | 1 | 0.775% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 129 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🇺🇸 Настоящее безумие в США: Главные рекорды и трагедии ЧМ-1994 Этот турнир навсегда изменил футбол, принеся с собой коммерцию, новые правила (впервые дали 3 очка за победу) и пачку исторических рекордов. Вот 5 невероятных фактов и драм мундиаля 1994 года, которые вы могли забыть: 🏟 Вечный рекорд трибун. На американских стадионах матчи посетили 3 587 538 зрителей! Этот рекорд держится до сих пор, хотя тогда в турнир…
👍3❤2👏1
300 минут вы не можете забить гол Вы проиграли клубам, которых в прошлом сезоне вы бы на закуску погрызли Вам нечего делать в еврокубках Страшно представить, что с вами сделает «Твенте», если вы каким-то чудом найдёте в себе силы и пройдёте «Динамо» Лучше сосредоточьтесь на чемпионате Азербайджана, наиграйте свой никакущий состав и приходите в следующем году Немощные… 3й квалификационный раунд Лиги Конференций …
👍7💔2👏1
Верните нам нашу команду!!! Макрецскис справа - не Сильва Сильва в центре - не Мустафазаде Варконьи - не Медина Муаддиб - не Леандро Кащук - не Дуран Ни одна из играющих в этом матче команд не заслуживает победу. И не заслуживает выхода в группу Лиги Конференций Две унылые, скудные, никакущие команды. Возня в центре, не проходят 3-4 паса подряд, никаких ударов по воротам, никаких опасных моментов. Не тайм, а дно п…
💯7😢2❤1👍1🤷♂1
Я, конечно, всё понимаю. Травмы, новички, несыгранность, хороший соперник А футбол играть будете, «скакуны»? Хотя бы что-нибудь похожее на футбол покажете? Проигрывать можно, но проигрывать не играя - это позорно же Динамо Киев - Карабах 1:0 28 минута
❤4👍1
⚡️ Сегодня азербайджанский «Карабах» проведет первый матч 3-го раунда квалификации Лиги конференций по футболу ⚽️🇦🇿 21:00 ДИНАМО (Украина) – КАРАБАХ (Азербайджан) 🔗 https://shorturl.at/nXUwN
😍3👍2👏1
Точный счёт, увы, я написал правильно Но есть и плюс Я сильно недооценил «Сабах» и в то же время переоценил «Орхус». «Сабах» не заслужил поражения. И даже ничью не заслужил. Два дальних удара и два гола у датчан. Им очень повезло. Это всё, что показал «Орхус». А «Сабах» и сравнял, с миллиметровым офсайдом и все штанги/перекладины пересчитал и владел мячом больше и был острее Если сыграют так же в Баку, то соверше…
👍17❤3
Отмена… Офсайд у Сольве Жаль Орхус - Сабах 2:1
ЗАТАЩИЛИ! Вместе с мячом, вратарем и защитником Сольве поражает датские ворота Курьезный гол, но кому какое дело? Красавцы! 2:2
👍6
Ах как же повезло датчанам. Ракета от Умаралиева и вратарь уже просто смотрел на мяч, который предательски попал в перекладину, а не в ворота
❤6👍4
Гооооол! Велько Шимич отыгрывает один гол
❤8
Да уж… 2:0 Если «Сабах» не забьёт один, то в ответке будет супер тяжело
💯3❤1👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @disputfutbol. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@maidentower · 33,962
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 3 September 2026
@Azerbaijan_MOD · 22,637
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“В мире футбола” (@disputfutbol), 430 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/disputfutbol.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.