Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 413: Пропаганда📝

Channel

413: Пропаганда📝

@diss_413

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,512subscribers

-32 since we began measuring on 23 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002108149783
TypeChannel
Username@diss_413
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded23 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/diss_413

Growth

3,5123,5443,52823 August 2026 — 3,544 subscribers24 August 2026 — 3,535 subscribers26 August 2026 — 3,540 subscribers30 August 2026 — 3,530 subscribers2 September 2026 — 3,524 subscribers6 September 2026 — 3,512 subscribers23 August 20266 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 14 days, net -32. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,507–3,549 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 01:383,512-12
2 Sept 2026, 02:283,524-6
30 Aug 2026, 01:343,530-10
26 Aug 2026, 18:343,540+5
24 Aug 2026, 00:433,535-9
23 Aug 2026, 04:453,544first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 31 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.9%
avg views ÷ 3,512 subscribers
Avg views / post
417
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026
Posts held20 (31 March 202620 August 2026)
Views total834
Reactions total96
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Aug 2026, 04:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
16s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,240 reactions across 20 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 533732593999702855467820.9%
custom 531245030116741384038511.9%
custom 532776177797327213137811.7%
35310.9%
❤‍🔥34010.5%
custom 52828025284701919001925.93%
💘1775.46%
custom 53395320886033283501614.97%
🍓1304.01%
😢932.87%
🔥802.47%
🦄652.01%
🖕320.988%
💊310.957%
💋280.864%
🕊280.864%
custom 5339398944617153685180.556%
👍180.556%
😭120.37%
🙏100.309%
8 further kinds310.957%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,240 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 March 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @diss_413. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 March 2026 to 20 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 15:40 UTC316 views36 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Forwarded from @scarlettsgorVideo

🦀ГЛАВА ВЫШЛА🦀ЧАСТЬ: 1/3 🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸 Полтора года ожиданий стоят того, чтобы наконец окунуться в историю с головой. Начало второй главы уже доступно Вторая и третья часть будут доступны позже. Когда - сообщим совсем скоро ➡️СКАЧАТЬ ВТОРУЮ ГЛАВУ⬅️ ➡️Любые скрины и теории прячьте под спойлер - пусть они останутся тайной для тех, кто ещё не ступил на эту тропу. Впечатлениями и багами делитесь не здесь: для этого есть о

🍓23💘54custom 53124503011674138403👎1

20 Aug 2026, 15:40 UTC518 views60 reactionsread 23 August 2026

Меня выпустили из рабства и великий тсгор сделан Пройдите пж мы очень старались Уже продолжаю работу с 413, жить будем.

🍓38custom 531245030116741384011custom 533953208860332835073💘1

4 Aug 2026, 21:11 UTC≈1,490 views182 reactionsread 23 August 2026

Кто волнуется - не волнуйтесь, мы живы, в ближайшие пару дней закончу с другим проектом и доделаю 2.1

custom 5339532088603328350103custom 531245030116741384035💘17🍓10custom 533732593999702855475❤‍🔥1👨‍💻1

16 Jul 2026, 19:48 UTCviews —136 reactionsread 23 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 533732593999702855475🖕32🦄9custom 528280252847019190054👎4custom 53395320886033283504custom 53124503011674138403

26 Jun 2026, 23:33 UTC≈3,700 views130 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

Важная информация для тех, кто держит фулл пропуск вот так включенным Пожалуйста, включайте его только для скипа и выключайте, когда доскипали до нужного момента, иначе эта настройка ломает все with в играх на renpy (почти всех новеллах, крч) исчезает плавность и многие эффекты. Благодарю за внимание

custom 533732593999702855482custom 528280252847019190015👍12🍓75custom 53395320886033283505custom 53124503011674138402💊1

24 Jun 2026, 13:08 UTC≈3,550 views198 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

Доказываю, что не филоню p.s. что за зеленые хрени везде не спрашивайте, просто скрин очень странно зашакалило

custom 531245030116741384011634🔥18💘11💊4🥰4custom 53373259399970285544custom 52828025284701919003

13 Jun 2026, 10:10 UTC≈4,100 views178 reactionsread 23 August 2026

Если кто думает, что мы умерли, опровергаю это. Я работал над продолжением другого проекта. Кто знает какого, тот знает, у нас много общей фанбазы Сегодня продолжаю делать 413. Как кодер я ожил, возрадуйтесь, 2.1 не за горами

custom 5282802528470191900114custom 531245030116741384024custom 53395320886033283501511🍓4custom 53373259399970285543👏2🔥2

18 May 2026, 22:06 UTC≈4,430 views199 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

#фанфакт413 8 Любимое аниме Ичи - "Добро пожаловать в ад, Ирума" Мицу - "Бездомный Бог" Ши - "Последний серафим"

❤‍🔥12828🍓19💘10custom 53277617779732721314👎3🕊3👀1

5 May 2026, 02:36 UTC≈4,670 views222 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

Давно скринов не было Ультую скрином с напоминанием о коллабе

custom 532776177797327213113745custom 533732593999702855423❤‍🔥6💘3🍓2🔥2🤯2

3 May 2026, 15:02 UTC≈4,270 views88 reactionsread 23 August 2026

Нагло сворую идею на движ у УКОЛа Какие у вас есть теории или хэды? Хотелось бы ознакомиться

62🍓8💊8🕊5custom 53277617779732721312❤‍🔥1🔥1custom 53373259399970285541

3 May 2026, 00:18 UTC≈4,140 views148 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

Оно способно на рефлексию * это вырезка рассуждений гг об отношениях, если кто-то не понял

custom 533732593999702855490custom 532776177797327213118custom 5339532088603328350168🍓4❤‍🔥3🔥3🙏3

29 Apr 2026, 17:43 UTC≈3,340 views181 reactionsread 23 August 2026

Официально разрешаю делать мерч кому угодно без нашей доли (забирайте все монеты крч) Ток уведомьте, чтобы прорекламил хоть Разбирайте кому надо, мне в падлу самому заниматься мерчом

❤‍🔥102custom 532776177797327213132custom 533732593999702855421custom 528280252847019190085🍓4💊3👀2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @diss_413. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Apr 2026, 14:37 UTCAnonymous Poll573 voters

Начали хайповать плейлисты персов (видел у мбд и натк, чтоб не сказали, что все украл и не сказал) стоит ли сделать тоже или мы антихайп?

  1. Делай59%
  2. Антихайп, не надо8%
  3. Называй меня Дазай💋34%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 March 2026 to 20 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Визуальные новеллы для Android | VienDesu! Porting Team
@visual_novels_for_android · 57,750
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“413: Пропаганда📝” (@diss_413), 3,512 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/diss_413.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.