Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for moonlit avenue ✷

Channel

moonlit avenue ✷

@distinguinx

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

116subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 27 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002473883403
TypeChannel
Username@distinguinx
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded27 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/distinguinx

Growth

11627 Aug 2026, 01:48 — 116 subscribers27 Aug 2026, 20:03 — 116 subscribers27 Aug 2026, 01:4827 Aug 2026, 20:03
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 115–117 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 20:03116no change
27 Aug 2026, 01:48116first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 21 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
16s
Average length
8s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

77 reactions across 5 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 51952043511859353301114.3%
custom 52986650152203924621114.3%
custom 53012283977315289881013.0%
custom 62983737577947829921013.0%
custom 5195338706352885988810.4%
custom 6298708739474067488810.4%
custom 524695656820901478979.09%
custom 518826096961626496467.79%
custom 520219701750532430067.79%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 77reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 21 April 2025 to 17 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 10 we hold a reading for · 30%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @distinguinx. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 April 2025 to 17 February 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Feb 2026, 14:39 UTC157 viewsread 27 August 2026
Forwarded from @SPLASHNEWSRPPhoto

#HotSplash Amory, Chloe, Rachel, Zara, and Sine, five souls, one table, endless laughter. Soft lights, clinking glasses, shared plates, and stories that spill between bites. Good food tastes better when it’s paired with good company, and nights like this feel quietly magical the kind you wish you could fold into your pocket and keep forever. Dinner at Cipriani Monte Carlo, where elegance meets comfort, and every bit

4 Feb 2026, 10:53 UTC129 views8 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 52469565682090147894custom 52021970175053243002custom 52986650152203924622

1 Feb 2026, 12:22 UTC128 views13 reactionsread 27 August 2026

⋆✴︎˚。⋆ je prends mon temps, laissant le monde avancer pendant que je reste là. time passes differently here in costa rica. nothing feels like it’s waiting to interrupt the day. i wake up when the light comes in, not because i planned to, but because the day already started without me. most hours are spent outside, moving from shade to sun, from water to land, doing very little and thinking even less. the ocean stays

custom 52986650152203924625custom 53012283977315289885custom 52469565682090147893

1 Feb 2026, 12:22 UTC88 views13 reactions2 Starsread 27 August 2026
Photo

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ

custom 53012283977315289885custom 52021970175053243004custom 52986650152203924624

23 Jan 2026, 16:11 UTC167 views18 reactions3 Starsread 27 August 2026
Video

‎ ❦ she was a sky full of stars, some might have thought more of a constellation than human. not meant to be understood all at once, but traced slowly, point by point, until wonder settles in the chest. the most beauteous and tangled web of light ever gathered in one place, as if the universe had grown careless and let its secrets spill into her being. she was fresh bloom after long winters. white linen sheets warmed

custom 629837375779478299210custom 62987087394740674888

21 Apr 2025, 11:11 UTC≈2,290 views25 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 519520435118593533011custom 51953387063528859888custom 51882609696162649646

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @distinguinx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 858,878 of 1,623,166entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“moonlit avenue ✷” (@distinguinx), 116 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/distinguinx.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.