Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ditto Nation

Channel

Ditto Nation

@ditto_nation

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,790subscribers

-73 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001824752415
TypeChannel
Username@ditto_nation
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ditto_nation

Growth

7,7907,8637,826.57 August 2026 — 7,863 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,860 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,854 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,842 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,833 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,825 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,821 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,811 subscribers28 August 2026 — 7,804 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,800 subscribers5 September 2026 — 7,790 subscribers7 August 20265 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 29 days, net -73. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,779–7,874 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 08:597,790-10
1 Sept 2026, 04:027,800-4
28 Aug 2026, 19:227,804-7
25 Aug 2026, 20:047,811-10
23 Aug 2026, 01:357,821-4
19 Aug 2026, 19:217,825-8
16 Aug 2026, 17:437,833-9
13 Aug 2026, 00:557,842-12
10 Aug 2026, 08:117,854-6
7 Aug 2026, 17:417,860-3
7 Aug 2026, 15:457,863first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 6 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.9%
avg views ÷ 7,790 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,000
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.10%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026
Posts held18 (6 June 202621 August 2026)
Views total3,012
Reactions total33
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 20:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
12m 33s
Average length
1m 08s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

511 reactions across 17 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12023.5%
🤣8115.9%
🦄6713.1%
💔519.98%
😐336.46%
👎254.89%
💯234.50%
🤯203.91%
💘112.15%
❤‍🔥91.76%
🆒81.57%
🌚81.57%
🫡81.57%
😱71.37%
😈61.17%
🔥50.978%
🤪50.978%
👻40.783%
😢40.783%
🤔40.783%
7 further kinds122.35%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 511 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 6 June 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Aug 2026, 20:56 UTC≈1,070 views31 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

🇺🇸 Hundreds of women in pink, at a courthouse in Massachusetts, supporting Lindsay Clancy who is on trial for the strangulation of her three young children. Her defence is claiming postpartum psychosis as a mitigating factor. She was prescribed a large number of SSRIs and other meds prior to the killings.

😐11🦄10🤣54🤯1

21 Aug 2026, 20:53 UTC966 views0 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

🇳🇬 And another one: “A failed assault by IS militants on a Nigeria army unit was repelled during the attack, with the assault resulting in heavy losses among the attackers and the destruction of several enemy positions and equipment. “The unit successfully held its ground and prevented the militants from achieving their objective.” I have no idea why some of the militants are naked/stripped, but I’ve asked him for

21 Aug 2026, 19:58 UTC976 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

🇳🇬 sent to me by @operator_ngr “Intense clashes are visible in footage from the Timbuktu Triangle, Borno State, as ISWAP terrorists provide cover for a suicide vehicle-borne improvised explosive device (SVBIED) to approach a temporary army camp, prior to the SVBIED attack.”

2

24 Jul 2026, 18:08 UTC≈2,460 views23 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

🇺🇸 anime hype reel with weird gay subplot for the new Anduril Thunder attack drone

🤯117🤣5

12 Jul 2026, 17:12 UTC≈3,420 views44 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

🇷🇺 Russian air defense team “training” with a YakB-12.7 machine gun, primary weapon of the USPU-24 gun mount used on the Mi-24 “Hind” attack helicopter, that exerts 1.4 tons of recoil force

🤣36🤯4😱2🆒2

12 Jul 2026, 17:10 UTC≈2,820 views20 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

🇺🇸 US drone strike on Iran playing on a giant screen in the Golden Unicorn restaurant in Chinatown, New York City c. July 2026 (via Durangoism)

12🤣5👻2🤔1

3 Jul 2026, 15:39 UTC≈3,150 views25 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

🫪 We made yet another magazine for you! https://www.vice.com/en/self-destruction-issue-2026/

💘118😐4🔥1🦄1

1 Jul 2026, 17:34 UTC≈3,000 views33 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

🫪 Someone made this which is amazing and a bit scary (thanks libraryofmagazines)

11🆒6🤪4😐4❤‍🔥3🦄3👻2

1 Jul 2026, 08:17 UTC≈2,560 views42 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

🇮🇱 Israelis celebrating International Yoga Day by doing yoga to heal PTSD from the “war” and the international reaction to it

🦄16🤣10😐6🕊3🤗3👎2😈1🙏1

28 Jun 2026, 20:51 UTC≈2,740 views78 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

🏳️‍🌈 happy pride millennium to all the homosexualists in the channel

🦄37🤣13👎10😐64🤯4😈2🤪1

28 Jun 2026, 13:58 UTC≈2,620 views38 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

🇲🇽“The Batman of Jalisco”. A vigilante has been taping alleged motorbike thieves to lampposts with the word “rat” (and others) written on their foreheads, and what appear to be whiskers on their faces 🐭

💯2311👌1🔥1🤨1😍1

25 Jun 2026, 19:11 UTC≈2,780 views77 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Someone snitched on my other channel (private). I’ve had it for 7 years, so pretty devastating. I have appealed, hopefully it will come back

💔5121😢4😈1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ditto_nation. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

POPULAR FRONT
@POPULARXFRONT · 31,317
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 6 September 2026
The Observers
@contlictobservers · 45,883
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 27 August 2026
Our Wars, Today
@ourwarstoday · 47,327
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ditto Nation” (@ditto_nation), 7,790 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ditto_nation.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.