Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 【地推宝】🫵 @𝘿𝙞𝙏𝙪𝙞𝘽𝙖𝙤

Supergroup

【地推宝】🫵 @𝘿𝙞𝙏𝙪𝙞𝘽𝙖𝙤

@dituibao

Has discussion group3 usernames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry

9,849members

+237 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

307 online right now

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002805846446
TypeSupergroup
Usernames@dituibao @dtbbbb @XiangMuBao
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded23 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/dituibao

Growth

9,6129,8559,733.57 August 2026 — 9,612 members7 August 2026 — 9,612 members8 August 2026 — 9,648 members8 August 2026 — 9,647 members10 August 2026 — 9,664 members11 August 2026 — 9,680 members13 August 2026 — 9,715 members14 August 2026 — 9,740 members17 August 2026 — 9,718 members18 August 2026 — 9,728 members20 August 2026 — 9,723 members23 August 2026 — 9,728 members24 August 2026 — 9,723 members24 August 2026 — 9,725 members24 August 2026 — 9,722 members27 August 2026 — 9,773 members27 August 2026 — 9,770 members28 August 2026 — 9,779 members30 August 2026 — 9,789 members31 August 2026 — 9,792 members31 August 2026 — 9,775 members2 September 2026 — 9,803 members3 September 2026 — 9,778 members3 September 2026 — 9,778 members7 September 2026 — 9,834 members8 September 2026 — 9,855 members9 September 2026 — 9,849 members9,8497 August 20269 September 2026
27 measurements spanning 32 days, net +237. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,576–9,891 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every members count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)MembersChange
9 Sept 2026, 00:399,849-6
8 Sept 2026, 09:599,855+21
7 Sept 2026, 09:399,834+56
3 Sept 2026, 10:049,778no change
3 Sept 2026, 09:269,778-25
2 Sept 2026, 07:079,803+28
31 Aug 2026, 06:449,775-17
31 Aug 2026, 02:129,792+3
30 Aug 2026, 03:329,789+10
28 Aug 2026, 06:349,779+9
27 Aug 2026, 19:139,770-3
27 Aug 2026, 09:269,773+51
24 Aug 2026, 21:579,722-3
24 Aug 2026, 19:359,725+2
24 Aug 2026, 04:389,723-5
23 Aug 2026, 11:059,728+5
20 Aug 2026, 18:239,723-5
18 Aug 2026, 00:529,728+10
17 Aug 2026, 11:059,718-22
14 Aug 2026, 19:169,740first reading

Engagement

No public post preview. We read this entry on 23 August 2026 and Telegram serves no public post stream for it — the channel has previews switched off, or it is a group or bot with no readable feed. Views, reactions and engagement rates cannot be measured from the outside for an entry in this state, so we publish none. Subscriber counts above are unaffected.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“【地推宝】🫵 @𝘿𝙞𝙏𝙪𝙞𝘽𝙖𝙤” (@dituibao), 9,849 members as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dituibao.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.