Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Zhina’s diaries

Channel

Zhina’s diaries

@divaadiariess

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

10,264subscribers

+1,076 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003465822139
TypeChannel
Username@divaadiariess
Description@ZhinaUnknown_bot 🧚🏻‍♀️ Instagram ~ Zhinamousaavi
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held40
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/divaadiariess

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

9,18810,3209,7549 August 2026 — 9,188 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,224 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,237 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,371 subscribers19 August 2026 — 9,432 subscribers22 August 2026 — 9,445 subscribers25 August 2026 — 9,449 subscribers28 August 2026 — 9,470 subscribers31 August 2026 — 9,777 subscribers4 September 2026 — 9,921 subscribers9 September 2026 — 9,953 subscribers13 September 2026 — 10,008 subscribers14 September 2026 — 10,036 subscribers16 September 2026 — 10,062 subscribers19 September 2026 — 10,060 subscribers26 September 2026 — 10,320 subscribers4 October 2026 — 10,313 subscribers8 October 2026 — 10,290 subscribers13 October 2026 — 10,240 subscribers14 October 2026 — 10,242 subscribers15 October 2026 — 10,257 subscribers16 October 2026 — 10,236 subscribers17 October 2026 — 10,212 subscribers18 October 2026 — 10,205 subscribers19 October 2026 — 10,191 subscribers20 October 2026 — 10,181 subscribers22 October 2026 — 10,176 subscribers23 October 2026 — 10,155 subscribers24 October 2026 — 10,144 subscribers25 October 2026 — 10,140 subscribers26 October 2026 — 10,137 subscribers27 October 2026 — 10,130 subscribers28 October 2026 — 10,122 subscribers29 October 2026 — 10,116 subscribers30 October 2026 — 10,121 subscribers31 October 2026 — 10,276 subscribers1 November 2026 — 10,292 subscribers2 November 2026 — 10,293 subscribers4 November 2026 — 10,281 subscribers5 November 2026 — 10,264 subscribers10,2649 August 20265 November 2026
40 measurements spanning 88 days, net +1,076. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,018–10,490 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 40
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 02:4110,264-17
4 Nov 2026, 02:4910,281-12
2 Nov 2026, 23:4010,293+1
1 Nov 2026, 20:4610,292+16
31 Oct 2026, 17:4610,276+155
30 Oct 2026, 15:0110,121+5
29 Oct 2026, 12:0410,116-6
28 Oct 2026, 08:4510,122-8
27 Oct 2026, 05:1710,130-7
26 Oct 2026, 04:2910,137-3
25 Oct 2026, 07:1910,140-4
24 Oct 2026, 06:5110,144-11
23 Oct 2026, 08:0510,155-21
22 Oct 2026, 08:1010,176-5
20 Oct 2026, 23:2010,181-10
19 Oct 2026, 21:5810,191-14
18 Oct 2026, 22:1510,205-7
17 Oct 2026, 21:2110,212-24
16 Oct 2026, 23:1110,236-21
15 Oct 2026, 19:5010,257first reading

Engagement

272 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.1%
avg views ÷ 10,264 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,270
71 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.36%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
71
of 272 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 69 of 71 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held272 (8 August 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total160,862
Reactions total2,150
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 20:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
880
Videos
70
Links
227

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
10s
Average length
5s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

14,062 reactions across 266 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤4,71733.5%
💋2,66018.9%
👍2,62718.7%
💘1,86113.2%
🥰1,42510.1%
💅7065.02%
😁660.469%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 267 of the 272 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14,062 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 272 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 71 posts held from the last 30 days (4.23%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 20:35 UTC514 views17 reactionsread 5 November 2026

و دقیقا همونطوری سوال دادن

😁15❤2

Signed Zhina

5 Nov 2026, 20:35 UTC514 views9 reactionsread 5 November 2026

و تقریبا مطمئن بودم که اونطوری سوال نمیدن چون اگر اینطوری سوال بدن هیچکس قبول نمیشه

😁9

Signed Zhina

5 Nov 2026, 20:34 UTC544 views5 reactionsread 5 November 2026

یعنی اگر بخوان اذیت کنن چجوری سوال میدن

❤5

Signed Zhina

5 Nov 2026, 20:34 UTC544 views4 reactionsread 5 November 2026

از هر بخش تئوری رفتم سختترین قسمت هارو سعی کردم ببینم چجوری میتونن سوال بدن

❤4

Signed Zhina

5 Nov 2026, 20:33 UTC575 viewsread 5 November 2026

https://t.me/divaadiariess/14460 شبیهشون سوال اومد؟

Signed Zhina

5 Nov 2026, 20:31 UTC665 views14 reactionsread 5 November 2026

از دید معلم داشتم سعی میکردم سوالاتی رو از خودم بپرسم که میدونم قراره توی اون سوال ها گیر کنم

❤12💅2

Signed Zhina

5 Nov 2026, 20:30 UTC665 views17 reactionsread 5 November 2026

اینجا سوالات امتحانی رو داشتم پیش بینی میکردم

❤13💅4

Signed Zhina

5 Nov 2026, 20:29 UTC725 views18 reactionsread 5 November 2026

خیلی براشون زحمت کشیدم

❤18

Signed Zhina

5 Nov 2026, 20:29 UTC725 views17 reactionsread 5 November 2026

دلم نمیاد بندازمشون دور

❤17

Signed Zhina

Showing the 12 most recent of 272 posts we hold for @divaadiariess. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 8 posts on @divaadiariess as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
9 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
24 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
28 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Zhina’s diaries” (@divaadiariess), 10,264 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/divaadiariess.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.