Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Джун Техобзоры

Channel

Джун Техобзоры

@djun1

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

47,959subscribers

+2,641 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002058882666
TypeChannel
Username@djun1
DescriptionYoutube канал Джун | youtube.com/@djunn/ Чат канала, обсуждения, вопросы: t.me/djun_chat (если вы не войдете в чат, не будете видеть ответы в которых не процитировали ваш вопрос)
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held63
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/djun1

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

45,31847,95946,638.57 August 20268 November 2026
63 measurements spanning 93 days, net +2,641. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 44,922–48,355 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 07:2147,959+34
7 Nov 2026, 05:1047,925+9
6 Nov 2026, 01:5647,916+20
5 Nov 2026, 04:2747,896+7
4 Nov 2026, 05:1147,889+20
3 Nov 2026, 03:4647,869+8
2 Nov 2026, 06:3947,861+38
1 Nov 2026, 03:0747,823+17
31 Oct 2026, 05:2847,806+11
30 Oct 2026, 08:5547,795+26
29 Oct 2026, 11:4847,769+16
28 Oct 2026, 08:4447,753+9
27 Oct 2026, 08:5047,744+21
26 Oct 2026, 09:4547,723+24
25 Oct 2026, 12:3647,699+3
24 Oct 2026, 14:0747,696+32
23 Oct 2026, 17:1647,664+14
22 Oct 2026, 15:3147,650+25
21 Oct 2026, 07:4047,625+33
20 Oct 2026, 07:4847,592first reading

Engagement

135 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 187 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
44.3%
avg views ÷ 47,959 subscribers
Avg views / post
21,200
36 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.425%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
36
of 135 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held135 (2 August 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total764,190
Reactions total3,251
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 12:41 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,050
Videos
≈1
Links
≈909

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
16s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

13,129 reactions across 135 posts, in 43 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4,66535.5%
❤2,90722.1%
🔥1,55411.8%
👎7435.66%
🤬6104.65%
😁5113.89%
💩3312.52%
👏2742.09%
🤨2401.83%
🤡2141.63%
🤯1621.23%
🤔1531.17%
🤣1531.17%
🤮1180.899%
😭910.693%
😎770.586%
😱730.556%
🥰320.244%
🖕270.206%
😨260.198%
23 further kinds1681.28%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 135 of the 135 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,129 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 135 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
29
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 135 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
13
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @djun1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 135 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 8 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
72.6%
98 of 135 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
98
posts carrying an erid · 58 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
18,900
over 98 measured posts
Median views · rest
19,300
over 37 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
5jtCeReNx12oajzfW1DYtdC85 August 20261 October 2026
5jtCeReNx12oajzg17JJnuV51 October 20268 November 2026
2SDnjc8rrrM417 August 202615 September 2026
2SDnjcbCNV942 August 202620 September 2026
5jtCeReNx12oajzg17GsVdV45 August 20261 October 2026
5jtCeReNx12oajzg17JK8K8412 August 202616 October 2026
5jtCeReNx12oajzgWDfQEmp412 August 202618 September 2026
5jtCeReNx12oajzhVCCp5My426 August 20268 November 2026
5jtCeReNx12oajzg17JK8md35 August 202612 September 2026
2SDnjcikPDN226 October 20267 November 2026
2SDnjdwotX4220 August 20263 September 2026
2SDnje2tdye219 October 20263 November 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it. 46 further tokens are held for this entry and not listed here.

Measured over the 135 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 8 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 9 of 36 posts held from the last 30 days (25.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

8 Nov 2026, 10:29 UTC≈5,560 views4 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Advertisementerid 5jtCeReNx12oajzg17JJnuVPhoto

https://market.yandex.ru/cc/BMqVgR?erid=5jtCeReNx12oajzg17JJnuV https://market.yandex.ru/cc/BVz7AK?erid=5jtCeReNx12oajzg17JJnuV Xiaomi Redmi G27Q 240Hz ~ 15,5 тр/ 14,7тр (до конца дня пока не кончился 1тр промик. Второй вариант дешевле но меньше отзывов у магаза) 27" IPS 2560x1440 240hz Традиционный имхо лучший цена-качество вариант если не нужен miniLED. Мой обзор. После обзора матрицу меняли, возможно охваты уже …

❤4

8 Nov 2026, 10:16 UTC≈6,200 views8 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Advertisementerid 5jtCeReNx12oajzhVCCp5MyPhoto

Выгодные котлетные 24" от TCL, пока жив промокод на 1тр - дают прямо на странице товара под ценой: https://market.yandex.ru/cc/BVykkk?erid=5jtCeReNx12oajzhVCCp5My TCL 25P1AD - 9тр (добавьте в корзину чтото самое дешевое за 10-50р чтобы перевалить за 10тр порог) 24,5" IPS 1920x1080 300гц, нога простая, только наклон. Тестов нет, но TCL должен быть ок. По этой цене локально выглядит самым интересным цена-качество бю…

👍5❤2🤣1

8 Nov 2026, 09:52 UTC≈6,930 views133 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Advertisementerid 2SDnjcNFhmNPhoto

https://ali.click/smgcq1u?erid=2SDnjcNFhmN TOPPING KB22 - 20тр Настоящее гик-извращенство от Topping. Выглядит как клава, но почему стоит 20тр за обрубок? И почему аудиофильский топпинг полез в клавиатуры? Потому что это - аудионитерфейс! :)) Т.е. тут проф звуковуха внутри клавиатуры, есть замеры Амира, и DAC и ADC там хайфайного уровня. Идея в экономии места на столе.

🤡77🤣22❤‍🔥20🤔11🗿3

7 Nov 2026, 12:37 UTC≈12,900 views140 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Т.к. видос абсолютно полностью тотально бесконтрольно всецело и полномасштабно продажный (аппарат выдали для обзора), приурочили его к завозу партии мониторов в свой магаз и дали промокод на 1тр сверху. упд. еще и снизили цену. наверняка это временно. https://ozon.ru/t/1fl0wT7 Titan Army G27P9 Ultra ~ 45тр 42тр (с пошлиной и промкодом TTNRM3CC63B7) 26,5 QD-OLED gen4 2560x1440 320гц (без комплектной ножки) Вариант…

🔥70😁47❤16👍5👎2

7 Nov 2026, 12:32 UTC≈12,700 views108 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Тестирую QD-OLED gen4 монитора Titan Army G27P9 Ultra 26,5 QD-OLED 2560x1440 320гц. Это снова модель без ножки, (у титанов есть вариант с ножкой примерно на 1.5-2тр дороже - это G27W9S Ultra) Сравниваю gen3 и gen4 поколение QD-OLED в плане яркости и отражающих способностей покрытия и все остальные тесты как обычно тоже. Смотреть: https://youtu.be/_s-YQV2EQoY Видеосодержащий продукт: Рутруп | ВКвидео

👍88❤13🔥3🆒3🎉1

7 Nov 2026, 07:01 UTC≈13,500 views56 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Advertisementerid 2SDnjcikPDNPhoto

Проверил, что из подборки ЦАПов (внешних звуковых карт) стало дешевле на распродаже. На старшие модели действительно есть хорошие скидки. https://ali.click/6bfoo13?erid=2SDnjcikPDN S.M.S.L DS100 - 6,4тр (не изменялось) https://ali.click/0km3q17?erid=2SDnjbyej88 TOPPING DX1 II - 8тр (подешевело на 1тр) https://ali.click/uofoo13?erid=2SDnjcyabWk FiiO K11 R2R -12тр (не изменялось) https://ali.click/r0aid12?erid=2SD…

❤31👍18👎4🤣3

6 Nov 2026, 06:38 UTC≈15,900 views185 reactions1 Starread 8 November 2026
Photo

У нас в чате вайбкодят софт для подавления ореолов/окантовок на QD-OLED. Желающие могут проверить и отписаться как работает. https://github.com/RuttiTuttii/fringefix/releases/tag/v0.5.3 p.s. Это нужно только тем, у кого QD-OLED gen3-gen4 поколений, кто видит эти ореолы на тексте и страдает по этому поводу. У вас не QD-OLED - вам не надо. У вас QD-OLED, но вас не парят эти ореолы или вы их вообще не замечаете - в…

🤨94👍65🔥18👎6🖕2

5 Nov 2026, 08:43 UTC≈17,000 views59 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Акция на мониторы Gigabyte также и в трех буквах. GIGABYTE MO27Q28GR - 55тр 27" WOLED gen4 2560x1440 280гц, Type-C + KVM Версия с глянцевым покрытием экрана, считается одним из самых интересных вариантов WOLED, это самое крутое покрытие в плане подавления бликов и внешнего освещения из всех оледов. На рынке таких только две модели - эта и у Asus. Также, хаб, RWGB структура которая почти не ломает клиртайп и не созд…

❤30👏12💩11👎3😁3

5 Nov 2026, 08:27 UTC≈16,200 views30 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Advertisementerid 5jtCeReNx12oak2tUX9C111Photo

https://market.yandex.ru/cc/BUPoxK?erid=5jtCeReNx12oak2tUX9C111 Redmi X27GQ 2025 - 12тр По отзывам в чате - абсолютно тот же G27Q 2025 с обзора. 27" IPS 2560x1440 180гц, простая нога только наклон. При низкой цене неплохо как бюджетный вариант или второй монитор.

👍19👎7❤2💩1🖕1

5 Nov 2026, 08:20 UTC≈16,400 views66 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Advertisementerid 2SDnjePCeCcPhoto

https://ali.click/48xrp1h?erid=2SDnjePCeCc Xiaomi Redmi Book 16 - 58тр c пошлиной 16" IPS FHD 60hz, i5-12450H, DDR5 16GB, SSD 512GB

👎37🤯16💩5🗿5👍3

4 Nov 2026, 05:26 UTC≈19,700 views31 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Advertisementerid 5jtCeReNx12oak2tUJ5ayqrPhoto

https://market.yandex.ru/cc/BToxgp?erid=5jtCeReNx12oak2tUJ5ayqr Acer KG271UZ2bmiipx - 16,5тр 27" IPS 2560x1440 275hz Альтернатива для тех кто хочет более брендовое. Тестов нет, подставка - только наклон. Зато продает Мвидео, гарантия 3 года.

👍22👎4❤3💩1🖕1

4 Nov 2026, 05:22 UTC≈18,600 views49 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Advertisementerid 5jtCeReNx12oajzg17JJnuVPhoto

Летняя цена на G27Q 240гц https://market.yandex.ru/cc/BTouex?erid=5jtCeReNx12oajzg17JJnuV Xiaomi Redmi G27Q 240Hz ~ 15 тр (возможен рандом по аккаунтам) 27" IPS 2560x1440 240hz Имхо лучший цена-качество вариант если не нужен miniLED. Мой обзор. После обзора матрицу меняли, возможно охваты уже другие.

👍34❤8👎5💩1🖕1

Showing the 12 most recent of 135 posts we hold for @djun1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@djun1 edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
19 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 November 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @djun1 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
17 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
17 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
4 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

27 Oct 2026, 07:00 UTCAnonymous Poll7,560 voters approx.

Как часто (и как) вы меняете яркость монитора

  1. Обычно настраиваю один раз и меняю/подстраиваю потом очень редко81%
  2. Подстраиваю яркость часто, использую настройку "яркость" в мониторе10%
  3. Меняю часто, использую настроенные "режимы" или "пресеты" монитора4%
  4. Меняю часто, использую программу управления с компьютера4%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Sept 2026, 09:02 UTCAnonymous Poll5,560 voters approx.

Как вам идея вендоров продавать монитор без подставки? Естественно если такой вариант будет дешевле чем с подставкой, а не как с зарядками для телефонов.

  1. Позитивно, давно пользуюсь кронштейном, не хочу платить за подставку.43%
  2. Не пользуюсь кронштейном, но позитивно (если захочу сэкономить интересный вариант)25%
  3. Негативно, монитор должен идти с какой-то подставкой чтобы можно было работать сразу из коробки.31%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 135 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 8 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Джун Техобзоры” (@djun1), 47,959 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/djun1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.