Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for долбаебы китай вирта

Channel

долбаебы китай вирта

@dlbcvirta

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

21subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003670418960
TypeChannel
Username@dlbcvirta
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 21 January 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 31 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dlbcvirta

Growth

212221.510 August 2026 — 22 subscribers11 August 2026 — 22 subscribers19 August 2026 — 21 subscribers10 August 202619 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21–22 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Aug 2026, 05:0421-1
11 Aug 2026, 13:1622no change
10 Aug 2026, 21:1522first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 21 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10m 08s
Average length
10m 08s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

75 reactions across 9 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54000308003662906592330.7%
custom 53213668250726084152026.7%
💯1216.0%
🌚79.33%
45.33%
❤‍🔥34.00%
custom 539793905680386069322.67%
custom 599238495459449669222.67%
22.67%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 75 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 21 January 2026 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 14 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dlbcvirta. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 January 2026 to 25 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

25 Jul 2026, 15:59 UTC160 viewsread 11 August 2026

Долбаебы китай вирта вернулись, ждите новые проекты и обсуждение нового поколения долбаебов.

22 Apr 2026, 20:33 UTC695 viewsread 11 August 2026

анон: +79337339452 Слитый номер кого же?)) ответ: хуй его знает, дружок. тебе делать нехуй?

22 Jan 2026, 18:22 UTC≈1,150 views11 reactions3 Starsread 11 August 2026

хотите, чтобы мы открыли какую-нибудь рубрику? что еще хотите видеть у нас на канале?

💯4custom 54000308003662906593🌚2custom 53213668250726084152

22 Jan 2026, 11:05 UTC≈1,150 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026

анон: КФ для сдорамщиков — это вообще классная тема, китайская тематика сама по себе очень крутая. Но почему тогда в разговорах и в общении почти нет Китая или c-drama? Всё сводится к обычным повседневным разговорам, как у простых людей. Китайской остаётся лишь внешняя часть: оформление, персы, тренды. А само общение — совсем не по теме. Почему тогда просто не открыть обычное вирт-общение? Да, многие говорят, что в К

💯2custom 540003080036629065921🌚1custom 53213668250726084151custom 59923849545944966921

22 Jan 2026, 10:26 UTC852 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026

анон: Что думаете про ссору о воровстве нью,связанную с ниссой, дин и шин юй? мнение интересно услышать. ответ: Если честно, свидетелей тех конфликтов много, и наша администрация собрала показания, а также взяла интервью у одной из трёх - Дин. По данным, которые нам предоставила Дин, и тому, что мы уже знаем, можем сказать, что относимся к Шин Юй как к владельцу кф и личности нейтрально-негативно. Потому что незнан

custom 53213668250726084154custom 53979390568038606931custom 54000308003662906591custom 59923849545944966921

22 Jan 2026, 10:04 UTC723 viewsread 11 August 2026

анон: Долбаебы Китай вирта это сам админ ответ: нормально выражайтесь. лично вам от имени нашего канала были притензий? переходить на личность без оснований - плохо.

22 Jan 2026, 10:00 UTC634 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

это сообщение и его автор идут нахуй, потому что за 4 часа не было предоставлено ни одного доказательства.

custom 53213668250726084152custom 54000308003662906592

22 Jan 2026, 05:09 UTC596 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026

анон: Довольно интересно, и если хотите, у кого хотите? ответ: думаем, Нисса, Нанами и еще пару личностей. С кем получится собрать хороший материал - с тем и будет интервью.

custom 53213668250726084153custom 54000308003662906592🌚1

22 Jan 2026, 05:05 UTC570 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026

анон: Планируете ли вы взять у кого нибудь ещё интервью? ответ: если будет спрос и интересная тема - с радостью, а пока у монтажера отдых (пускай надеется).

custom 54000308003662906593custom 532136682507260841521🌚1

22 Jan 2026, 04:33 UTC570 viewsread 11 August 2026

анон: Кто на данный момент самый популярный и скандальный долбаёб? ответ: не знаем даже как на это правильно ответить… у каждого свой долбаеб, предложите свои варианты в комментах, а мы проведем опрос.

22 Jan 2026, 04:21 UTC≈1,060 views16 reactions2 Starsread 11 August 2026
Video

ИНТЕРВЬЮ С ВЛАДЕЛЬЦАМИ САМЫХ ПОПУЛЯРНЫХ КЗ И РУ КФ В КИТАЙВИРТЕ — сыпем соль на старые раны; — говорим о конфликтах и том, что обычно остаётся за кадром; — кто и почему называл Дин «хуёвым» владельцем; — смены совладельцев, предательства и шпионы; — почему Айминь считает, что у китайвирта нет будущего. Смотрите, слушайте и делайте выводы сами. полная текстовая версия - для тех, кто любит читать.

custom 54000308003662906597custom 532136682507260841552🌚1custom 53979390568038606931

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @dlbcvirta. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“долбаебы китай вирта” (@dlbcvirta), 21 subscribers as measured 19 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dlbcvirta.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.