Channel
DMT LOGICS
@dmtlogics
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,518subscribers
-252 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001737929886 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dmtlogics |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 2 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 18 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dmtlogics |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Oct 2026, 13:48 | 4,518 | -8 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 16:37 | 4,526 | -9 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 20:11 | 4,535 | -21 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 15:54 | 4,556 | -28 |
| 1 Oct 2026, 21:16 | 4,584 | -54 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 16:39 | 4,638 | -9 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 02:57 | 4,647 | -8 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 21:18 | 4,655 | -24 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:03 | 4,679 | -9 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 21:42 | 4,688 | no change |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:27 | 4,688 | -17 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:08 | 4,705 | -13 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:34 | 4,718 | -13 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 22:14 | 4,731 | -14 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 13:39 | 4,745 | -9 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:46 | 4,754 | -14 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:48 | 4,768 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:30 | 4,770 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@masscoders · 69,230
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 28 August 2026
@ManabadiInter · 29,364
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 6 September 2026
@SreedharsCCE · 141,035
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 13 August 2026
@DefenceDarling · 32,998
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 4 September 2026
@DANDUVENKATRAMULU · 25,634
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 12 September 2026
@UFJChannel · 26,805
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 10 September 2026
@shyaminstitutekakinada2001 · 100,617
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 15 August 2026
@Osmania · 28,541
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 9 September 2026
@APGovtSchemes · 39,773
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 30 August 2026
@FreeJobAlertOfficially · 271,863
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DMT LOGICS” (@dmtlogics), 4,518 subscribers as measured 19 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dmtlogics.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.