Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Склад статистики и исследований Dnative

Channel

Склад статистики и исследований Dnative

@dnative_sklad

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

16,835subscribers

+89 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001211727769
TypeChannel
Username@dnative_sklad
Created23 June 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/dnative_sklad

Growth

16,74616,83516,790.56 August 2026 — 16,746 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,746 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,749 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,752 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,751 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,755 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,757 subscribers14 August 2026 — 16,755 subscribers15 August 2026 — 16,759 subscribers16 August 2026 — 16,758 subscribers17 August 2026 — 16,757 subscribers18 August 2026 — 16,760 subscribers20 August 2026 — 16,763 subscribers21 August 2026 — 16,765 subscribers22 August 2026 — 16,766 subscribers24 August 2026 — 16,757 subscribers25 August 2026 — 16,760 subscribers26 August 2026 — 16,791 subscribers27 August 2026 — 16,801 subscribers28 August 2026 — 16,796 subscribers29 August 2026 — 16,801 subscribers30 August 2026 — 16,800 subscribers31 August 2026 — 16,795 subscribers1 September 2026 — 16,798 subscribers2 September 2026 — 16,793 subscribers5 September 2026 — 16,835 subscribers6 August 20265 September 2026
26 measurements spanning 30 days, net +89. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,733–16,848 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 17:0016,835+42
2 Sept 2026, 08:4816,793-5
1 Sept 2026, 12:0516,798+3
31 Aug 2026, 13:5216,795-5
30 Aug 2026, 12:0416,800-1
29 Aug 2026, 09:2716,801+5
28 Aug 2026, 09:4416,796-5
27 Aug 2026, 06:4416,801+10
26 Aug 2026, 04:4316,791+31
25 Aug 2026, 03:4416,760+3
24 Aug 2026, 00:5716,757-9
22 Aug 2026, 10:1416,766+1
21 Aug 2026, 03:0616,765+2
20 Aug 2026, 00:1316,763+3
18 Aug 2026, 23:1616,760+3
17 Aug 2026, 23:5616,757-1
16 Aug 2026, 21:4516,758-1
15 Aug 2026, 17:0816,759+4
14 Aug 2026, 07:5416,755-2
11 Aug 2026, 18:1216,757first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 14 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.8%
avg views ÷ 16,835 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,990
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.754%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held10 (14 April 202627 August 2026)
Views total3,980
Reactions total30
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 09:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

301 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍16253.8%
🔥5417.9%
👎5016.6%
🤯3511.6%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 301 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 14 April 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 11:44 UTC≈1,540 views14 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Как работать в диджитал без штрафов Приходите на Юр.FAQ* Блогеры и бизнес и слушайте, как блогеры, агентства и юристы видят изменения на рынке и как обезопасить свой контент юридически Что будет: 👉 Как меняется работа площадок 👉 Как работают фабрики контента и брендмедиа 👉 Изнанка ugc-креаторства 👉 Авторское право в ИИ-контенте Когда: 9 сентября ⬜️ Купить билет по сниженной цене

👍9🔥5

26 Aug 2026, 13:38 UTC≈2,440 views16 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Сколько стоят просмотры у блогеров в РФ на разных платформах Коммуникационное агентство DIDENOK TEAM представило актуальные средние показатели CPV у блогеров в TikTok, YouTube, Telegram и VK. Методология: анализ внутренних смет и прайсов на рекламные размещения у блогеров за период с июля 2025 года по июль 2026 года. В выборку вошли данные от 550 блогеров в Telegram, 700 — на YouTube, 500 — во VK и 650 — в TikTok.

👍15👎1

14 Jul 2026, 09:48 UTC≈4,970 views15 reactionsread 3 September 2026
File

Каким видит рынок интернет-рекламы РФ2025 ЕРИР Бюджет — 691 млрд ₽, 1,25 млн рекламодателей и 1,42 млрд креативов. 554 тыс ₽ — средний годовой бюджет рекламодателя. «Средний бюджет» сильно завышен. 84 рекламодателя с бюджетом свыше 1 млрд ₽ это 0,01% игроков, но 34,3% всех денег (≈237 млрд ₽). Крупный бизнес в целом: 2,5% рекламодателей и 63,5% бюджетов. При этом 99,77% рекламодателей тратят меньше 20 млн ₽/год и д

👍13🤯2

1 Jun 2026, 13:23 UTC≈6,090 views28 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @dnativePhoto

Нейросети и российский маркетинг, результаты исследования 2026 Главный вывод — мы все пока спокойны относительно будущего. Так случилось, что больше половины респондентов были крепкие мидлы и выше, поэтому они вообще не беспокоятся, видя насколько инструмент не справляется в маркетинговых задачах. Точнее нейронка не работает сама по себе, она отличный инструмент, если знать, что просить и что хотеть получить на вых

🔥19👍9

22 May 2026, 12:08 UTC≈6,690 views83 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

ЛУЧШЕЕ ВРЕМЯ Постинга в МАХ. Моё мнение — лучшее время для постинга в МАХ тогда, когда белые списки включают. Вот это реально лучшее время) Но если про статистику, то Livedune собрал данные по 22,5 млн постов с начала 2026 года. Самым эффективным временем для публикации оказался 21:00 воскресенья и полночь с воскресенья на понедельник — именно такие посты набирают максимальное количество просмотров. За 100% в иссл

👎41🤯28👍11🔥3

27 Apr 2026, 11:52 UTC≈6,060 views32 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Сколько зарабатывают в маркетинге? Я годами делал исследование зарплат в SMM, но теперь интересен весь рынок, а не только его часть. Поэтому я сделал аналитический сервис зарплат в маркетинге с поэтическим названием Vetka.dnative.ru В базе уже больше 10 тысяч анкет собранных за все годы моего анализа + данные по 15 тысяч анкет с зарплатами за это же время. Можно посмотреть не только на весь рынок https://vetka.dn

👍26🤯5👎1

27 Apr 2026, 09:54 UTC≈5,740 views25 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Исследование исследований Я люблю аналитику и обожаю цифры, графики и таблицы. Но иногда вижу такое, во что сложно поверить. Нашёл причину — половина исследований тупо врёт) Свежая статья в журнале Nature как раз про это. Семилетний проект, в рамках которого исследователи проанализировали почти 4000 научных работ в разных категориях и попробовали воспроизвести результаты. Получилось в половине случаев. Во многих с

👍13🔥11👎1

20 Apr 2026, 07:19 UTC≈5,460 views28 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Топ 50 рекламодателей YouTube с охватами за март 2026 года https://dashboards.6-sense.pro/youtube-monitoring-march/

🔥16👍10👎2

16 Apr 2026, 07:20 UTC≈9,250 views36 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Как изменяются охваты в Telegram после замедления WIB сделали срез по статистике 22 тысяч каналов Медианные просмотры просели на 38% Количество постов упало на 12% Сумма просмотров упала на 30% Стало интересно сравнить с тем, как падали охваты в Инсте в 2022 году. Так вот, там падение 20-30% было в Stories и произошло тоже сразу, но дальше практически не менялись в первый год. А вот падение в ReachRate постов, по

👍36

14 Apr 2026, 09:05 UTC≈4,890 views24 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Photo

А вот и результаты полевого исследования доверия «рынка» к просмотрам на платформах Всего 122 участника приняло участие в опросе. Странно, что не было Reels в списке платформ только.

👍20👎4

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @dnative_sklad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

DNative — блог Ткачука про SMM
@dnative · 82,033
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 18 August 2026
Саша Чижов
@blogsmm · 38,338
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 31 August 2026
Экспертосфера
@expertosphere · 29,666
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 8 September 2026
Маркировка и налог на рекламу: главные новости (ЕРИР)
@adv_system · 30,114
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 7 September 2026
Нильсен
@nielsenrussia · 33,688
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 4 September 2026
chad
@chadgpt_ru · 136,458
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Склад статистики и исследований Dnative” (@dnative_sklad), 16,835 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dnative_sklad.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.