Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 41 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,411–1,427 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 09:01
1,425
+8
12 Sept 2026, 06:16
1,417
+1
8 Sept 2026, 04:37
1,416
+1
3 Sept 2026, 11:00
1,415
+2
28 Aug 2026, 15:34
1,413
-1
26 Aug 2026, 00:14
1,414
-2
22 Aug 2026, 21:24
1,416
-1
19 Aug 2026, 05:42
1,417
-2
16 Aug 2026, 07:25
1,419
-2
13 Aug 2026, 03:54
1,421
+5
10 Aug 2026, 06:46
1,416
-3
6 Aug 2026, 11:45
1,419
no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:30
1,419
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
296 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
147
49.7%
❤
105
35.5%
🔥
24
8.11%
🤝
6
2.03%
🤔
4
1.35%
👀
3
1.01%
💘
3
1.01%
💯
2
0.676%
❤🔥
1
0.338%
🤯
1
0.338%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 296 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
С виду самый обычный одноразовый пакет, но если присмотреться, то замечаем Расуловский "Мой Дагестан", лезгинку в парном танце, вольную борьбу, без которого Дагестан представить невозможно и конечно горы. Кажется, идея хорошая, но не на однаразовом пакете же её реализовывать, обиталищем которого становится мусорная свалка. И к тому же, Дагестан разве ничем другим не ассоциируется?
https://t.me/dnevnikteologa/1494
Эксклюзивно делюсь с вами обложкой книги "Ухуд. Испытание на прочность", которая уже печатается и ждёт своего выхода. Презентация книги ожидается в сентябре, после чего книга будет доступна книголюбителям и в особенности тем, кто живо интересуется эпизодами из жизни нашего любимого Пророка ﷺ. А эпизод произошедший у горы Ухуд - один из самых драматичных и трагичных в истории Ислама. Первая книга этой серии "Бадр. Пер…
Публикация, вызвавшая самый настоящий фурор в Инстаграме (запрещенной в РФ): тысячи просмотров, огромное количество комментариев, лайков и репостов. Это говорит о нетлеющем интересе к истории Дагестана и его героям. Но вместе с этим, к публикации прилетели "умники", "знатоки мазхабов", однозначно утверждающие о запретности мавзолеев и усыпальниц. Кто-то назвал даже это ширком. Эту тему можно отдельно рассмотреть, а п…
Место исторической сакли, где укрывались от натиска царских войск 15 храбрецов, включая имама Газимухаммада и будущего имама - Шамиля. В этих трагических событиях выжили лишь двое
https://t.me/dnevnikteologa/1491
Эти книги ждут тех, кто с нами завтра отправится в Ахульго. Но для этого нужно ответить на наши исторические вопросы. Мы пытаемся разнообразить и скрасить этот проект, и проведение викторины по дороге становится уже доброй традицией. Группа на завтра сформирована, хотя, казалось, что это будет сложно, но в дагестанцах еще горит искра исторической памяти, и Ахульго остается особенным местом, куда хочется возвращаться.…
Вот это явление в науке принято называть клиповым мышлением, когда информация воспринимается не цельно, а фрагментарно. Идеологически подкачанные ребята нашли нужное для себя высказывание имама Газимухаммада и убежденно ретранслируют его на всех и вся. Зачем им копаться, примерять на себя роль исследователя и просто читать, если "истина" на поверхности. От такого узколобового мышления рождается убеждение, что имамы Д…
Один из ярких примеров, когда незнание приводит к ошибочным, непопулярным выводам. Человек увидел многотомник имама аш-Шафи'а под названием الأم (мать) и подумал, что эта книга о добром отношении к матерям. Было бы конечно неплохо, но эта книга по исламскому праву (фикхи). Имам аш-Шафи'и так зашифривовал значимость этой книги для всего шафиитского мазхаба.
Знание - сила, а невежество - тьма
https://t.me/dnevnikteo…
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dnevnikteologa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 9 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Сколько раз Посланник Аллаhа ﷺ совершал малый хадж (Умра)?
Один раз14%
Два раза19%
Три раза17%
Четыре раза45%
Пять раз5%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Дневник теолога” (@dnevnikteologa), 1,425 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dnevnikteologa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.