Channel
@dny_baoguang
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
136,170subscribers
-10,177 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001237587499 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dny_baoguang |
| Description | 💕投稿/商务合作： @dashijianya 东南亚曝光-悬赏-吃瓜： https://t.me/dny_baoguang 专注东南亚 ：求职 | 招聘 | 找工作 | 聘人才 👏🏻欢迎致力东南亚社区:国内/海外同胞 找到合适人才，找到🈵意工作！注意安全 ，荣归故里！ #东南亚 #柬埔寨 #菲律宾 #缅甸 #泰国#迪拜 #越南 #印度尼西亚 专注于东南 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dny_baoguang |
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
37.0 average views per post against 136,170 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.027%. Across the 7,046 registered channels in the same cohort — 100,014–316,163 subscribers — the middle half sit between 1.90% and 13.5%, with a median of 5.50%.
| Window | 30 days (1 September 2026 – 1 October 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 636 of 636 published in the window (636 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 23,503 |
| Mature posts only | 0.045% over 9 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 136,170 measured 24 September 2026 |
| Cohort | b100000 · 7,046 channels · p10 0.567% · p25 1.90% · p50 5.50% · p75 13.5% · p90 26.0% |
| Position in cohort | 0.539th percentile · 1/200 the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.212% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Chinese · 100.0% of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 1 October 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Sept 2026, 22:21 | 136,170 | -960 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 21:19 | 137,130 | -250 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 11:41 | 137,380 | -159 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 14:19 | 137,539 | -346 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 00:19 | 137,885 | -446 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 03:59 | 138,331 | -1,260 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 07:19 | 139,591 | -1,020 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 23:18 | 140,611 | -278 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:34 | 140,889 | -394 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:58 | 141,283 | -233 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 07:08 | 141,516 | -262 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:49 | 141,778 | -235 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:11 | 142,013 | -211 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 142,224 | -139 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:08 | 142,363 | -93 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:02 | 142,456 | -157 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 01:53 | 142,613 | -223 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:58 | 142,836 | -423 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 10:36 | 143,259 | -315 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 23:54 | 143,574 | first reading |
927 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 116 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 636 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 927 (30 July 2026 – 30 September 2026) |
| Views total | 23,503 |
| Reactions total | 11 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Sept 2026, 23:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 322 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
31 reactions across 29 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 21 | 67.7% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 9.68% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 6.45% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 6.45% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 6.45% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 3.23% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 927 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 927 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 30 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#德州扑克 #HHpoker #德州扑克俱乐部 德州扑克-为什么有钱人都爱玩德扑？ #德扑 #德扑竞技 #德州扑克 俱乐部特色： 1️⃣ 千人俱乐部，模拟线下真实对局，玩家们尽情博弈！ 2️⃣ 丰富玩法：除了经典德州扑克，还有推推乐、牛仔小游戏、奥马哈等多种选择！ 3️⃣ 优质牌局：严格禁伙牌，联盟24小时巡桌，确保每局公平公正！ 4️⃣ 每日福利：签到、天牌奖励、大牌奖励等惊喜不断，福利满满！ 💡 俱乐部优势： 🕐 全天24小时开局，随时随地畅玩！ 💰 支持微信、支付宝、USDT、汇旺等多种支付方式，充值方便！ 选择HHpoker，是业内最大、公信力最强的线上德州扑克约局平台，与全球德扑高手一较高下！ 诚信靠谱 | 线上德州扑克俱乐部 🤵🏻♀️俱乐部唯一客服接待：@xingchen_CLUB
#群友投稿：致还在东南亚努力奋斗的人 真的很累吗？ 累就对了。 一个人背井离乡，来到东南亚讨生活，谁不是一边咬牙坚持，一边告诉自己再熬一熬？ 苦，是生活给你的考验。 累，是为了以后能少吃一点苦。 变，是因为环境逼着人成长。 忍，是在异国他乡学会的本事。 静，是经历过很多事后的沉淀。 舍，是懂得有些东西该放下。 做，才有可能拥有。 如果你现在觉得特别辛苦，别急着否定自己。 容易走的，往往都是下坡路。 真正难走的路，才需要一步一步往上爬。 一个人在东南亚漂着不容易， 没人知道你经历了什么，也没人知道你为了生活熬过多少个夜晚。 所以，再坚持一下。 不是因为苦难值得歌颂， 而是希望有一天，你能真正走出这段日子， 不用再为了生活低头， 也不用再告诉自己“再熬一熬”。 愿所有还在东南亚漂泊的人， 最后都能有一个属于自己的“上岸”。
#群友投稿：公开声明｜关于林东、南风、佑东等相关人员 此前文章： 林东、南风、秋杰（后改名佑东）等人，你们应该知道我是谁。 据我目前掌握的情况，宝龙四9号园区相关人员在今年3月底园区被打击后，转移至缅甸三佛塔瀑布等地继续活动。南风因涉嫌“飞单”被下调，秋杰（现名佑东）随后担任主管。据我掌握的信息，佑东及部分小组长也涉嫌“飞单”等问题。 此外，我还掌握有关园区内部暴力殴打、电击员工、拖欠工资以及人员伤亡等情况的线索。相关事实我正在进一步核实，并整理聊天记录、人员资料、资金记录及其他证据。 包括你诈骗国内受害者那么多钱，有几个人他的老公女婿都是国家级的干部，你知道这个后果的。不然我把你们的信息发给他们，他们去找你的家人就不是单纯的这么简单了。包括你们，你不要想着逃到天涯海角，人家就找不到你。不要忘记陈志是怎么回去的，只是时间未到。如果不相信我，不介意再让你们火一下，到时候你们回去就不单单是坐牢这么简单的，迟早要吃枪子。 …
金边森速区今天继续扫楼 未发现电诈犯罪 今天，金边市森速区统一指挥部对辖区内10处外籍人员居住点展开行政排查。经核查，现场仅登记在册2名中国籍人员。 警方确认，上述人员持合法有效护照及居住签证，现场未发现网络技术诈骗犯罪行为。 扫了一天，就发现2个在册中国人 都走鸟，都走鸟～～
#群友曝光：• “特”和“皮卡”是中介。 • 两名巴西员工是由他们介绍到菲律宾公司工作的。 • 公司已经按照中介合作约定，分别向中介支付了 4,000 美元/每人，合计 8,000 美元。 出现的问题 • 中介在收到中介费后，没有按照约定向其对接人员结算相关佣金，而是将这部分佣金自行留存。导致其他对接人找到我们公司，让公司名誉受损， • 两名员工进入公司以后，中介仍然私下联系员工，并试图将本公司员工介绍、带到其他公司。 • 最终，这两名巴西员工已经被中介叫走，离开公司。 给公司造成的损失 • 中介费：约 8,000 美元 • 物业及运营成本 • 员工借支 目前综合计算，公司此次损失约 20,000 美元。此事件这几个人是联合操作，所有人看到这几个人要避坑。
#网友投稿：我在马来西亚这么多年，自己也碰到过不少专门针对中国人的骗局，准备来马来西亚的话，这几种常见套路一定要留个心眼。 第一，刚落地机场时，不要轻易相信主动上来搭话的人，尤其是突然很着急地跟你说钱包丢了、让你帮忙转账之类的。有些人会装成游客，专门找刚落地的中国人下手。 第二，逛商场时，如果遇到戴着名表、看起来很像成功人士的人，说自己在云顶输了几十万、上百万，没钱回家，想找你借钱，还递名片说自己是什么总经理、CEO，承诺第二天让公司双倍还给你，这种话不要轻信。我自己就碰到过很多次，这种看起来很假的话术，确实还是会有人上当。 第三，要小心主动搭讪的陌生人。有人可能会提醒你“鞋带开了”之类的，故意转移你的注意力，等你反应过来，东西可能已经不见了。还有一种套路，会让你帮忙拍照，对方看起来像中东人，说自己从迪拜过来，还给你看全家福和身上的美金，再问你人民币长什么样。一旦你相信，把钱包拿出来，转眼人和钱可能都没了。 出去旅游，消…
#群友投稿：我们生下来就是来吃苦的吗？ 来到东南亚以后，越来越多人开始问自己：我吃不了学习的苦，也吃不了生活的苦，可我为什么一定要吃苦？从小到大，父母总告诉我们：“年轻人就应该吃苦。”“吃得苦中苦，方为人上人。”可后来才发现，吃苦和成功之间，好像从来没有画上等号。 工地上的老哥不辛苦吗？一天十几个小时干活，一干就是几十年，省吃俭用、起早贪黑，最后真的就过上了自己想要的生活吗？跑外卖的呢？一天十几个小时在路上，风吹日晒，忙到凌晨，换来的也不过是一笔勉强够生活的钱。 再看看东南亚这些每天坐在电脑前的狗推，白天黑夜颠倒，业绩压在头上，主管盯着、客户骂着、工资还不知道什么时候能拿到。每天工作十几个小时，到最后才发现，自己拼命活着，好像只是为了继续活下去。 所以，父辈口中的“吃苦”，到底有什么意义？如果吃苦只是为了让自己不断忍耐，那我们为什么不能换一种活法？ 人生不是一定要证明自己有多能吃苦。 梅花也许经历寒冬才会开放，但人不…
10名中国人从柬偷渡泰国被抓 泰国警方近日在沙缴、春武里和北大年三地先后抓获10名非法入境的中国人。其中3人称，此前受邀到西港工作，等待8天仍未开工，随后被送往边境，准备经曼谷前往老挝；另有5人计划经泰国前往马来西亚吉隆坡工作。 10名中国人均被控非法入境。此外，警方还抓获3名涉嫌协助偷渡的泰国人，分别被控藏匿、协助非法入境者逃避执法，案件已移交当地警方处理。
飞行员打架，迪拜飞以色列航班迫降 据以色列媒体今天报道，今天早些时候，在一架从阿联酋迪拜飞往以色列特拉维夫的客机上，两名飞行员在飞行途中发生激烈肢体冲突，客机随后在沙特阿拉伯境内机场紧急降落。 据一些媒体推测，一名飞行员企图使飞机坠毁，因为飞机一度快速俯冲。 幸亏打赢了， 如果没打赢 一飞机人全报销～～
#狗推投稿：听盘总的话 小狗推，你是否有很多问号？为什么客户会被反诈？为什么被主管打了又骂，上下蹲五百下？别人都在KTV，我却被电棍电得跳霹雳。我说我要做大大的业绩，却被求职者跳票放飞机。 为什么要听狗主管的话？挨电以后你就会懂了这段话。哼，充电以后我开始明白，为什么我的刀比别人快，杀的业绩比别人多。将来大家看的都是我的红通肖像画，公司话术都是用我写的词。 狗主管的幸福，不让你看见；诈骗的话术，在他心里面。有空就多摸摸女同事的手，把手牵着一起梦游。听狗主管的话，别让他被抓。想快快赔付啊，才能解脱啊。恋爱的想法，杀猪盘发芽；公司的饼啊，吃也吃不完。 在你的未来，诈骗是你的王牌。拿王牌谈个恋爱，哎，我不想把你教坏，还是听主管的话吧。先努力搞业绩吧，但他比我更清楚，你会开始想东想西，想着怎么跑出公司。但我建议你最好先搞业绩。
Posted without readable text
#群友爆料：昨晚凌晨2点万象科晨公寓，老挝警察跟着江苏警察，定点爆破，最近万象来了很多中国叔叔，身上有事情的注意安全了，别接触陌生人，万象到处是特勤。
Showing the 12 most recent of 927 posts we hold for @dny_baoguang. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚-【曝光-悬赏】-新闻资讯” (@dny_baoguang), 136,170 subscribers as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dny_baoguang.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.