Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 东南亚大事件|大事件曝光

Channel

东南亚大事件|大事件曝光

@dnydsjcom

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

71,435subscribers

-6,488 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002143092907
TypeChannel
Username@dnydsjcom
Description#东南亚大事件: 新闻、头条、曝光、爆料、悬赏、☎️商务: @dnyouwen 聚焦东南亚华人圈的最新新闻事件,深度揭秘灰产内幕,记录真实故事,不间断追踪区域内外的动态变化。
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/dnydsjcom

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 5 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@dnydsjcom/2413 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 07:28 UTC@zh_Porn91/33866 Aug 2026, 07:28 UTC1.00under a minute
@dnydsjcom/2414 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 07:29 UTC@zh_Porn91/33876 Aug 2026, 07:29 UTC1.00under a minute
@dnydsjcom/2417 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 07:29 UTC@zh_Porn91/33906 Aug 2026, 07:29 UTC1.00under a minute
@dnydsjcom/2423 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 07:30 UTC@zh_Porn91/33966 Aug 2026, 07:30 UTC1.00under a minute
@dnydsjcom/2431 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 22:26 UTC@zh_Porn91/34007 Aug 2026, 22:26 UTC1.00under a minute
@dnydsjcom/2433 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 22:29 UTC@zh_Porn91/34047 Aug 2026, 22:29 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@zh_Porn9113 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@zh_Porn91 (112)
@dongnanyabocaixinwen7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (70)
@DNYBCBG6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (60)
@dongnanyavip6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (60)
@Laosijibaikezixun6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@Laosijibaikezixun (60)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 17 of the 17 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 19 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 6, the earliest publisher we hold is @zh_Porn91. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 5 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

71,43577,92374,6797 August 2026 — 77,923 subscribers7 August 2026 — 77,923 subscribers8 August 2026 — 77,619 subscribers9 August 2026 — 77,367 subscribers10 August 2026 — 76,821 subscribers11 August 2026 — 76,307 subscribers12 August 2026 — 76,023 subscribers13 August 2026 — 75,656 subscribers14 August 2026 — 75,298 subscribers16 August 2026 — 74,600 subscribers17 August 2026 — 74,096 subscribers18 August 2026 — 73,937 subscribers19 August 2026 — 73,721 subscribers20 August 2026 — 73,609 subscribers21 August 2026 — 73,551 subscribers22 August 2026 — 73,231 subscribers24 August 2026 — 72,930 subscribers25 August 2026 — 72,792 subscribers26 August 2026 — 72,665 subscribers27 August 2026 — 72,613 subscribers28 August 2026 — 72,523 subscribers29 August 2026 — 72,139 subscribers30 August 2026 — 71,704 subscribers31 August 2026 — 71,612 subscribers1 September 2026 — 71,435 subscribers7 August 20261 September 2026
25 measurements spanning 25 days, net -6,488. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 70,462–78,896 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 13:4671,435-177
31 Aug 2026, 15:3571,612-92
30 Aug 2026, 17:3471,704-435
29 Aug 2026, 14:3572,139-384
28 Aug 2026, 12:5272,523-90
27 Aug 2026, 13:2572,613-52
26 Aug 2026, 10:4672,665-127
25 Aug 2026, 07:4272,792-138
24 Aug 2026, 06:0472,930-301
22 Aug 2026, 13:3373,231-320
21 Aug 2026, 03:1773,551-58
20 Aug 2026, 06:5373,609-112
19 Aug 2026, 09:1573,721-216
18 Aug 2026, 12:4673,937-159
17 Aug 2026, 15:0674,096-504
16 Aug 2026, 08:4674,600-698
14 Aug 2026, 16:4875,298-358
13 Aug 2026, 04:5675,656-367
12 Aug 2026, 05:4676,023-284
11 Aug 2026, 08:0676,307first reading

Engagement

95 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.212%
avg views ÷ 71,435 subscribers
Avg views / post
151
95 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.89%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
95
of 95 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 54 of 95 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held95 (6 August 202631 August 2026)
Views total14,356
Reactions total117
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken1 Sept 2026, 16:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,710
Videos
465
Links
1,190

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 1 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
6m 19s
Average length
42s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

117 reactions across 53 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8471.8%
💯3227.4%
👍10.855%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 54 of the 95 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 117 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 95 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Aug 2026, 22:01 UTC31 viewsread 1 September 2026

#频道互推 #相似推荐 ------------------------------ 📢 缅甸缅北东南亚新闻曝光 📢 越南🫰胡志明市·河内·旅游攻略[新闻资讯] 📢 泰国华人柬埔寨新闻曝光 📢 柬埔寨新闻《柬埔寨曝光》 📢 东南亚新闻吃瓜 📢 西港日记 柬埔寨快讯 📢 泰国越南马来西亚新闻曝光 📢 东南亚风云大小事 📢 奥黛🪷 越南新闻娱乐-AoDaiQun 📢 深圳新闻频道 ------------------------------ ☁️ 互推入口:@sososo

31 Aug 2026, 20:25 UTC31 viewsread 1 September 2026
Photo

新群变化快,手动找很容易漏。 SOSO 会展示最近同步的新群入口,适合快速补充新的群组来源。

30 Aug 2026, 21:56 UTC30 viewsread 31 August 2026

#频道互推 #相似推荐 ------------------------------ 📢 东南亚大事件 📢 soso东南亚-百科🌍 📢 东南亚大事件 📢 菲律宾资讯◒《菲律宾曝光》菲律宾新闻 📢 ◒迪拜曝光|迪拜新闻◒ 迪拜资讯 📢 《🇬🇾东南亚新闻》东南亚资讯|东南亚曝光 📢 东南亚新闻网 📢 东南亚大事件 📢 宁波红榜 📢 东南亚大事件曝光(吃瓜)9999.COM独家冠名 ------------------------------ ☁️ 互推入口:@sosoo

30 Aug 2026, 20:20 UTC28 viewsread 31 August 2026
Photo

频道适合看内容,群组更适合继续交流。 SOSO 可以直接找热门群组,也能按关键词搜同类圈子。 先打开看看当前推荐。

29 Aug 2026, 21:51 UTC31 viewsread 30 August 2026

#频道互推 #相似推荐 ------------------------------ 📢 缅甸缅北东南亚新闻曝光 📢 越南🫰胡志明市·河内·旅游攻略[新闻资讯] 📢 泰国华人柬埔寨新闻曝光 📢 柬埔寨新闻《柬埔寨曝光》 📢 东南亚新闻吃瓜 📢 西港日记 柬埔寨快讯 📢 泰国越南马来西亚新闻曝光 📢 东南亚风云大小事 📢 深圳新闻频道 📢 西安☾会所 ------------------------------ ☁️ 互推入口:@SosoCnBot

29 Aug 2026, 20:15 UTC31 viewsread 30 August 2026
Photo

刷到一个频道后,通常还想找更多同类入口。 SOSO 精选频道会随机推荐一批已收录频道。 适合继续发现相近内容。

29 Aug 2026, 15:50 UTC78 views1 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

#网友曝光 🚨 【#大事件曝光】世博旗下「久旺集团」管理里应外合,公然明吃客户 250,000 USDT!信用彻底破产! ⚠️ 币圈、盘圈所有同胞注意:请立刻远离世博旗下所有平台,尤其是「久旺集团」! 今日正式全网曝光黑庄「久旺集团」及其管理团队。他们不仅没有起码的契约精神,更是直接撕下伪装,管理人员公然充当内鬼,玩弄“空查”手段,明吃,强行吞掉客户 250,000 USDT(折合人民币近 180 万元)的巨额资产! 📌 【黑幕还原:25万U是如何被“明吃”的?】 所谓的巨头、所谓的有实力,在暴利面前不过是一场精心设计的骗局! 管理做局,黑吃黑空查把戏做局:久旺集团内部核心管理人员,利用职务之便,甘愿做内鬼。在毫无任何实质证据的情况下,将黑手伸向自家客户。 凭空捏造,“空查”陷害:为了吞钱,久旺管理直接上演了一出“空查”大戏。没有任何风控铁证,全凭管理上下一张嘴,强行给客户扣帽子,直接说别人上了、我这边直接不理 平台默许,公然黑

1

28 Aug 2026, 21:46 UTC38 viewsread 29 August 2026

#频道互推 #相似推荐 ------------------------------ 📢 东南亚大事件 📢 soso东南亚-百科🌍 📢 东南亚大事件 📢 菲律宾资讯◒《菲律宾曝光》菲律宾新闻 📢 ◒迪拜曝光|迪拜新闻◒ 迪拜资讯 📢 《🇬🇾东南亚新闻》东南亚资讯|东南亚曝光 📢 东南亚新闻网 📢 东南亚大事件 📢 东南亚新闻【曝光】 📢 东南亚华人日报50.com钱包 冠名 ------------------------------ ☁️ 互推入口:@souso

28 Aug 2026, 20:10 UTC38 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

在 Telegram 里找内容,先打开 SOSO 搜搜。 频道、群组、帖子、贴纸都可以搜;也可以从发现页继续浏览。

26 Aug 2026, 06:50 UTC150 views3 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

#东南亚大事件 老挝金三角特区持续清剿电诈窝点,267处诈骗场所被关闭 老挝博胶省正持续加强对金三角经济特区内网络诈骗活动的打击。金三角经济特区安全指挥部负责人Anousin Sackpaseuth上校表示,在老挝党中央及公安部部署下,当地已连续开展多轮专项行动。 据官方阶段性数据,截至目前共实施9次清查行动,累计关闭267处涉嫌从事诈骗活动的呼叫中心,并抓获来自16个国家的涉案人员。 其中,中国籍和越南籍人员已陆续被遣返回国,其他外籍人员则由老挝方面与相关国家使馆协调后安排遣返。 对于在相关场所工作的老挝籍人员,当局主要采取书面警告和教育措施,随后安排其返回原籍。 去年8月起,老挝方面曾抽调约250名来自地方执法及网络安全部门的人员组成专项工作组,对特区内4个重点区域展开集中排查。 ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 东南亚华人首选娱乐平台 😂😇😉😍🥰 电子首周亏损包赔100%放心赢 😀😀😀😀😀 首周100%包赢,亏损全额返

3

26 Aug 2026, 06:49 UTC107 views2 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

#泰国资讯:28岁女子遭两人持刀拦截抢劫,被捆绑并企图性侵,嫌疑人还用她手机威胁男友 8月25日,一名28岁女子近日向媒体投诉称,自己在上班途中遭两名男子骑摩托车尾随并拦截。对方持刀威胁,将她强行带到偏僻地区后捆绑手脚、封住嘴巴,并试图对她实施性侵。嫌疑人随后抢走现金,还强迫她提供手机解锁密码,并通过她的手机向男友发送威胁信息及案发地点定位。 受害女子化名“A女士”,28岁。据她透露,8月21日上午约10时,她骑摩托车前往上班途中,发现两名男子骑着另一辆摩托车一路跟随。随后,两人驾驶摩托车靠近并突然逼停她。 坐在后座的男子拿出刀具威胁她停车,随后强行坐上她的摩托车后座,并用布遮住头部、戴上头盔遮挡面部,同时强迫她继续骑车前往一个她无法记住具体路线的地方。 大约行驶12公里后,车辆来到大城府色纳县栋兰分区一处靠近农田、灌溉渠道路旁的偏僻林地。 到达现场后,两名男子将女子的双手和双脚捆绑,并封住她的嘴巴,随后试图脱掉她的衣

2

26 Aug 2026, 06:48 UTC78 views2 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

#东南亚大事件 柬埔寨外交部前高官大肆贩卖C类外交礼遇签证给各类盘总,目前东窗事发,已经被逮捕并接受审判。受此影响,凡是曾经拿过C类签证的人,柬埔寨将永久予以拒绝了~~ ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 东南亚华人首选娱乐平台 😂😇😉😍🥰 电子首周亏损包赔100%放心赢 😀😀😀😀😀 首周100%包赢,亏损全额返还! 😀😀😀😀😀 7T国际实力缔造非凡 ,大额无忧

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 95 posts we hold for @dnydsjcom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“东南亚大事件|大事件曝光” (@dnydsjcom), 71,435 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dnydsjcom.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.