水沟谷继续拆除用于网络詐騙业务的建筑物2026年11月7日 据了解,在 Shwe Kokko(水沟谷)第二区内,曾用于网络诈骗和赌博业务的非法建筑物正在被继续拆除。 目前,正在使用工程机械拆除的一栋6层建筑物已完成90%的拆除工作,另一栋5层建筑物已完成30%。 在 Shwe Kokko 第二区,针对剩余等待拆除的 63 栋建筑物,已进行了分类处置:分为将使用工程机械拆除的建筑物、将采用爆破拆除的建筑物,以及因靠近居民住宅区而将使用人力逐层拆除的建筑物。 截至目前,已完成爆破拆除的建筑物有 4 栋,使用工程机械拆除的建筑物有 5 栋,共计已拆除 9 栋。 据获悉,其余留下的 54 栋建筑物也将继续予以拆除。

Channel
东南亚每日新闻报
@dnymrxwb
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
64,444subscribers
-9,550 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001665306621 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dnymrxwb |
| Description | 每日精选:社会热点 · 治安动态 · 区域快讯 一手掌握柬埔寨、泰国、越南、缅甸、菲律宾等等各国大小事 不碰政治敏感,内容仅供信息参考。 商务合作联系: @xiao1733 投稿爆料联系: @xiao1733 #柬埔寨 #泰国 #越南 #缅甸 #菲律宾 #老挝 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 54 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dnymrxwb |
Topic
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 13:45 | 64,444 | -552 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 13:40 | 64,996 | -218 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 14:30 | 65,214 | -436 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 15:28 | 65,650 | -467 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 17:20 | 66,117 | -1 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 18:16 | 66,118 | -134 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 16:55 | 66,252 | -584 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 13:36 | 66,836 | -728 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 14:36 | 67,564 | -1,470 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 15:54 | 69,034 | -511 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 17:08 | 69,545 | -829 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 14:51 | 70,374 | -997 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 15:25 | 71,371 | +10,438 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 12:26 | 60,933 | +5,233 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 08:54 | 55,700 | -2,005 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 10:14 | 57,705 | -638 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 09:51 | 58,343 | -913 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 06:30 | 59,256 | -483 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 04:08 | 59,739 | -839 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 05:17 | 60,578 | first reading |
Engagement
1,542 posts held, back to 13 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 170 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.547%
- avg views ÷ 64,444 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 352
- 722 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.316%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 722
- of 1,542 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 49 of 722 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,542 (13 August 2026 – 8 November 2026) |
| Views total | 254,438 |
| Reactions total | 48 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 10:52 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈15,800
- Videos
- ≈1,370
- Links
- ≈1,040
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 2h 07m
- Average length
- 20s
Measured directly from 381 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
50 reactions across 50 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎉 | 10 | 20.0% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 14.0% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 14.0% | |
| 🤩 | 7 | 14.0% | |
| ⚡ | 6 | 12.0% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 10.0% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 8.00% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 8.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 51 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 24 September 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 722 posts held from the last 30 days (0.139%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
#群友爆料:一个黑公司在波贝 AGA 附近,坐标:13°39'23.7"N 102°34'18.2"E。 公司位于一处民宿内,里面有十几个人,全都是做国内盘军包。每天全程都是高压模式,每天都要蹲着马步工作,只要没有完成当日任务的,晚上肯定少不了一顿毒打。现在柬埔寨都已经是这样的局势了,还要这样搞高压管理。 这只是其中一个团队,该公司在柬埔寨一共有三个团队。这三个团队的具体位置我都知道,先从最黑的团体开始曝光。老板以及总监一般晚上都在不夜城酒店。 里面的总监、组长以及代理的大头照,我暂时先不曝光。如果不及时整顿,那么自然会出现在这里。 人员结构:总监:阿乐,组长:小豪、九百, 总监:阿乐 阿乐手段极其黑。一线做不出业绩,直接拿手枪出来恐吓一线。打一线也是往死里打,根本没有把一线当做人对待。 阿乐经常半夜12点左右会出现在不夜城酒店,阿乐的大头照后续会出现。 组长:小豪、九百 这两个组长业务能力没有,一天到晚都是睡觉。…
#群友投稿:菲律宾Makati刷单盘口重大避坑,老板卸磨杀驴,拿员工当替罪羊,恶意拖欠工资! 奉劝各位在菲求职的同胞擦亮眼睛,千万别踩这个黑心盘口的坑! 原盘口地址: Makati 阿尔法(Alphaland)17楼。后续转移地: Micson Paint Center(目前已搬离,NBI可调取周边监控追踪其行动轨迹)。 盘口老板: 小泽(福建人)。 管理层: 主管阿亿(夫妻档)、主管阿旭、主管自在(云南人)。 事件经过与黑心操作如下: 1. 遇事花钱捞外籍,拿同胞和老菲当“替罪羊” 今年9月26日,该公司被菲律宾国家调查局(NBI)突击查处,全员40人当晚被带回NBI总部关押。出事后,老板小泽只顾着花钱捞出了30名柬埔寨籍员工,却冷血地将剩下的10名菲律宾入职员工(老菲)直接丢在里面当“替罪羊”受罪,毫无底线可言! 2. 恶意冷处理,断绝基本生活保障 10月2日,部分人员出来后,公司管理层玩起了“失踪”。没有任何后…
#新加坡资讯:再抓获一名柬埔寨诈骗集团通缉嫌疑人!27岁男子从越南遣返回国后落网,涉案集团已7人被捕! 11月6日,新加坡警方逮捕一名涉嫌参与柬埔寨诈骗集团的27岁新加坡籍男子 Lam Yong Yan。这也是该诈骗集团案件中第七名落网的通缉嫌疑人。 据当地媒体报道,该男子此前于2025年11月19日在越南因涉及移民违法问题被捕。完成当地调查后,他于11月6日被遣返回新加坡,并在抵达樟宜机场时遭警方逮捕。 警方调查发现,该集团涉嫌以柬埔寨首都金边为据点,冒充政府官员实施诈骗,专门针对新加坡民众下手。 调查显示,该犯罪集团涉嫌与至少528起诈骗案件有关,累计造成受害者损失约5300万新元。 据了解,该集团此前设在柬埔寨金边的诈骗窝点,已于2025年9月9日遭到柬埔寨警方与新加坡警方联合行动打击。 截至11月6日,该案已有7名嫌疑人落网,另有29名嫌疑人仍在逃,其中包括23名新加坡籍人员和6名马来西亚籍人员。 新加坡警…
SOSO 搜搜 把 Telegram 搜索和发现放在一个入口。 想继续找频道、群组、帖子或贴纸,直接输入关键词。 也可以从发现页继续浏览同类入口。 🔗 本频道专属邀请链接 https://t.me/sososo?start=autopromo_-1001665306621_8403611232_soso_2d13c9ed
亚美尼亚批准引渡一名涉组织非法越境人员至中国,嫌疑人已被移交! 此前文章: 11月5日,据亚美尼亚总检察长办公室消息,应中国有关主管部门提出的请求,亚美尼亚方面批准将一名被通缉人员引渡至中国。 通报称,该人员代号为 Y.P.,涉嫌组织他人非法跨越国家边境。经亚美尼亚总检察长批准相关引渡请求后,该人员已被正式移交中国有关主管部门处理。 目前,官方尚未公布该人员的具体身份、国籍,以及案件涉及的其他人员和详细情况。 PS:哪位盘总被引渡了
斯里兰卡警方突查一家酒店,32名中国人因涉嫌网络金融诈骗接受调查! 11月6日至7日,斯里兰卡警方对位于帕纳杜拉(Panadura)纳洛鲁瓦(Nalloruwa)地区的一家酒店展开突击检查,**现场发现32名中国籍人员,并查扣23台电脑及其他电子设备。 据了解,帕纳杜拉警区高级警司此前接获情报,称有一批中国籍人员涉嫌从事非法网络金融活动。警方随后展开初步调查,并取得帕纳杜拉地方法院签发的搜查令,对涉事酒店进行检查。 此次行动由当地刑事调查部门联合斯里兰卡刑事调查局(CID)、警察特别任务部队(STF)及其他相关部门共同执行。 警方目前正在调查这32名中国籍人员是否涉及网络金融诈骗,并检查查扣的电脑及电子设备是否被用于犯罪活动。 相关设备已移交帕纳杜拉南警察局,案件由刑事调查局继续调查。 斯里兰卡警方表示,近期已发现多起外国人涉嫌利用酒店、宾馆及度假村等住宿场所从事金融诈骗的案件,并提醒酒店经营者加强留意住客的可疑活动。…
Video, posted without a caption
#吃瓜:这年头大师业务太全面了,包间都开始祈福了,难道佛祖也蹦迪吗**🤣
#频道互推 #相似推荐 ------------------------------ 📢 东南亚风云大小事 📢 缅甸缅北东南亚新闻曝光 📢 泰国越南马来西亚新闻曝光 📢 东南亚大事件 📢 西港日记 柬埔寨快讯 📢 东南亚新闻网 📢 《🇬🇾东南亚新闻》东南亚资讯|东南亚曝光 📢 soso东南亚-百科🌍 📢 东南亚大事件-新闻 曝光 吃瓜 📢 泉州新闻 ------------------------------ 🤝 加入互推 · 获得曝光,赚邀请奖励
#群友投稿:为什么东南亚灰产多?不是因为他们不守法,而是因为体制和命运本身就不公平。 灰产 ≠单纯犯罪,而是生存的变相抗争。“掀开天宫的一角”,说白了,就是底层人想掀翻那个由财团、贵族、跨国资本垄断的资源金字塔。当法律只保护拥有权力的人时,“不守法”成了一种对现实的不合作运动。 他们不是不知道风险,而是知道“守法也无法活得好”。他们不是天生恶,而是这个游戏早就有人出老千。那些进入灰产的灵魂,不一定邪恶,但一定曾经无助。有些人想逃脱现实的束缚,有些人想挑战体制的封印,有些人只是不想再被命运拿捏。这不是黑与白的问题,而是结构性的“无解之解”。 这是一场文明、权力、制度与人性之间的角力。**灰产不是单纯的道德问题,而是秩序与自由、压迫与反抗、规则与现实之间的斗争。
币安被盗牵出朝鲜! 11月8日,韩联社消息:针对币安被盗案,美国国务院发言人正式回应。核心观点很明确:各国政府必须协同行动,共同应对朝鲜的网络威胁。 此前文章: **** 美方呼吁所有联合国成员国严格执行现有对朝制裁,切断朝鲜为武器项目“搞钱”的渠道。发言人强调,协调一致的单边制裁是阻断武器扩散资金流的有力工具。 不过,关于是否已与韩国分享调查结果,或就追加制裁进行双边磋商,美方并未透露细节。此前,FBI已将此次黑客攻击归咎于朝鲜。
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,542 posts we hold for @dnymrxwb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@dnymrxwb edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 27 September 2026
- Most recent edit
- 27 September 2026
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@uuss1 · 9,83373 posts78.COM-官方频道@DF78
@tg78com · 31,23864 posts8K国际 官方频道
@SSVIP8K · 21,46752 posts8k国际官方频道
@vip8k090 · 3,38852 postsU8国际官方频道
@U8AKA · 444 postsSOSO搜搜
@sososo · 585,37627 postsU8.com 官方红包中心
@u8gjhb · 10,14822 posts头条事件
@toutiaoshijian · 66,79810 postsSOSO搜搜
@sooo · 484,7954 postsSOSO搜搜🔞
@SosoCnBot · 241,3783 posts东南亚新闻 @U9U77
@u9u77 · 1,1952 posts柬中时报官方导航 @cctimes
@cctimes · 3,3711 post8K国际官方频道
@PG8K001 · 4901 postSOSO搜搜
@souso · 593,1151 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@dnymrxwb named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 7 posts, 15 October 2026 – 6 November 2026 · confirmed gone 27 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚每日新闻报” (@dnymrxwb), 64,444 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dnymrxwb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.