6 measurements spanning 42 days, net +10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 231–244 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 09:17
242
+5
9 Sept 2026, 11:00
237
+3
23 Aug 2026, 00:58
234
+1
16 Aug 2026, 06:56
233
+1
8 Aug 2026, 10:05
232
no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:55
232
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 46s
Average length
18s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
102 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
33
32.4%
custom 5422538735394766352
21
20.6%
custom 5395597754166682968
13
12.7%
custom 5222187272769654422
11
10.8%
custom 5334662244229726084
10
9.80%
custom 5388642217839570837
9
8.82%
🔥
4
3.92%
custom 5456140674028019486
1
0.98%
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 102 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
АНТИАУКЦИОН на Консультацию
Многие писали, что не успели поучаствовать в июльском. Я обещала повторить его в августе!
В этот раз формат будет немного другой.
Как работает антиаукцион?
Я ставлю стартовую цену на консультацию. Без скидок, бонусов, «плюшек» для постоянных клиентов.
18000 рублей.
Вы начинаете эту цену снижать. Шаг - 500 рублей.
Например, кто-то пишет: «минус 500 рублей»
Теперь цена 17.500. Потом следу…
Спасибо всем, кто участвовал в игре. Обязательно будем повторять подобное
Правильный ответ в комментариях.
Также там все имена победителей. Их ждут минисюрпризы
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @dobrobabenko. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
💼Помощь призывникам @voennik365 · 25,816 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Psyprofi” (@dobrobabenko), 242 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dobrobabenko.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
