Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Dobrunia trader

Channel

Dobrunia trader

@dobruniatrader

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,609subscribers

+38 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001617566716
TypeChannel
Username@dobruniatrader
DescriptionЗдесь мой взгляд на Smart Money и ликвидность🐹 Все что вы здесь видите предоставляется в развлекательных целях и не является финансовым советом YouTube -https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCU_UQheH2U6jJprK9KGFP8w По вопросам: @artemshk_o
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held56
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/dobruniatrader

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

10,57010,61710,593.57 August 2026 — 10,571 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,578 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,583 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,596 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,597 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,602 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,598 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,595 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,605 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,617 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,611 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,608 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,609 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,612 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,607 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,606 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,615 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,610 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,606 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,604 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,598 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,604 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,615 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,610 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,617 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,610 subscribers5 September 2026 — 10,603 subscribers8 September 2026 — 10,607 subscribers11 September 2026 — 10,597 subscribers14 September 2026 — 10,604 subscribers25 September 2026 — 10,589 subscribers4 October 2026 — 10,582 subscribers8 October 2026 — 10,570 subscribers13 October 2026 — 10,599 subscribers14 October 2026 — 10,601 subscribers15 October 2026 — 10,608 subscribers16 October 2026 — 10,607 subscribers18 October 2026 — 10,605 subscribers20 October 2026 — 10,601 subscribers22 October 2026 — 10,602 subscribers22 October 2026 — 10,598 subscribers24 October 2026 — 10,602 subscribers25 October 2026 — 10,596 subscribers25 October 2026 — 10,598 subscribers27 October 2026 — 10,594 subscribers28 October 2026 — 10,589 subscribers29 October 2026 — 10,595 subscribers30 October 2026 — 10,591 subscribers31 October 2026 — 10,593 subscribers1 November 2026 — 10,601 subscribers2 November 2026 — 10,604 subscribers3 November 2026 — 10,608 subscribers4 November 2026 — 10,610 subscribers5 November 2026 — 10,603 subscribers6 November 2026 — 10,608 subscribers7 November 2026 — 10,609 subscribers10,6097 August 20267 November 2026
56 measurements spanning 92 days, net +38. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,563–10,624 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 56
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 10:0910,609+1
6 Nov 2026, 10:1710,608+5
5 Nov 2026, 06:5810,603-7
4 Nov 2026, 05:5010,610+2
3 Nov 2026, 06:2710,608+4
2 Nov 2026, 06:2510,604+3
1 Nov 2026, 08:1110,601+8
31 Oct 2026, 05:5810,593+2
30 Oct 2026, 07:0510,591-4
29 Oct 2026, 07:3710,595+6
28 Oct 2026, 04:0010,589-5
27 Oct 2026, 01:1710,594-4
25 Oct 2026, 23:3410,598+2
25 Oct 2026, 02:5910,596-6
24 Oct 2026, 00:3610,602+4
22 Oct 2026, 23:2810,598-4
22 Oct 2026, 00:3010,602+1
20 Oct 2026, 16:0810,601-4
18 Oct 2026, 12:3610,605-2
16 Oct 2026, 10:5510,607first reading

Engagement

116 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.2%
avg views ÷ 10,609 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,500
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.29%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
28
of 116 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held116 (5 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total42,050
Reactions total1,385
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 21:08 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈4,530
Videos
≈26
Links
≈4,100

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
7m 57s
Average length
3m 59s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5,562 reactions across 116 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3,42461.6%
🔥1,12620.2%
❤65911.8%
🤯2504.49%
👎1031.85%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 116 of the 116 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,562 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 116 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
16
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 116 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dobruniatrader. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 116 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 28 posts held from the last 30 days (7.14%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 15:04 UTC≈1,280 views65 reactions1 Starread 7 November 2026
Photo

🔤🔤🔤🔤 за терепение https://www.tradingview.com/x/vRzFU3Ro/

👍48🔥14❤2🤯1

6 Nov 2026, 05:38 UTC≈1,510 views54 reactionsread 7 November 2026

https://youtu.be/-xeR785pBEA

👍44🔥10

6 Nov 2026, 05:38 UTC≈1,520 views31 reactionsread 7 November 2026

вместо логики рынка

👍27🔥4

5 Nov 2026, 14:02 UTC≈1,650 views93 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Новое видео уже на канале!

🔥64👍25❤3👎1

5 Nov 2026, 12:19 UTC≈1,730 views161 reactions1 Starread 7 November 2026
Photo

Пробой был. Вход. А цена развернулась и снесла стоп? Это не «не повезло». Это классическое разочарование. В новом видео разобрал по шагам: — как отличить настоящий пробой от ловушки — почему нельзя заходить на первой зеленой свече — связка H4 + M15 для подтверждения — где ждать накопление после снятия ликвидности и как входить консервативно Видео будет доступно через 1 час 40 минут (17:00 +3GMT) Видео тут

🔥102👍40❤19

5 Nov 2026, 07:14 UTC≈1,620 views71 reactions1 Starread 7 November 2026

впоросы для логики рынка буду предварительно присылать сюда, что бы вы заранее с ними ознакомились, думаю это будет полезно)

👍56🔥15

5 Nov 2026, 07:13 UTC≈1,450 views27 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Poll

Этот гэп может быть частью имбаланса?

  1. ✅73%
  2. ❌27%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍17🔥4🤯4👎2

5 Nov 2026, 07:12 UTC≈1,400 views20 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

#structure #EURUSD https://www.tradingview.com/x/nex6nkLc/ #GBPUSD https://www.tradingview.com/x/AybWnfXd/ #GOLD https://www.tradingview.com/x/rRk0Kc6z/ #SPX500 https://www.tradingview.com/x/r1R80Xqi/ #BTC https://www.tradingview.com/x/TA2BboP9/ Идея по EURUSD в TW 🔮 https://ru.tradingview.com/chart/EURUSD/pzpmBQDs-eurusd-logika-dvizheniya-rynka-05-11/

👍15🔥3❤2

5 Nov 2026, 06:49 UTC≈1,350 views62 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

сегодня отвечаем на этот вопрос #вопросыдлялогикирынка

❤25👍24🔥12🤯1

5 Nov 2026, 06:30 UTC≈1,410 views28 reactionsread 7 November 2026

📺📺📺📺📺📺 https://youtube.com/live/w_UV6SVPOpI?feature=share

👍12❤11🔥5

4 Nov 2026, 17:11 UTC≈1,520 views65 reactions2 Starsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Когда мы говорим о чужих стопах мы всегда говорим о своих действиях, которые делали когда-то сами и это позволяет идеально видеть рынок, даже предсказывать разочарование заранее https://www.tradingview.com/x/jF5rsRY1/ об этом на логике рынка, в скрытом тг и дискорд, чем больше практик, тем больше понимания рынка

👍45🔥10❤8👎1🤯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 116 posts we hold for @dobruniatrader. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@dobruniatrader edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
5 November 2026
Most recent edit
5 November 2026

Polls

The 6 most recent of 18 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Nov 2026, 07:13 UTCAnonymous Quiz288 voters

Этот гэп может быть частью имбаланса?

  1. ✅73%
  2. ❌27%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 Nov 2026, 07:08 UTCAnonymous Quiz383 voters

Этот гэп может быть частью имбаланса?

  1. ✅60%
  2. ❌40%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Nov 2026, 06:55 UTCAnonymous Quiz335 voters

Верно ли указана данная структура?

  1. да47%
  2. нет53%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Nov 2026, 06:13 UTCAnonymous Quiz367 voters

Что делать дальше?

  1. ждать бос или чоч47%
  2. переносить idm16%
  3. удалить структуру тк там ошибка25%
  4. я в домике12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Sept 2026, 06:41 UTCAnonymous Quiz415 voters

Верно ли указан правильный откат?

  1. да57%
  2. нет43%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

31 Aug 2026, 06:50 UTCAnonymous Quiz382 voters

Что неверно в данной структуре?

  1. IDM28%
  2. верхняя точка не там20%
  3. нет переноса нижней точки52%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 116 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Волновой Анализ 🥇
@Elliotrading · 48,625
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 25 August 2026
Арденский | Трейдинг и психология
@arden_YT · 20,581
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 27 September 2026
Trader`s University
@tradingplusforex · 22,729
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 1 October 2026
Артём Звёздин - обучение трейдингу
@uiartemzvezdin · 76,248
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 August 2026
SANCHO D.T.
@SANCHO_DT · 65,963
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 21 August 2026
TRADiNG hub ™
@tradinghubreal · 36,531
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Dobrunia trader” (@dobruniatrader), 10,609 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dobruniatrader.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.