Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Докмед Академия

Channel

Докмед Академия

@docmed_universe

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,021subscribers

-64 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001365534766
TypeChannel
Username@docmed_universe
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held23
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/docmed_universe

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

5,9986,0856,041.57 August 2026 — 6,085 subscribers8 August 2026 — 6,085 subscribers11 August 2026 — 6,075 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,068 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,062 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,068 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,066 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,056 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,052 subscribers6 September 2026 — 6,050 subscribers11 September 2026 — 6,045 subscribers14 September 2026 — 6,038 subscribers19 September 2026 — 6,032 subscribers28 September 2026 — 6,025 subscribers5 October 2026 — 6,015 subscribers12 October 2026 — 6,010 subscribers15 October 2026 — 6,013 subscribers18 October 2026 — 6,012 subscribers22 October 2026 — 6,017 subscribers24 October 2026 — 6,009 subscribers27 October 2026 — 6,006 subscribers30 October 2026 — 5,998 subscribers5 November 2026 — 6,021 subscribers6,0217 August 20265 November 2026
23 measurements spanning 90 days, net -64. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,985–6,098 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 21:416,021+23
30 Oct 2026, 21:005,998-8
27 Oct 2026, 19:486,006-3
24 Oct 2026, 23:316,009-8
22 Oct 2026, 02:486,017+5
18 Oct 2026, 19:476,012-1
15 Oct 2026, 09:556,013+3
12 Oct 2026, 12:046,010-5
5 Oct 2026, 18:376,015-10
28 Sept 2026, 08:576,025-7
19 Sept 2026, 02:416,032-6
14 Sept 2026, 22:186,038-7
11 Sept 2026, 03:566,045-5
6 Sept 2026, 10:596,050-2
1 Sept 2026, 23:166,052-4
29 Aug 2026, 22:126,056-10
26 Aug 2026, 13:346,066-2
20 Aug 2026, 02:536,068+6
17 Aug 2026, 11:056,062-6
14 Aug 2026, 03:176,068first reading

Engagement

36 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.87%
avg views ÷ 6,021 subscribers
Avg views / post
414
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.31%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 36 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held36 (13 July 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total5,791
Reactions total134
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 02:08 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9m 22s
Average length
1m 34s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

549 reactions across 35 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤23643.0%
👍14426.2%
🔥539.65%
❤‍🔥397.10%
😍213.83%
💘122.19%
💔101.82%
😁71.28%
💯61.09%
🥰50.911%
👀40.729%
👏30.546%
😢30.546%
👨‍💻20.364%
🤔20.364%
👌10.182%
😨10.182%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 549 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 14 posts held from the last 30 days (7.14%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 16:47 UTC404 views3 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Шесть потоков позади. Седьмой станет финальным 💙 «Аллергия в большом городе» за это время стала чем-то большим, чем просто образовательный курс. Три дня живого общения с коллегами, клинических разборов и отработки практических навыков. Шесть потоков, каждый из которых объединил врачей, готовых глубже погружаться в аллергологию. И сегодня у нас важная новость 🔥️️️️️️ Седьмой поток курса «Аллергия в большом городе»…

❤3

3 Nov 2026, 16:39 UTC298 views9 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Ноябрь в Докмед Академии обещает быть насыщенным 🍁 Возвращение Елисея Осина, новые образовательные продукты по РПП, очные мероприятия и любимые курсы, к которым можно присоединиться в любое время. Рассказываем обо всём по порядку! Новинки ноября: 📎Елисей Осин возвращается в Докмед Академию! Да-да, вы всё правильно прочитали! После долгого перерыва Елисей снова с нами и готовит новый онлайн-интенсив о депрессии. …

❤‍🔥5❤2😍2

2 Nov 2026, 10:37 UTC465 views16 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

EADV 2026: главное с международного конгресса дерматологов 👩🏻‍⚕️ Какие исследования могут изменить клиническую практику? Что нового появилось в диагностике и лечении дерматологических заболеваний? И на какие открытия стоит обратить внимание уже сейчас? 🖇️ 19 ноября команда NAOS совместно с врачами сети клиник docmed и docdeti приглашает коллег обсудить ключевые итоги конгресса EADV 2026, который этой осенью прошёл …

❤8❤‍🔥4😍4

1 Nov 2026, 16:47 UTC334 views9 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Иногда самое сложное на приёме начинается не с диагноза 🖇️ А с момента, когда пациент не хочет говорить. Когда родители не согласны с рекомендациями. Когда разговор заходит в тупик или привычный сценарий общения просто не работает. И именно такие ситуации хочется не просто обсуждать в теории, а разбирать вместе с коллегами: что произошло, почему разговор пошёл именно так и что врач мог бы сделать иначе. Именно это…

❤‍🔥3💘3😍2❤1

30 Oct 2026, 17:23 UTC358 views8 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Вопрос возник на приеме — разберитесь в нем вечером 💻 Не успели на мастерскую? Хотели пройти курс, но не успели на прошедший поток? Ищете обучение, которое можно проходить в удобном формате? Загляните в каталог Докмед Академии! Мы собрали там видеокурсы, клинические разборы и интенсивы от практикующих врачей сети клиник DocMed и DocDeti 🖇️ Среди продуктов Академии: нейросонография глазами невролога, БОС-терапия т…

❤3❤‍🔥3😍2

29 Oct 2026, 16:59 UTC375 views13 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Иногда самое сложное назначение педиатра — ничего не назначать Ребёнок с температурой третий день. Родители переживают, ждут лечения и спрашивают, почему врач не назначает антибиотик 💊 А педиатру нужно оценить состояние ребёнка, исключить тревожные признаки и объяснить, почему в конкретной ситуации наблюдение может быть правильной тактикой. Именно такие решения составляют большую часть амбулаторной практики. Когда…

❤7👍3🔥3

28 Oct 2026, 16:59 UTC381 views15 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

Ребёнок не говорит и редко откликается на имя. Всегда ли дело в РАС? 🤔 На приём к врачу-психиатру Александре Печенкиной привели мальчика 2,5 лет. 🖇️ У ребёнка практически отсутствовала речь, он редко отзывался на имя, и поэтому его родители начали подозревать у ребёнка расстройство аутистического спектра. При этом сомнений в его слухе у семьи не возникало. Аудиоскрининг в роддоме был пройден успешно, в бытовой обс…

🔥11❤2👍2

27 Oct 2026, 15:01 UTC391 views11 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Forwarded from @docdeti_team

Posted without readable text

❤4😁3❤‍🔥2👏1😍1

26 Oct 2026, 15:27 UTC464 views4 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Мелатонин действительно безопасен? А ночные пробуждения всегда связаны с нарушениями сна? 😴 На мастерской «Ловцы снов: Сложные случаи» вместе с Ольгой Шемятовской, врачом-неврологом и сомнологом, мы разобрали вопросы, с которыми сталкиваются врачи при диагностике и лечении нарушений сна. И теперь запись мастерской доступна для тех, кто не смог присоединиться к нам в прямом эфире! Что обсудили на встрече? 🔹Мелатон…

❤2❤‍🔥1💘1

24 Oct 2026, 15:27 UTC452 views9 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

Когда женскую боль наконец смогли увидеть 🩺 Долгое время тазовая боль у женщин оставалась одной из сложных диагностических задач. Пациентки жаловались на боль, но установить её причину удавалось далеко не всегда. Ситуация начала меняться с развитием лапароскопии, которая позволила врачам исследовать органы малого таза изнутри и выявлять изменения, ранее недоступные для визуальной оценки. Как лапароскопия изменила …

❤4❤‍🔥3😍2

23 Oct 2026, 16:17 UTC474 views17 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

От практикума по аллергологии до открытия целого аллергоцентра Сегодня хотим познакомить вас с Екатериной Траньковой, врачом-аллергологом-иммунологом из Читы и участницей прошлого потока нашего очного практикума по аллергологии 🖇️ Екатерина приехала на обучение, чтобы увереннее проводить диагностические пробы и освоить процедуры, с которыми раньше не работала. Сейчас она уже применяет полученные знания на приёме, …

❤‍🔥7🔥6❤4

22 Oct 2026, 13:50 UTC445 views5 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Уже через полтора часа начинаем 😍️️️️️️ Сегодня в 18:00 встречаемся на онлайн-мастерской «Ловцы снов: Сложные случаи» с Ольгой Шемятовской. Будем разбирать непростые клинические ситуации, обсуждать современные подходы к диагностике и лечению нарушений сна и искать ответы на вопросы, которые возникают в практике. 💙 Если вы ещё не успели зарегистрироваться, присоединиться к мастерской можно по ссылке

🔥3❤1❤‍🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @docmed_universe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Невролог Стецкая Татьяна | ️doctor_steckaya 💊🩺
@doctor_steckaya · 32,623
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 4 September 2026
DocDeti & DocMed
@docdeti_docmed · 62,956
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 August 2026
Заметки детского врача
@DrButriy · 137,626
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
MD.school | Медицинский онлайн-университет | Доказательная медицина
@medicina_discendi · 21,248
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 25 September 2026
Справочник педиатра
@pediatrhelp · 19,277
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 October 2026
Помощник педиатра | МедикУм
@pomoshnik_pediatra · 23,739
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 17 September 2026
Занудная педиатрия — Роман Шиян
@drshnr · 37,027
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 1 September 2026
Шура, выручай!
@shura_help · 34,561
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 3 September 2026
ninavaccina
@ninavaccina · 90,349
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 17 August 2026
Краснощеков | Детская психиатрия
@doc_kras · 19,312
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 4 October 2026
Аллергология для чайников с Ольгой Жоголевой
@allergo_doc · 39,376
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 31 August 2026
Доктор Лесков
@doctorleskov · 27,764
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 September 2026
Доктор Неешпапа 🫁 /doctor_neeshpapa/
@doctor_neeshpapa · 31,811
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 5 September 2026
Профессия – педиатр
@profpediatrician · 19,646
Telegram ranks this channel #92 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 1 October 2026
Юрист для врача Ангелина Романовская
@mfcexpert_news · 29,892
Telegram ranks this channel #93 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 8 September 2026

This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Докмед Академия” (@docmed_universe), 6,021 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/docmed_universe.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.