Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 86 Docta Share

Channel

86 Docta Share

@doctashare

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

470subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003752892253
TypeChannel
Username@doctashare
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 25 June 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/doctashare

Growth

470473471.56 August 2026 — 473 subscribers6 August 2026 — 473 subscribers12 August 2026 — 472 subscribers18 August 2026 — 473 subscribers26 August 2026 — 472 subscribers2 September 2026 — 470 subscribers6 August 20262 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 27 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 470–473 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 07:13470-2
26 Aug 2026, 09:24472-1
18 Aug 2026, 20:18473+1
12 Aug 2026, 18:14472-1
6 Aug 2026, 19:02473no change
6 Aug 2026, 14:07473first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 25 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

91 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6672.5%
🔥1415.4%
🫡44.40%
👌22.20%
💘22.20%
😨22.20%
👍11.10%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 91 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 17 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @doctashare. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 18:45 UTC23 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @itishikava

в данный момент, без меня PackIt умрет. наверное, вы этому рады. а может кто-то и нет. посоветуйте что делать в комментариях к ЭТОМУ ПОСТУ(а не к посту куда это было переслано). я решил запостить это в этом канале потому что здесь в комментариях никто не в бане и каждый может написать что думает, также я не хочу это писать в каком-то конкретном канале. я решил просто переслать в несколько. из вероятных вариантов:

1 Aug 2026, 18:11 UTC178 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @packitapp

Вчера я был очень занят, да и сегодня времени почти не было. Но всё же удалось выкроить несколько минут, чтобы написать этот пост. Спустя 7,5 месяцев разработки PackIt и 368 дней работы над ElyxCore состоялся первый релиз PackIt. Вышел... самый большой по объёму кода и функциональности проект в exteraGram, самый проработанный с точки зрения дизайна и, безусловно, самый качественный. Конечно, не обошлось без багов,

7

31 Jul 2026, 21:22 UTC389 viewsread 6 August 2026

Через неопределенное время от меня выйдут новых 2 плагина. И возможно ещё 1 глобальный, но не такой как PackIt. Docta Share | Список плагинов

31 Jul 2026, 13:38 UTC230 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @packitapp

У кого есть аккаунт на GitHub и пару секунд времени, поставьте пожалуйста звездочки сюда: shareui/packit-source Форум | PackIt EN

🫡3

31 Jul 2026, 13:29 UTC156 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @packitapp

Первый релиз PackIt Для начала обновитесь на последнюю версию exteraGram. Затем перейдите сюда и обновите SDK. Сообщить о баге: GitHub Issues Форум: PackitGround Как создать репозиторий: repo-doc КУДА ОТПРАВЛЯТЬ ПЛАГИНЫ Весь функционал плагина находится в его настройках. Варианты установки: С файла GitHub Releases

1

30 Jul 2026, 15:22 UTC383 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Docta Share | Список плагинов

3🫡1

29 Jul 2026, 21:59 UTC394 viewsread 6 August 2026

t.me/elyxcore <- официальный канал ElyxCore, веду его я и @pixwet Docta Share | Список плагинов

27 Jul 2026, 14:38 UTC≈1,630 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Уже можете мне на этот аккаунт @windcv скидывать свои плагины для добавления в PackIt, желательно указать ссылку на свой канал/репозиторий(если плагин не полностью на python) и прочее. Ознакомьтесь с правилами, пожалуйста: shareui.de/packit/rules Потому что... скороооооо Docta Share | Список плагинов

3

18 Jul 2026, 09:47 UTC854 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Вот такая вот движуха Я не знаю почему цвета такие контрастные на видео, но на деле там мягкая палитра. Docta Share | Список плагинов

2

17 Jul 2026, 19:36 UTC749 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Docta Share | Список плагинов

13

14 Jul 2026, 13:38 UTC706 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @exterabetanewsPhoto

Имеем ввиду кто такой этот ваш квуко))) А потом меня хотят забанить за токсичность ХАХАХАХАХ че за абсурд ✈️ exteraNews. Подписаться

4😨2

14 Jul 2026, 13:08 UTC476 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @exterabetanewsPhoto

В июне кстати меня замутили в чате саппортеров когда я даже не заходил пару дней в чат (и тем более не писал ничего). Учитывая, что замутили меня без сообщения и без причины, заставляет задуматься что тоже "коллективное решение" пидорасов. ✈️ exteraNews. Подписаться

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @doctashare. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“86 Docta Share” (@doctashare), 470 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/doctashare.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.