Channel
@docteleg
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
29subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 2 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004304573897 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @docteleg |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 23 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 2 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/docteleg |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 18:01 | 29 | -2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 17:15 | 31 | no change |
| 2 Sept 2026, 17:00 | 31 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 23 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
126 reactions across 13 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 36 | 28.6% | |
| 💩 | 33 | 26.2% | |
| 👎 | 15 | 11.9% | |
| 🤡 | 10 | 7.94% | |
| 💘 | 8 | 6.35% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 6.35% | |
| 🤬 | 7 | 5.56% | |
| 🤮 | 5 | 3.97% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.794% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 0.794% | |
| 💊 | 1 | 0.794% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 0.794% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 126 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 23 August 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Й мого посту який всі зарепостили не було б, якщо б тих хто вказував на це не видаляли. Бо так, знайшлися люди які не знали й взяли участь, але після посту видалили анкету Є ті які любили автора, але мають іншу позицію ніж автор й для них вона важлива, тому обрали піти з цього простору. Й цей телеграф теж, просто щоб люди знали А ті хто буде писати лише гнів агресію й погрози знайдуться завжди, й не треба це приписув…
👎15💩7💘6❤4
Хочу вписати чучуть Цей телеграф робиться не обісрать "фу піздєц капєц" Цей телеграф робиться бо у нас всіх різні позиції. Люди які не згодні з позицією автора мають мати можливість дізнатися про це, бо очевидно потім про це все в майбутньому тему будуть заминати. А також головним стала поведінка автора. Якщо б у пості самопіару написали що приймається люба мова, нічого б взагалі не було. Чому я вважаю що зараз це ва…
💩14❤6🤮5💘2
Прийшли захисники автора знову, уже в цей канал :^
🤬7💩6🔥5❤4🤡4🍾1💋1
Люди які беруть участь напряму в створенні телеграфу пишіть сюди обговорення Я не впевнена але виглядає так що вже двоє людей взялися за його створення? Пишіть обговорення сюди щоб не було потім двох телеграфів випадково
❤6🤡6💩4❤🔥1
Під цим постом, надсилайте скріншоти й інфо які вважаєте за потрібні, якщо їх немає пересланих з коментарів моїх постів.
❤2🔥1
Під цим постом пишіть аргументи та пояснення які вважаєте що мають попасти в телеграф, якщо потрібно разом з додаванням фото до них якщо потрібно.
❤3🔥2
Photo, posted without a caption
там всюди пише тег власник то це вона сама і пише, ніякий це не модер
❤2💩2
ще ну і ось це. ця авторка малювала недавно фанарт, який кинула в анонку укр мовою і потім з цим артом пішла в самопіар
❤1
ну очевидно, що ці всі слова її, і немає там модерації
❤2
плюс ну і репостити анонки такі і нічого про них не казати - бля
❤3
дуже легко плюс почитати старі пости нарпиклад цей https://t.me/serdelkaxx/2570 чому тут росняве?
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @docteleg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Телеграф на @serdelkaxx” (@docteleg), 29 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/docteleg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.