Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Doctor Klishko

Channel

Doctor Klishko

@doctorklishko

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,084subscribers

-21 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001257200892
TypeChannel
Username@doctorklishko
Created18 November 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/doctorklishko

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7,0797,1057,0926 August 2026 — 7,105 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,105 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,103 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,098 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,088 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,079 subscribers21 August 2026 — 7,090 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,092 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,088 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,084 subscribers2 September 2026 — 7,085 subscribers7 September 2026 — 7,080 subscribers11 September 2026 — 7,085 subscribers16 September 2026 — 7,084 subscribers7,0846 August 202616 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 40 days, net -21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,075–7,109 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 00:207,084-1
11 Sept 2026, 21:217,085+5
7 Sept 2026, 16:197,080-5
2 Sept 2026, 20:257,085+1
31 Aug 2026, 03:267,084-4
27 Aug 2026, 20:247,088-4
25 Aug 2026, 01:377,092+2
21 Aug 2026, 04:247,090+11
17 Aug 2026, 18:087,079-9
14 Aug 2026, 06:167,088-10
10 Aug 2026, 19:357,098-5
7 Aug 2026, 19:237,103-2
6 Aug 2026, 20:457,105no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:367,105first reading

Engagement

77 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 77 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
30m 28s
Average length
1m 08s

Measured directly from 27 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,488 reactions across 74 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,40656.5%
🔥76030.5%
👍1084.34%
❤‍🔥963.86%
👏401.61%
😍291.17%
🏆220.884%
💯160.643%
🥰50.201%
🤪40.161%
🤣20.08%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 74 of the 77 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,488 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 77 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 76 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @doctorklishko. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 77 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 20 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 13:28 UTC512 views26 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Уход «Сеул» Кожа говорит сама за себя. Косметолог: Анна Корчемкина

13😍8🔥4🏆1

Signed Victoria

20 Aug 2026, 12:56 UTC582 views9 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👍9

Signed Victoria

20 Aug 2026, 12:43 UTC598 views15 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🔥15

Signed Victoria

20 Aug 2026, 12:42 UTC600 views24 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Уход в ритме города Сеул. Посмотрите, что мы творим с мышцами🤗

🔥177

Signed Victoria

20 Aug 2026, 11:27 UTC730 views36 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Не могу не поделиться) Пилочный маникюр и недавно придуманный spa уход. Посмотрите какое сияние кожи🌟

👍2011🔥5

Signed Victoria

20 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC785 views14 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @DoctorSofiZotovaVideo

Любимый протокол: Два вида плазмы(PRP) +фотодинамическая терапия (ФБМ) Почему? PRP - источник тромбоцитов, которые содержат большое количество факторов роста( PDGF, TGF-β, VEGF, EGF) и других медиаторов, которые участвуют в репарации, клеточной миграции и ремоделировании клеточного матрикса. А самое главное, что этот набор вашей коже идеально понятен из-за полноты набора стимулирующих компонентов. ФБМ - работает ч

14

Signed Victoria

20 Aug 2026, 08:32 UTC802 views6 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

#отсахарастареем

💯6

Signed Victoria

20 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC805 views7 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💯7

Signed Victoria

20 Aug 2026, 08:06 UTC≈1,050 views34 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Уважаемые коллеги! Технология плазменного омоложения NeoGen, которая уже давно и успешно применяется в нашей клинике и показывает результаты, способные удивить даже опытных специалистов, официально собирает своих поклонников и последователей на первом в России саммите NeoGen. В октябре в Москве нас ждут лучшие клинические кейсы, впечатляющие результаты «до и после», выступления ведущих экспертов, разборы протоколов

🔥313

Signed Victoria

19 Aug 2026, 16:27 UTC≈1,100 views33 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Дискотека для митохондрий.

26🤪4😍3

Signed Victoria

19 Aug 2026, 14:55 UTC≈1,050 views35 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

И вот такая картина у нас сегодня! Наши процедуры не только про красоту, но и про качество жизни. Собираем❤️

35

Signed Victoria

Showing the 12 most recent of 77 posts we hold for @doctorklishko. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

NataliiaGotsii
@nataliiagotsii · 26,264
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 18 September 2026
Запишите меня
@doctor_lekomtseva · 29,738
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 September 2026
Катькало
@Juliacatcalo · 24,237
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 16 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Doctor Klishko” (@doctorklishko), 7,084 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/doctorklishko.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.